| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,168 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,197 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 50,943,323 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 90,948,456 |
اثر ردیف کارها با آرایش کاشت مختلف بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد بادام زمینی در مغان | ||
| تحقیقات سامانهها و مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 22، شماره 79، آذر 1400، صفحه 33-46 اصل مقاله (966.89 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/amsr.2021.352960.1372 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| جبراییل تقی نژاد* 1؛ کرامت اخوان1؛ حسین زینل زاده تبریزی2 | ||
| 1استادیار بخش تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اردبیل (مغان)، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اردبیل، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اردبیل (مغان)، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اردبیل، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| با توجه به توسعه کشت بادامزمینی در سالهای اخیر در منطقه مغان، که هم اکنون سطح زیر کاشت سالانه آن بیش از 6000 هکتار است. پژوهشی به منظور بررسی آرایشهای کشت مختلف با استفاده ازچند مدل ردیفکار پنوماتیک انجام گردید. این آزمایش در سال 1399، در قالب طرح بلوکهای کامل تصادفی با شش تیمار و چهار تکرار انجام شد. تیمارها شامل a1 و a2 - کاشت یک ردیفه با فاصله بین پشته 75 سانتیمتر و بین بوته بهترتیب 12و 17 سانتیمتر، a3 و a4 - کاشت دو ردیف روی پشته با فاصله بین پشته 75 سانتیمتر و بین بوته بهترتیب 22 و 28 سانتیمتر و a5 و a6 - کاشت یک ردیفه با فاصله بین پشته 50 سانتیمتر و بین بوته بهترتیب 25 و30 سانتیمتر بود. شاخصهای مورد بررسی عبارت بودند از درصد شکستگی بذر، یکنواختی توزیع افقی و عمودی بذر، درصد سبزشدن بذرها، ظرفیت موثر مزرعهای، عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد. نتایج نشان داد تفاوت بین تیمارها از نظر ضریب یکنواختی توزیع افقی بذر، ظرفیت مزرعهای، درصد جوانهزنی بذر، قطر غلاف و طول غلاف در سطح 1 درصد و از نظر ارتفاع بوته، تعداد غلاف در بوته، عملکرد غلاف و دانه در سطح 5 درصد معنیدار بود. اثر تیمارها بر وزن صددانه و صدمات مکانیکی وارده به بذر معنیدار نبود. بیشترین مقدار یکنواختی توزیع افقی و سبز شدن بذرها بهترتیب به میزان25/79 و 2/95 درصد و بیشترین عملکرد به میزان 30/4995 کیلوگرم در هکتار از تیمار کاشت دو ردیف با فاصله بین بوته 28 سانتیمتر بدست آمد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| بذرکار پنوماتیک؛ تراکم کاشت؛ عملکرد غلاف | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effect of Row Planters with Different Planting Pattern on Yield and Yield Components of Peanut in Moghan | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| jabraeil taghinazhad1؛ keramat Akhavan1؛ hossin zeinalzadeh2 | ||
| 1Researcher of mechanizationAcademic member, Department of Agricultural Engineering Research, Ardabil Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Ardabil, Iran | ||
| 2Academic member, Department of seed and Plant improvement insatiate, Ardabil Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Ardabil, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In recent years, the cultivation of peanuts has increased in the Moghan region, which currently has an annual planting area of more than 6,000 hectares. This study was performed to select the most suitable planter with the desired planting pattern. The experimental design was carried out in a randomized complete block design with six treatments and four replications, in 2020. Treatments include a1 and a2, planting with a distance between rows (ridges) of 75 cm and between plants (12 and 17 cm), respectively, a3 and a4, twine planting with a distance between rows of 75 cm and between plants (22 and 28 cm), respectively, and a5 and a6 , planting was one row with a distance between rows of 50 cm and between plants (25 and 30 cm), respectively. Parameters measured were uniformity of seed depth, planter field capacity, seed germination, mechanical damage to seed, yield and yield components of peanut. The results indicated that planter type was significant at the 1% probability level for uniformity of seed lateral, planter field capacity and seed germination and at the 5% probability level for Number of pods per plant and peanut yield. However, there was no significant effect on 100-seed weight and mechanical damage to seeds. It was found that planting with a two-row pneumatic planter obtains the best results in terms of green percentage uniformity, seed cross distribution and yield. The highest uniformity of horizontal distribution and germination of seeds were 79.25% and 95%, respectively. The maximum yield in this tow row planter was 4995.30 kg.ha-1 with a distance between plants of 28cm. Therefore, compared to planting a row with a distance between the ridges of 75 cm, the average yield was increase 400 kg.ha-1. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Planting Density, Pneumatic Planter, Pod Yield | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Afzalinia, S. (1995). Evaluation and comparison of two row planter in Fars province (M. Sc. Thesis), Faculty of Agriculture. Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. (in Persian)
Ahmadi, A., Jaberi Moez, M., & Ahmadvand, G. (2008). Evaluation of different planter in relation to seed flow rate, germination, planting depth and uniformity of canola seed distribution. Proceedings of the 5th National Congress of Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization. April 27, University of Mashhad Ferdowsi, Mashhad, Iran. (in Persian)
Anon. (1994). Test codes & procedures for farm machinery. Technical Series. No. 12.
Anon. (2016). SPSS for Windows, version 24. IBM Corp Armonk (NY). IBM Corporation.
Blum A. (1999). Towards standard assay of drought resistance in crop plants. In: J. M. Ribaut & D. Poland. Molecular approaches for the genetic improvement of cereals for stable production in water-limited environments. Research Report. A Strategic Planning Workshop, June 21-25. CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico.
Emadi, B., Nikkhah A., Khojastehpour, M., & Peyman, S. H. (2014). The effect of farm size on energy consumption and input costs of peanut production in Guilan province. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 5(1), 217-227. (in Persian)
Ghasemnejad Maleki, H. M. (2017). Filed evaluation of mechanized cultivation planters of rapeseed in Shoushtar region. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Plant Production, 8(2), (in Persian).
Guilani, A. (2001). Evaluation of the effects of planting density and fertilizer on rice (LD183). Research Report. Khuzestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center. Ahvaz, Iran. (in Persian)
Harrigan, T., & Smyrillis, A. (2000). Sugar beet planter evaluation. Michigan State University Extension, Agricultural Engineering Information Series No. 665.
Hosseinzade Gashti, A. R., Isfahani, M., Asghari, J., Safarzade Vishkaee, M. N., & Rabiee, B. (2009). Effect of sulphur application on growth index and yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 13(48), 27-39. (in Persian)
Keith, S. (2000). Sugar Beet. UC Cooperative Extension, USA.
Khosranani, E., Javadi, A., & Zarif Neshat, S. (2006). Technical evaluation of numerical and mechanical seeders common in sugar beet cultivation. Proceedings of the Fourth National Congress of Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization. Aug. 29-30, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. (in Persian)
Padasht Dehgahei. M. N. (2016). Agronomic and morphological characteristics of peanut genotypes in Guilan province. Research Report. Seed and Plant Breeding Research Institute, Karaj, Iran. (in Persian)
Rahmati, M. H., & Haji Ahmad, A. (2008). Modification and comparison of a tomato seed pneumatic planter with a mechanical planter. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 14(6), 98-108. (in Persian)
Safarzadeh Vishgahei, M. N. (1999). The effect of methanol on the growth and yield of peanuts (Ph. D. Thesis), Islamic Azad University, Research Sciences Branch, Tehran. (in Persian)
Scott Tubbs, R., Beasley Jr, John P., K. Culbreath, A., C. Kemerait, R., B. Smith, N., & R. Smith, A. (2011). Row Pattern and Seeding Rate Effects on Agronomic, Disease, and Economic Factors in Large-Seeded Runner Peanut. Peanut Science, 38(2), 93-100.
Senapati, P. C., Mohapatra, P. K., & Setpathly, D. (1988). Field performance of seeding devices in rain fed situation in orissa, India. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, 19(1), 35-38.
Senapati. P.C., Mohapatra, P. K., & Dikshit, U. N. (1992). Field evaluation of seeding devices for finger- millet. A. M. A. 23(3), 21-24.
Taghinazhad, J. (2017). Comparison of technical and economic effect of different planters using varied seed rates on canola yield in Moghan region. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 7(2), 527-535. (in Persian)
Taghinazhad, J. (2019). Mechanization of peanuts in Moghan plain. Technical Report. Research Institute of Agricultural Engineering. No. 56307. (in Persian)
Taghinazhad, J., & Mesri, T. (2014). Technical evaluation of three planters with different cropping pattern on soybean yield in Moghan. Agricultural Mechanization. 1, 59-66. (in Persian)
Taki, O. (2005). Development of direct drill with active opener for using in no tillage systems. Research Report. No. 96/1367. Isfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Isfahan , Iran. (in Persian)
Wehtje, G., Weeks, R., West, M., Wells, L., & Pace, P. (1994). Influence of planter type and seeding rate on yield and disease incidence in peanut. Peanut Science, 21, 16-19.
Yasir, S. H., Liao, Q., Yu, J., & He, D. (2012). Design and test of a pneumatic precision metering device for wheat. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal. 14(1), 16-25.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 876 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 398 |
||