News

a.z
Ekhtesasi, M., Chezgi, J., Khajavi, M. (2021). Evaluation of watershed management projects and offering appropriate strategy and solution for their development using SWOT and AHP model in arid and semi-arid regions. , 13(1), 55-64. doi: 10.22092/ijwmse.2020.127843.1721
Mohammad areza Ekhtesasi; Javad Chezgi; Maryam Khajavi. "Evaluation of watershed management projects and offering appropriate strategy and solution for their development using SWOT and AHP model in arid and semi-arid regions". , 13, 1, 2021, 55-64. doi: 10.22092/ijwmse.2020.127843.1721
Ekhtesasi, M., Chezgi, J., Khajavi, M. (2021). 'Evaluation of watershed management projects and offering appropriate strategy and solution for their development using SWOT and AHP model in arid and semi-arid regions', , 13(1), pp. 55-64. doi: 10.22092/ijwmse.2020.127843.1721
Ekhtesasi, M., Chezgi, J., Khajavi, M. Evaluation of watershed management projects and offering appropriate strategy and solution for their development using SWOT and AHP model in arid and semi-arid regions. , 2021; 13(1): 55-64. doi: 10.22092/ijwmse.2020.127843.1721

Evaluation of watershed management projects and offering appropriate strategy and solution for their development using SWOT and AHP model in arid and semi-arid regions

مهندسی و مدیریت آبخیز
Article 5, Volume 13, Issue 1, April 2021, Pages 55-64    PDF (755.17 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22092/ijwmse.2020.127843.1721
Authors
Mohammad areza Ekhtesasi1; Javad Chezgi* 2; Maryam Khajavi1
1Yazd University
2University of Birjand
Abstract
Evaluation of watershed management projects today is one of the most fundamental issues being addressed in countries for future planning in the field of natural resource management projects. The results of evaluating watershed projects by presenting a strategy and strategy should reduce future problems and costs. In this study, hierarchical analysis method and SWOT analytical model were used to evaluate and present the strategy. In this study 4 main criteria (reduction of erosion, flood reduction, increase of vegetation covers and increase of sewage discharge) and 8 sub-criteria were used. Then the final weight of each criterion and sub-criteria were determined using Expert choice software. The results showed that erosion reduction criterion with relative importance of 0.482 had the most impact on watershed projects. SWOT model results in the region indicated that the region's conditions were in the fourth quarter, WT or defensive strategy. To this end, strategies for mitigating threats and addressing regional weaknesses were presented using the region's potentials and opportunities, and prioritized using expert opinions. 8 strategies were identified and evaluated based on the potential of the area and the evaluation of implemented projects. The best management strategies to build coastal walls around the gardens in collaboration with locals with a final score of 0.28 were the first priority and a strategy to improve and increase the height of the dam overflow. Constructed with 0.02 points was the last priority.
Keywords
Watershed management Projects; Strategy; AHP Model; SWOT Model; Kerman Province
References
  1. Afkhami, H. Providing appropriate management strategy using SWAT-QSPM integrated model with the purpose of nomad organization, case study: Gaud Arabi Taheri Tabas. Journal of Watershed Development and Development, 6(23): 1-11.
  2. Ahmadi, H., A. Nazari Samani, J. Goddess andR. Ekhtesasi. 2003. Presenting a model for assessing watershed management plans. Journal of Natural Resources of Iran, 56(4): 1-15.
  3. Amobeigi, A. and D. Hayati. 2013. Evaluation of the effects of implementation of the integrated management of natural resources and watershed management of West Shiraz Watershed on the environment of the region from the Operators' point of view. Journal of Environmental Science, 11(1): 1-21.
  4. Asgharpur, M.J. 2008. Multidisciplinary decision making. Tehran University Press, 400 pages.
  5. Azamirard, M., K. Esmaeili and H. Taghvaei. 2013. Evaluation of the performance of the Nari Watershed management, Fariman. 9th National Conference of Watershed Management Sciences and Engineering, Yazd University.
  6. Bani Habib, M. and N. Chitsaz. 2015. Use of agreement planning model in optimal flood management decision making. Iranian Journal of Water Research, 3: 87-79.
  7. Chezgi, J., H. Maleki Nejad, M. Ekhtesasi and M. Nakhaie. 2018. Comprehensive and suitable strategy for the development of subterranean dam construction of SWOT model and quantitative matrix QSPM, case study: Currant Basin. Journal of Water and Soil Science, (Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources), 22(1): 1-12.
  8. Darabi, M., H. Gharadaghi and M. Nejabat. 2018. Evaluation of watershed projects performance on erosion and sediment transport in Sivand Dam Watershed, Fars Province, Iran. Hydrogeomorphology Journal, 14(4): 199-218 (in Persian).
  9. Esmaili, A. and H. Abdullahi. 2010. Watershed and soil conservation (second edition). Mohaghegh Ardebili Publication, 574 pages.
  10. He, C. 2003. Integration of geographic information systems and simulation model for watershed management. Environmental Modelling and Software, 18: 809–813.
  11. Hofer, B.K. 2006. Domain specificity of personal epistemology: Resolved questions, persistent issues, new models. International Journal of Educational Research, 45: 85-95.
  12. Jain, S.K. and F. Dolezal. 2000. Modeling soil erosion using EPIC supported by GIS, Bohemia, Czech Republic. Journal of Environmental Hydrology, 8: 1-11.
  13. Jomehpour, M. 2010. Introduction to rural development planning: views and methods. Tehran Samt Publications, 125 pages.
  14. Li, L., S. Du, L. Wu and G. Liu. 2009. An overview of soil loss tolerance. Catena, 78(2009): 93–99.
  15. Mousavi, S.I. 2001. Soil and mechanism of erosion and protective measures. Tobayan Journal, 40: 45-53.
  16. Parhizkar, M. and A. Ghafari Gilandare. 2006. Multi-criteria decision making using GIS. Sovrn Publishing, 508 pages.
  17. Qodousi, J. 2000. Evaluation of watershed projects. Final Report of Soil and Watershed Research Center, Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, 75 pages .
  18. Radwan, A. 1999. Flood analysis and mitigation for an area in Jordan. Journal of Water Resources and Management, 125(3): 170-177 (in Persian).
  19. Rahimi, M., M. Sufi and H. Ahmadi. 2011. Evaluation of watershed measure impacts using WOCAT program in the Nasim-Abad Watershed, Southwest of Shiraz. Journal of Irrigation and Water Engineering, 6: 37-46 (in Persian).
  20. Refahi, H. 2005. Water erosion and control. Tehran University Press, 552 pages.
  21. Rezaei, Kh. 2018. Estimation of susceptibility mapping to erosion based on tree decision-making, Case study: Semnan watershed basin. Stratigraphic and Sedimentary Studies, 70(1): 36-49.
  22. Saaty, T.L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, NewYork, 136 pages.
  23. Solmanpour, S.M., A. Shearobafi and M. Zolfaghari. 2013. Evaluation and comparison of biological and biological activities using the Wocat program, case study: Shib Tablage village located in southwest of Shiraz. 9th National Congress of Science and Technology, Iran Watershed Engineering, Yazd University.
  24. Teymouri, M. and M. Omrani. 2010. Investigating the performance of watershed projects, case study: Keshir Watershed. 6th National Conference on Watershed Management Sciences and Engineering of Iran. April 26-27, Tarbiat Modares University.
Statistics
Article View: 1,250
PDF Download: 490


counter
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb