اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات282
تعداد نشریات سازمان80
تعداد شماره‌ها3,262
تعداد مقالات36,058
تعداد مشاهده مقاله55,178,925
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله94,178,681
خسروی مشیزی, اعظم, شرافتمندراد, محسن. (1400). بررسی ارتباط تنوع گیاهان با تولید سالانه مراتع نیمه خشک پارک ملی خبر، استان کرمان. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 28(2), 266-279. doi: 10.22092/ijrdr.2021.124164
اعظم خسروی مشیزی; محسن شرافتمندراد. "بررسی ارتباط تنوع گیاهان با تولید سالانه مراتع نیمه خشک پارک ملی خبر، استان کرمان". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 28, 2, 1400, 266-279. doi: 10.22092/ijrdr.2021.124164
خسروی مشیزی, اعظم, شرافتمندراد, محسن. (1400). 'بررسی ارتباط تنوع گیاهان با تولید سالانه مراتع نیمه خشک پارک ملی خبر، استان کرمان', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 28(2), pp. 266-279. doi: 10.22092/ijrdr.2021.124164
خسروی مشیزی, اعظم, شرافتمندراد, محسن. بررسی ارتباط تنوع گیاهان با تولید سالانه مراتع نیمه خشک پارک ملی خبر، استان کرمان. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1400; 28(2): 266-279. doi: 10.22092/ijrdr.2021.124164

بررسی ارتباط تنوع گیاهان با تولید سالانه مراتع نیمه خشک پارک ملی خبر، استان کرمان

تحقیقات مرتع و بیابان ایران
مقاله 7، دوره 28، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 83، شهریور 1400، صفحه 266-279    اصل مقاله (1009.89 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijrdr.2021.124164
نویسندگان
اعظم خسروی مشیزی* 1؛ محسن شرافتمندراد2
1استادیار گروه مهندسی طبیعت، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه جیرفت، جیرفت ، ایران
2دانشیار گروه مهندسی طبیعت، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه جیرفت، جرفت، ایران
چکیده
­ ارتباط پیچیده بین تنوع زیستی و رفاه بشری با مشخص کردن تأثیر تنوع گونه‌ای بر کارکرد اکوسیستم قابل ساده کردن است. از آنجا که تولید سالانه در مدیریت چرا و پایداری اکوسیستم‌های مرتعی نقش بسیار مهمی دارد، این مطالعه ارتباط تنوع گونه‌ای را با تولید سالانه مراتع نیمه‌خشک پارک ملی خبر در قالب فرضیه تکمیلی آشیان اکولوژیک بررسی می‌کند. تولید سالانه گونه‌ها در پلات 1×1 مترمربعی در دو تیپ درمنه و درمنه-استیپا با استفاده روش قطع و توزین محاسبه شد. نتایج نشان داد اگرچه دو تیپ گیاهی از نظر تولید سالانه با یکدیگر اختلاف معنی‌داری دارند (05/0>p)، اما از نظر شاخص‌های تنوع گونه‌ای شانون، سیمپسون، مارگالف، منهینیک و یکنواختی اختلاف معنی‌داری در سطح 95 درصد اطمینان بین دو تیپ مشاهده نشد. آنالیز همبستگی پیرسون نشان داد که تولید سالانه با شاخص‌های تنوع گونه‌ای در تیپ درمنه-استیپا رابطه مثبت و معنی‌داری دارند، اما در تیپ درمنه رابطه معنی‌داری مشاهده نشد. برخلاف فرضیه تکمیلی آشیان اکولوژیکی، گونه‌ها سهم یکسانی در تولید سالانه نداشتند و گونه غالب درمنه کوهی بیشترین سهم را در تولید داشت. مطابق با فرضیه نسبت توده تنوع صفات عملکردی در گونه‌های غالب سبب موفقیت بهتر تیپ مرتعی درمنه_استیپا نسبت به تیپ درمنه از نظر تولید سالانه شده‌است. به‌طورکلی پیشنهاد می‌شود که برای نگهداری کارکرد اکوسیستم‌ها حفاظت از ترکیب جوامع گیاهی بهتر از نگهداری حداکثر تعداد گونه‌ها کارایی دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
تولید؛ تنوع گونه‌ای؛ مراتع نیمه خشک؛ ترکیب گیاهی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Investigating the relationship between plant diversity and annual production in semi-arid rangelands of National Park Khabr, Kerman province
نویسندگان [English]
Azam Khosravi Mashizi1؛ Mohsen Sharafatmandrad2
1Assistant Professor, Department of Nature Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Jiroft, Jirof, Iran
2Associate Professor, Department of Nature Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Jiroft, Jirof, Iran
چکیده [English]
The complexities of the relationship between biodiversity and human welfare can be simplified by identifying the impact of species diversity on ecosystem function. Since annual production plays an important role in the grazing management and sustainability of rangeland ecosystems, this study examines the relationship between species diversity and annual production of semi-arid rangelands in Khabar National Park under the hypothesis of ecological nest. The annual production of species in 1×1 square plots was estimated in two rangeland types of Artemisia sieberi and Artemisia sieberi- Stipa barbata using the cutting and weighing method. The results showed that although the two plant types differed significantly in terms of annual production (p < /em> <0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two rangeland types in terms of diversity indicators of Shannon, Simpson, Margalf, Manichae, and uniformity index. Pearson’s correlation analysis showed that annual production had a positive and significant relationship with species diversity indicators in Artemisia sieberi- Stipa barbata type; however, no significant relationship was observed in Artemisia sieberi. Contrary to the hypothesis of the ecological nest, species did not have the same contribution in annual production, and the dominant species of Artemisia aucheri had the highest contribution in production. According to the hypothesis of mass ratio, the diversity of functional traits in the dominant species has led to better success of rangeland type the Artemisia aucheri- Stipa barbata than the Artemisia aucheri in terms of annual production. In general, it is recommended that conserving of the composition of plant communities is more important to protect ecosystem services compared to maintaining the maximum number of species.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Production, Species Diversity, Semi-arid Rangelands, Plant Composition
مراجع
  • Baili, Y., Zhuang, C., Ouyang, Z., Zheng, H. and Jiang, B., 2011. Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed. Journal of Ecological Complexity, 8:177–183.
  • Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings,C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G.M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., Kinzig, A. P., Daily, G. C., Loreau, M., Grace, J. B., Larigauderie, A., Srivastava, D.S. and Naeem, S.H., 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact onhumanity. Nature, 486: 59–67.
  • Craine, J.M. and Nippert, J.B., 2011. Physiological drought tolerance and the structuring of tall grass assemblages, Journal of Ecosphere, 2: 1-19.
  • Curry, P. and Payne, A., 1992. Rangeland surveys: a basis for improved land use in “Rangeland Management in Western Australia”, Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Miscellaneous publication 8/92, pp. 9-14.
  • Dangles, O. and Malmqvist, B., 2004. Species richness-decomposition relationships depend on species dominance. Ecology Letters, 7: 395–402.
  • Eisenhauer, N., 2012. Aboveground-belowground interactions asa source of complementarity effects in biodiversity experiments. Journal of Plant and Soil, 351: 1–22.
  • Ellsworth, D.S. and Reich, P. B., 1993. Canopy structure and vertical patternsof photosynthesis and related leaf traits in a deciduous forest. Journal of Oecologia, 96: 169–178.
  • Goharnejad, A., Tahmasebi, P., Asadi, E. and Moetamedi, J., 2017. Comparison of species richness and FAD2 functional diversity in order to estimate the biomass production in the Central Zagros. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 24(1): 1-15.
  • Griffen, B.D. and Drake, J.M., 2008. Effects of habitat quality and size on extinction in experimental populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 275: 2251–2256.
  • Grime, J.P., 2001: Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties, John Wiley & sons, Chichester, UK, 417 pp.
  • Hector, A., Dobson, K., Minns, A., Bazeley-White, E. and Lawton, J.H., 2001. Community diversity and invasion resistance: an experimental test in a grassland ecosystem and a review of comparable studies. Ecological Research, 16: 819–831.
  • Hillebrand, H., Bennett, D.M. and Cadotte. M.W., 2008. Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes. Journal of Ecology, 89: 1510–1520.
  • Hooper, D.U. and Vitousek, P.M., 1998. Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Journal of Ecological Monographs, 68: 121–149.
  • Hooper, D.U. and Vitousek, P.M., 1997: The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes. Journal of Science, 277: 1302–1305.
  • Hooper, D.U., Chapin III, F.S., Ewel, J.J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, , Lawton, J.H., Lodge, D.M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Schmid, B., Setälä, H., Symstad, A.J., Vandermeer, J. and Wardle, D.A., 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge and needs for future research, Journal of Ecological Monographs, 75: 3–35.
  • Hudewenz, A., Klein, A. M., Scherber, C., Stanke, T., Tscharntke,T., Vogel, A., Weigelt, A., Weisser, W.W. and Ebeling, A., 2012. Herbivore and pollinator responsesto grassland management intensity along experimental changesin plant species richness. Journal of Biological Conservation, 150: 42–52.
  • Jafari, A. and Askari, Y., 2015. Comparison of different biodiversity indexes in different sampling designs (Case Study: Chahartagh Forested Reserve, Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari Province). Environmental Researches, 7: 135-144.
  • Kirwan, L., Luscher, A., Semastia, M.T., Finn, J.A., Collins, R.P., Porqueddu, C., Helgadottir, A., Baadshaug, O.H., Brophy, C., Coran, C., Dalmannsdottir, S., Delgado, I., Elgersma, A., Fothergill, M., Frankow-Lindberg, B.E., Golinski, P., Grieu, P., Gustavsson, A.M., et al. 2007. Evenness drives consistent diversity effects in intensive grassland systems across 28 European sites. Journal of Ecology, 95:530–539.
  • Koerner, S. E., Smith, M.D., Burkepile, D.E., Hanan, N.P., Avolio, M.L., Collins, S.L. and Zelikova, T.J., 2018. Change in dominance determines herbivore effects on plant biodiversity. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2: 1925-1932.
  • Le Maitre, D.C., Kotzee, I.M. and O’Farrel, J., 2014. Impacts of land-cover change on the water flow regulation ecosystem service: Invasive alien plants, fire and their policy implications. Land Use Policy, 36: 171-181.
  • Lehman, C.L. and Tilman, D., 2000: Biodiversity, stability, and productivity in competitive communities, The American Naturalist, 156: 534–552.
  • Levine, J.M. and HilleRisLambers, J., 2009. The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity. Nature, 461: 254-257.
  • Li, J., Yang, Ch., Zhou, H. and Shao, X., 2020. Responses of plant diversity and soil microorganism diversity to water and nitrogen additions in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, Global Ecology and Conservation, 22: e01003
  • Liang, J., Zhoua, M., Tobinb, P.C., McGuirec, D. and Reich, P.R., 2015. Biodiversity influences plant productivitythrough niche–efficiency. PNAS, 112: 5738–5743.
  • Limb, R.F., Fuhlendorf, S.D., Engle, D.M. and Miller, R.F., 2016. Synthesis Paper: Assessment of research on rangeland fire as a management practice. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 69: 415-422.
  • Lohbeck, M., Bongers, F., Martinez-raMos, M. and Poorter, L., 2016. The importance of biodiversity and dominance for multiple ecosystem functions in a human- modified tropical landscape. Ecology, 97(10): 2772–2779.
  • Loreau, M., 1998. Separating sampling and other effects inbiodiversity experiments. Oikos, 82: 600–602.
  • Mace, G.M., Norris, K. and Fitter, A.H., 2012. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trend in Ecology and Evolution, 27:19-26.
  • Macek,P., Prieto, I., Macková, J., Pistón, N. and Pugnaire, F.I., 2016. Functional plant types drive plant interactions in a Mediterranean mountain range. Front Plant Sci., 7: 662. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00662. eCollection 2016.
  • Madadi Zadeh, N., Arzani, H., Zahedi, G., Faryabi, N., 2014. Effects of exclosure management on rangelands of Khabr National Park. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Reseach, 21: 138-128.
  • Maguran, A.E.,1988. Ecological diversity and its measurment. Croom Helm Ltd. London.
  • Mallick, P.H. and Chakraborty, S.K., 2018. Forest, wetland and biodiversity: Revealing multi-faceted ecological services from ecorestoration of a degraded tropical landscape, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 18: 278-296.
  • Margalef, M., 1958. Information theory in ecology. General Systematics, 3: 36-71.
  • Mavoa, S., Davern, M., Breed, M. and Hahs, A., 2019. Higher levels of greenness and biodiversity associate with greater subjective wellbeing in adults living in Melbourne, Australia, Health & Place, 57: 321-329.
  • Menhenic, E.F., 1964. A comparison of some species individuals diversity indices applied to sample of field insects. Ecology, 45: 859-861.
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: multiscale assessments. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA
  • Naeem, S. and Li, S., 1997: Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature, 390: 507–509.
  • Naeem, S., Thompson, L.J., Lawler, S.P., Lawton, J.H. and Woodfin, R.M., 1994. Declining biodiversity can alter the performanceof ecosystems. Nature, 368: 734–737.
  • Odum, E.F., 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology, 3rd ed. B. Saundersco, Philadelphia. pp: 574.
  • Omidipour, R., Ebrahimi, A., Tahmasbi, P. and Faramarzi, M., 2019. The relationship between functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence with ecosystem function in a cold steppe rangeland of Marjan, Boroujen. Journal of Rangeland, 13: 504-521.
  • Paquette, A. and Messier, C., 2011. The Effect of biodiversity on tree productivity: From temperate to boreal forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20(1): 170-180.
  • Peet, R.K., 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5: 285-307
  • Pinto, R., de Jong, V.N. and Marques, J.C., 2014. Linking biodiversity indicators, ecosystem functioning, provision ofservices and human well-being in estuarine systems: Application of aconceptual framework, Ecological Indicators, 36: 644– 655.
  • Price, P.W., 1997. Insect Ecology. John Wiley and Sons Inc. New York 874 pp.
  • Reich, P.B., Tilman, D., Isbell, F., Mueller, K., Hobbie, S.E., Flynn, D.F.B. and Eisenhauer, N., 2012. Impacts of biodiversity loss escalatethrough time as redundancy fades. Science, 336: 589–592.
  • Roscher, C., Temperton, V.M., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Schmitz, M., Schumacher, J., Schmid, B., Buchmann, N., Weisser, W. and Detlef, S.E., 2005. Overyielding inexperimental grassland communities — Irrespective of speciespool or spatial scale. Ecology Letters, 8: 576–577.
  • Schmid, B., 2002. The species richness-productivity controversy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17: 113–114.
  • Schnitzer, S.A., Klironomos, J.N., HilleRisLambers, J., Kinkel, L.L., Reich, P.B., Xiao, K., Rillig, M.C., Sikes, B.A., Callaway, R.M., Mangan, S.A., van Nes, E.H. and Scheffer, M., 2011. Soil microbes drivethe classic plant diversity-productivity pattern. Ecology, 92: 296–303.
  • Schwartz, M.W., Brigham, C.A., Hoeksema, J.D., Lyons, K.G., Mills, M.H. and van Mantgem, P.J., 2000: Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology. Oecologia, 122: 297–305.
  • Shannon, C.E. and Weaner, A., 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, 350 pp.
  • Sharafatmandrad, M., Sepehry, A. and Barani, H., 2014. Plant species and functional types’ diversity in relation to grazing in arid and semi-arid rangelands, Khabr national park, Iran. Journal of Rangeland Science, 4: 203-215.
  • Sharifi Jaloudar, H., Mahdavi, M., Juri, M.H. and Moghimi, J., 2010. Effect of rainfall on forage production in semi-arid regions Case study: Rangelands of Siyah Aftab of Semnan Province. Journal of Natural Ecosystemsof Iran, 1: 168-174.
  • Simpson, E.H., 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature, 12:1-20.
  • Smith, M. D. and Knapp, A.K., 2003. Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non-random species loss. Ecology Letters, 6: 509–517.
  • Tamartash, R., 2012. Investigation on the relation between vegetation characters and topographic factors in utilization unites of mountainous rangelands of Vaz., Mazandaran, Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 3: 469-481.
  • Tilman, D., 1990. Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients the ele-ments of a predictive theory of competition.Perspectives on Plant Com-petition(eds J.B. Grace & D. Tilman), pp. 484. Academic Press, NewYork.
  • Tilman, D., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Reich, P., Ritchie, M. and Siemann, E., 1997. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science, 277: 1300–1302.
  • Tilman, D., Reich, P. B., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Mielke, T. and Lehman, C., 2001. Diversity and productivity in a long-termgrassland experiment. Science, 294: 843–845.
  • Tiwari, T.P., Brook, R.M., Wagsta, P. and Sinclair, F.L., 2012. Effects of light environment on maize in hillside agroforestry systems of Nepal. Food Secur., 4: 103–114.
  • Violle, C., Navas, M.-L., Vile, D., Kazakou, E., Fortunel, C., Hummel, I. and Garnier, E., 2007. Let the concept of trait be functional. Journal of Oikos, 116: 882–892.
  • Vogel, A., Scherer-Lorenzen, M. and Weigelt, A., 2012. Grasslandresistance and resilience after drought depends on managementintensity and species richness. PLoS One, 7: e36992. DOI:1371/journal.pone.0036992
  • Waide, R.B., Willig, M.R., Steiner, C.F., Mittelbach, G., Gough, L., Dodson, S.I., Juday, G.P. and Parmenter, R., 1999. The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 30: 257–300.
  • Watt, A.S., 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community. Journal of Ecology, 35:1-22.
  • Wilsey, B.J. and Potvin, C., 2000. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Importance of species evenness in an old field. Journal of Ecology, 81:887-892.
  • Yachi, S. and Loreau, M., 1999: Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 96: 1463.
  • Zhou, Z., Sun, J., Huang, J., Gao, Y. and Han, X., 2006. Land use affects the relationship between species diversity and productivity at the local scale in a Semi-Arid steppe ecosystem. Journal of Functional Ecology, 20: 753-762.

 

 

 

 

 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 757
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 529


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب