News

a.z
Seyed Jalali, S., Dehghan, R., Azadi, A., Zaeinaldini Mimand, A., Navidi, M., Mohammad Esmaeil, Z. (2020). Investigation of the Effect of Soil Factors on Sugarcane Growth in Sugarcane Cultivated Lands in Khuzestan and Mazandaran Provinces. , 34(3), 343-357. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2020.343172.532
Seyed Alireza Seyed Jalali; Ramazanali Dehghan; Abolfazl Azadi; Ali Zaeinaldini Mimand; Mirnaser Navidi; Zahra Mohammad Esmaeil. "Investigation of the Effect of Soil Factors on Sugarcane Growth in Sugarcane Cultivated Lands in Khuzestan and Mazandaran Provinces". , 34, 3, 2020, 343-357. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2020.343172.532
Seyed Jalali, S., Dehghan, R., Azadi, A., Zaeinaldini Mimand, A., Navidi, M., Mohammad Esmaeil, Z. (2020). 'Investigation of the Effect of Soil Factors on Sugarcane Growth in Sugarcane Cultivated Lands in Khuzestan and Mazandaran Provinces', , 34(3), pp. 343-357. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2020.343172.532
Seyed Jalali, S., Dehghan, R., Azadi, A., Zaeinaldini Mimand, A., Navidi, M., Mohammad Esmaeil, Z. Investigation of the Effect of Soil Factors on Sugarcane Growth in Sugarcane Cultivated Lands in Khuzestan and Mazandaran Provinces. , 2020; 34(3): 343-357. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2020.343172.532

Investigation of the Effect of Soil Factors on Sugarcane Growth in Sugarcane Cultivated Lands in Khuzestan and Mazandaran Provinces

پژوهش های خاک
Article 4, Volume 34, Issue 3, December 2020, Pages 343-357    PDF (807.71 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22092/ijsr.2020.343172.532
Authors
Seyed Alireza Seyed Jalali* 1; Ramazanali Dehghan2; Abolfazl Azadi3; Ali Zaeinaldini Mimand4; Mirnaser Navidi1; Zahra Mohammad Esmaeil5
1Assistant Professor, Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran
2Research Instructor, Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO)
3Assistant Professor, Khuzestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO)
4Assistant Professor, Soil and Water research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO)
5Researcher, Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of soil characteristics on sugarcane yield and to revise the “Table of Soil and Landscape Requirements for Sugarcane”. For this purpose, 120 points in different areas under sugarcane cultivation in Khuzestan and Mazandaran provinces were studied based on diversity in soil characteristics. Parametric methods were used in this study to determine the land index. For data analysis, multivariate regression by stepwise method and simple regression were used. Sugarcane yield was considered as a dependent variable and factors including salinity, percentage of exchangeable sodium, soil acidity, gypsum, lime, clay, sand and silt, as independent variables. Then, by examining the simple regression between important and effective land characteristics with sugarcane yield, the relevant equations and diagrams were drawn and soil properties were rated by FAO method. The results showed that exchangeable sodium, clay, lime, acidity, and salinity, in decreasing order, had a significant correlation with yield of sugarcane, while and the variables of sand and silt had no significant correlation. Multivariate regression coefficient analysis showed that the variables entered in the model were able to explain 67% of the variance related to the dependent variable. In simple regression equations, soil salinity, exchangeable sodium content, and lime had a decreasing effect on yield. The variables of exchangeable sodium percentage and soil salinity had the greatest effect on sugarcane yield. The proposed table on sugarcane soil and landscape requirements was evaluated and validated by using soil data and yields of 30 sugarcane fields that had not been used to extract this table. The coefficient of determination between the sugarcane yield and the land index was about 0.81, indicating the acceptable accuracy of the table.
Keywords
Land index; Soil characteristics; Exchangeable sodium; Sugarcane yield
References
  1. زین الدینی، ع1392.. مطالعات تناسب سرزمین کیفی محصولات مهم زراعی و باغی منطقه شهداد (استان کرمان). نشریه شماره 1654. موسسه تحقیقات خاک.
  2. زین الدینی، ع.، تومانیان، ن.، نویدی، م.ن.، فرج نیا، ا. و سیدجلالی، س. ع.ر.. 1398. کتاب نیازهای رویشی گیاهان باغی. مؤسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب. سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی. وزارت جهاد کشاورزی. انتشارات مؤسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب. 310 ص.
  3. سلطانی، ا. 1380. احتمالات و آمار برای علوم و مهندسی. چاپ دوم، انتشارات دانشگاه شیراز، 376 صفحه.
  4. سیدجلالی، س.ع.، زارعیان، ع.، زین الدینی، ع.، و سعادتمند، غ. b1386. تعیین تناسب اراضی و تخمین پتانسیل تولید گندم در خاکهای گچی استانهای خوزستان، فارس، اصفهان و کرمان، نشریه فنی شماره 1345، موسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب.
  5. سیدجلالی، س.ع.، زارعیان، ع.، زین الدینی، ع، سعادتمند، غ. و بنی نعمه، ج. a 1386. تعیین تناسب اراضی و تخمین پتانسیل تولید گندم در خاکهای آهکی استانهای خوزستان، فارس، اصفهان و کرمان، نشریه فنی شماره 1341، موسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب.
  6. سیدجلالی، ع.ر.، زین­الدینی، ع.، نویدی، م.ن.، محمداسماعیل، ز. 1398. نیازهای رویشی گیاهان مهم زراعی کشور. موسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب.
  7. عماری، پ. و همکاران. 1388. درجه بندی ویژگی های سرزمین و نیازهای رویشی گردو تناسب سرزمین در استان آذربایجان شرقی، موسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب، نشریه فنی شماره 1429.
  8. غیاثوند، ا. 1391. کاربرد آمار و نرم‎افزار SPSS در تحلیل داده‎ها. چاپ چهارم، انتشارات متفکران، 282 صفحه.
  9. فرج نیا، ا. 1391. ارزیابی کیفی تناسب سرزمین برای محصولات عمده زارعی در دشت هرزندات مرند استان آذربایجان ‎شرقی. نشریه شماره 1825. موسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب.
  10. قائمیان، ن. و همکاران. 1388. درجه بندی ویژگی های سرزمین و نیازهای رویشی بادام جهت تهیه جداول پایه تناسب سرزمین در استان آذربایجان غربی، موسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب، نشریه فنی شماره 1430.
  11. قائمیان، ن. و همکاران. 1389. طبقه بندی ویژگی های سرزمین و نیازهای رویشی سیب جهت تهیه جداول پایه تناسب سرزمین در استان آذربایجان غربی، موسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب، نشریه فنی شماره 1509.
  12. گیوی، ج. 1376. ارزیابی کیفی تناسب اراضی برای نباتات زراعی و باغی. نشریه شماره 1015. مؤسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب. تهران. 100ص.
  13. محمدی، ج.1385. پدومتری: آمار کلاسیک. جلد اول، انتشارات پلک، تهران، 532 صفحه.و آب.
  14. وزارت جهاد کشاورزی. 1396. آمارنامه کشاورزی.معاونت برنامه­ریزی و اقتصادی. دفتر آمار و فناوری اطلاعات وزارت جهاد کشاورزی، تهران.
  15. Armanto, M. 2019. Soil Variability and Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Biomass along Ultisol Toposequences. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 20(7).‏
  16. Arshad, M., Li, N., Zhao, D., Sefton, M., & Triantafilis, J. (2019). Comparing management zone maps to address infertility and sodicity in sugarcane fields. Soil and Tillage Research, 193, 122-132.‏
  17. Bernstein, L., Clark, R.A., Francois, L.E., Derderian, M.D., 1966. Salt tolerance of NCo varieties of sugar cane. II. Effects of soil salinity and sprinkling on chemical composition. Agron.J. 58, 503–507.
  18. FAO statistic. 2017. Available: http// faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx.
  19. FAO. 1976. A Framework for Land Evaluation.
  20. Gomathi, R., P.N. 2015. Gururaja Rao, K. Chandran and A. Selvi: Adaptive responses of sugarcane to waterlogging stress: An overview.Sugar Tech., 17, 325–338.
  21. Jaiphong, T., J. Tominaga, K. Watanabe, R. Suwa, M. 2017. Ueno and Y.Kawamitsu: Changes in photosynthesis, growth and sugar content of commercial sugarcane cultivars and Erianthus under flood conditions. Plant Prod. Sci., 20, 126-135.
  22. Lingle, S.E., Wiedenfeld, R.P., Irvine, J.E., 2000. Sugarcane response to saline irrigation water. J. Plant Nutr. 23,469–486.
  23. Lingle, S.E., Wiegand, C.L., 1997. Soil salinity and sugarcane juice quality. Field Crop Res. 54, 259–26.
  24. Maas, E.V., Hoffman, G.J., 1977. Crop salt tolerance—current assessment. J. Irrig. Drain. Div., ASCE 103, 115–134.
  25. Rozeff, N., 1998. Sugarcane irrigation management. In: Rozeff, N., Amador, J.M., Irvine, J.E. (Eds.), South Texas Sugarcane Production Handbook. Texas A&M University Research & Extension Center at Weslaco, and Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers Inc., Santa Rosa, TX.
  26. Singh, S; Singh, S P; Pathak, A D; Pandey, N. 2019  Assessment of waterlogging induced physiobiochemical changes in sugarcane varieties and its association with waterlogging tolerance
  27. Sys, C, E,Van Ranst. J. Debaveye. 1991. Land evaluation, Part I and II. GeneralAdmhnstration for  development coopration ,Brussels.
  28. Sys, C, E,Van Ranst. J. Debaveye.1993. Land evaluation, Part III. Crop requitements. General Admhnstration for  development coopration ,Brussels.
  29. U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff., 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. USDA Agriculture Handbook No. 60.
  30. Viator, R. P., Jr. P. M. White, A. J. Hale and H. L. 2012. Waguespack: Screening for tolerance to periodic flooding for cane grown for sucrose and bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy, 44, 56–63.
  31. Wiedenfeld, B., Enciso, J., Fipps, G., Robinson, J., 2005. Irrigation of sugarcane in Texas. Texas Cooperative Extension and Texas Agricultural Experiment Station B-6156. p. 15
  32. Wiegand, C., Anderson, G., Lingle, S., Escobar, D., 1996. Soil salinity effects on crop growth and yield—illustration of an analysis and mapping methodology for sugarcane. J. Plant Physiol. 148, 418–424.
  33. Zeinadini Meymand,A., Bagheri Bodaghabadi, M., Moghimi, A., Navidi, M.N., Ebrahimi Meymand, F., Amir Pour,M. 2018. Modeling of yield and rating of land characteristics for corn based on artificial neural network and regression models in southern Iran.  Desert 23-1. pp: 85-95.
Statistics
Article View: 1,031
PDF Download: 831


counter
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb