| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,196 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,422 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 52,237,953 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 91,772,186 |
پایش و تحلیل شبکه اجتماعی و تعیین کنشگران کلیدی برای مدیریت پایدار منابع طبیعی | ||
| تحقیقات مرتع و بیابان ایران | ||
| مقاله 16، دوره 28، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 82، فروردین 1400، صفحه 181-194 اصل مقاله (963.67 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijrdr.2021.123886 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| رویا وزیریان1؛ علی اکبر کریمیان* 2؛ مهدی قربانی3؛ سیدعلیرضا افشانی4 | ||
| 1دانش آموخته دکتری بیابانزدایی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و کویر شناسی ، دانشگاه یزد، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و کویر شناسی، دانشگاه یزد ، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیار، گروه احیاء مناطق خشک و کوهستانی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران | ||
| 4استاد، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه یزد، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تحلیل شبکه اجتماعی و تعیین کنشگران کلیدی در سیستمهای اجتماعی یکی از اقدامات ضروری برای مدیریت پایدار منابع طبیعی محسوب میشود. هدف از این پژوهش ارزیابی سرمایه اجتماعی، جایگاه و روابط کنشگران در شبکه تبادل اطلاعات و شناخت کنشگران کلیدی در سه روستای استاج، برزو و ایزی موجود در منطقه سبزوار میباشد. بدینمنظور، ابتدا از روش مطالعات کیفی، رویکرد پیمایشی، روش مشاهده مستقیم و مصاحبه جامعه هدف شناسایی گردید. بر اساس نتایج حاصل از محاسبه شاخص مرکزیت بینابینی، درجه ورودی، خروجی و مجاورت در ماتریس اعتماد و مشارکت در آبیاری در سه روستای مورد بررسی، نقش و موقعیت کنشگران در شبکه تعیین و کنشگران کلیدی در شاخصهای مذکور شناسایی شدند. نتایج حاصل نشان داد کنشگران کلیدی از جایگاه اجتماعی، اقتدار و نفوذ بالایی برخوردار بوده و نقش کنترلی و واسطهگری را در روستا به عهده دارند. در نتیجه میتوانند بهعنوان قدرت اجتماعی و رهبران محلی در فرایند تصمیمگیری و ساماندهی شبکه، هماهنگ کردن افراد، برقراری ارتباط بین سایرین، دستیابی به منابع و اطلاعات و سرعت تبادل آنها، حل اختلافات و درگیریها، توسعه اعتماد در شبکه و در نتیجه افزایش سرمایه اجتماعی نقش اساسی ایفا نمایند. افزایش میزان سرمایه اجتماعی بهعنوان کلیدی ترین ابزار مدیریتی موجب استقرار مدیریت پایدار منابع طبیعی خواهد شد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| سرمایه اجتماعی؛ شاخص مرکزیت؛ قدرت اجتماعی؛ اعتماد؛ مشارکت | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Monitoring and analyzing social networks and identifying key actors for sustainable management of natural resources | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Roya Vazirian1؛ Aliakbar Karimian2؛ Mehdi Ghorbani3؛ Seyed Alireza Afshani4 | ||
| 11- PhD Graduated in Combat Desertification, Faculty of Natural Resources and Desertology, Yazd University, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Faculty of Natural Resources and Desertology, Yazd University, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Department of Rehabilitation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran | ||
| 44- Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, Yazd University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Social network analysis and identification of key actors in social systems is one of the necessary measures for the sustainable management of natural resources. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the social capital, status, and relationships of actors in the information exchange network and their structural pattern and to identify key actors in the three villages of Estaj, Borzu, and Izi in Sabzevar. For this purpose, first, qualitative studies of survey approach, direct observation method, and target population interview were identified. Based on the results of calculating the intermediate centrality index, the degree of input, output, and proximity in the trust matrix and participation in irrigation in the three villages studied, the role and position of actors were identified, and key actors were identified in these indexes. The results showed key actors have a high social status, authority, and influence and play a role of control and intermediary in the village. As a result, they can as social power and local leaders play a key role in the decision-making and networking processing, coordinating individuals, communicating with others, accessing resources and information, and speeding up their exchange, resolving disputes and conflicts, trust in the network and thus increase social capital. Increasing the amount of social capital as the key management tool will lead to the establishment of sustainable management of natural resources. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Social capital, centrality index, social power, trust, participation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
- Adams, W.M., Aveling, R., Brockington, D., Dickson, B., Elliott, J., Hutton, J., Roe, D., Vira, B. and Wolmer, W., 2004. Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Journal of Science, 306 (5699):1146-1149. - Arnette, A., Zobel, C., Bosch, D., Pease, J. and Metcalfe, T., 2010. Stakeholder ranking of watershed goals with the vector analytic hierarchy process: Effects of participant grouping scenarios. Journal of Environmental Modelling & Software, 25:1459–1469. - Bodin, Ö. and Crona, B.I., 2009. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference. Journal of Global Environmental Change, 19 (3):366-374. - Bodin, O. and Norberg, J., 2005. Information network topologies for enhanced local adaptive management. Journal of Environmental Management, 35:175–193. - Bodin, O. and Prell, C., 2011. Social networks and natural resource management: uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 374p. - Brandes, S.P. and Erlebach, T.H., 2005. Network analysis- Methodological foundation. Springer,Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 472p. - Brechin, S.R., Wilshusen, P.R., Fortwangler, C.L. and West, P.C., 2002. Beyond the square wheel: toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political process. Journal of Society &Natural Resources, 15 (1):41-64. - Burt, R.S., 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University press, Cambridge, 324p. - Cárcamo, F., Flühmann, R. and Gaymer, F., 2014. Collaboration and knowledge networks in coastal resources management: How critical stakeholders interact for multiple-use marine protected area implementation. Journal of Ocean & Coastal Management, 91: 5-16. - Carlsson, L. and Sandström, A., 2008. Network governance of the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 2(1):33–54. - Chung, M.H. and Labianca, G., 2004. Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (6):860-875. - Degenne, A. and Forsé, M., 2011. Introducing social networks, Sage Publications, London, 365p. - Freeman, L.C., 2014. The development of social network analysis-With an emphasis on recent events. The sage handbook of social network analysis, 21(3):26-39. - Ghorbani, M., Azarnivand, H., Mehrabi, A.A., Bastani, S., Jafari, M. and Nayebi, H., 2013. Social network analysis: A new approach in policy-making and planning of natural resources comanagement. Journal of Rangeland and Watershed mangement, 65 (4):553-568. - Ghorbani, M., 2012. The role of social networks in operation mechanisms of Rangeland (Case Study: Taleghan area), Ph.D. thesis, Department of Natural Resources, Tehran University, 430 p. - Hanneman, R.A., 2001. Introduction to Social Network Methods. University of California, Riverside, California. 149 p. - Hanneman, R.A. and Riddle, M., 2005. Introduction to social network methods. University of California, Riverside, California. 343 p. - Hirschi, C., 2010. Strengthening Regional Cohesion: Collaborative Networks and Sustainable Development in Swiss Rural Areas. Journal of Ecology and Society, 15(4):16. - Kim, S.E. and Lee, J.W., 2010. Impact of competing accountability requirements on perceived work performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 529-557. - Koontz, T.M., 2006. Collaboration for Sustainability A Framework for Analyzing Government Impacts in Collaborative Environmental Management. Journal of Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 2(1):15-24. - Leroux, K., 2009. Managing stakeholder demands. Balancing responsiveness to client and funding agents in nonprofit social service organizations. Journal of Administration and Society, 41:158–184. - Lienert J., Schnetzer F. and Ingold K., 2013. Stakeholder Analysis Combined With Social Network Analysis Provides Fine-Grained Insights in to War Infrastructure Planing Processes. Journal of Environmental Management, 11(125):134-148. - Mohammadi Kangrany, H., Ghonchepour. D. and Shirgah, F., 2010. Relationship between forests and water in the basin of the Tigris and Euphrates and suggest some strategies for integrated management of watersheds. 2th Conference on Integrated Water Resources Management. French, 24-26 March: 145-154. - Prell, C., Hubacek, K. and Reed, M., 2009. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Journal of Society and Natural Resources, 22(6):501-518. - Reed, M.S., 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Journal of Biological conservation, 141(10):2417-2431. - Sandström, A. and Rova, C., 2010. The network structure of adaptive governance: a single case study of a fish management area. International Journal of the Commons, 4(1):528-551. - Smith, J.M., Halgin, D.S., Kidwell-Lopez, V., Labianca, G., Brass, D.J. and Borgatti, S.P., 2014. Power in politically charged networks. Journal of Social Networks, 36:162-176. - Stein, C., Ernstson, H. and Barron, J., 2011. A social network approach to analyzing water governance: The case of the Mkindo catchment, Tanzania. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 36:1085–1092. - Van Eeten, M.J.G., Daniel, P. Loucks and Emery, R.O., 2002. Bringing actors together around largescale water systems: participatory modeling and other innovations. Journal of Knowledge, Technology, and Policy, 14(4):94-108. - Wasserman, S. and Faust, K., 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge university press, 825p. - Wellman, B. and Frank, K. 2001. Network capital in a multilevel world: Getting support from personal communities Social Capital. Journal of Theory and Research , Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 233-273.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,551 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 798 |
||