Economic effects of bent leg cultivator on sugar beet crop production | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| Article 5, Volume 36, Issue 1, April 2020, Pages 47-55 PDF (739.02 K) | ||
| Document Type: Scientific - Research | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/jsb.2020.342813.1238 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Aliakbar Solhjou* 1; Ebrahim Zareh2; Mohsen Bazrafshan3 | ||
| 1Assistant professor of Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO), Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate professor of Agronomy, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO), Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| 3Assistant professor of Sugar Beet Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO) Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Mechanical control of weeds in the field can reduce the environmental concerns caused by high application and costs of herbicides. This study was performed to determine the technical and economic effect of new bent leg cultivator on sugar beet yield. The study included seven treatments of bent leg cultivator with 45 mm blade width, bent leg cultivator with 45 mm blade width + furrower, bent leg cultivator with 65 mm blade width, bent leg cultivator with 65 mm blade width + furrower, conventional cultivator (crescent blade), control of weed in all seasons, and without weed control performed in randomized complete block design with three replications. In order to evaluate the technical and economic effect of cultivators on sugar beet yield, sugar beet root yield parameters, sugar content, sugar yield, income and cost of treatments were measured and using the marginal net profit analysis method, the economic return on investment of each method in weed control were obtained compared with other methods. Results showed that the economically appropriate treatment was bent leg cultivator with 65 mm width + furrower. Results also showed that the new technology of bent leg cultivator has the potential to increase weed control along with increasing crop yield as well as farmer’s net profit. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Crescent cultivator; Sugar content; Weed; Yield | ||
| References | ||
|
Afzalinia S, Niromand Jahromi M, Mohammadi D. The effect of row crop cultivator types on sugar beet yield and quality. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 2008; 9(2): 57-68 (in Persian, abstract in English). Boutsalis P, Preston C, Gill G. Current levels of herbicide resistance in broad acre farming across southern Australia. Proceeding of the Sixteenth Australian Weeds Conference, Queensland, Australia. 2008; 18-22 May. Chauhan BS, Gill G, Preston C. Influence of tillage systems on vertical distribution, seeding recruitment and persistence of rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) seed bank. Weed Science. 2006; 54(4): 669-676. Cousens RD, Moss SR. A model of the effects of cultivation on the vertical distribution of weed seeds within the soil. Weed Research. 1990; 30(1): 61-70. Dillan JL, Hardaker G. Farm management research for small farmer development. Translated by A. H. Chizari. Garmsar Islamic Azad University. 2000. 288p. (in Persian) Goddard T, Zoebisch M, Gan Y, Ellis W, Watson A, Sombatpanit S. No-Till Farming Systems. World Association of Soil and Water Conservation. 2008. Mohler CL. A model of the effect of tillage on emergence of weed seedling. Ecological Applications. 1993. 3(1): 53-73. Nosrati I, Dabbagh Mohammadi Nassab A, Amini R, Shakiba MR. Efficacy of different integrated weed management methods in rain-fed Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) at Kermanshah. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 2018; 28(4): 77-92. Parizkari A, Sabihi M. Effects of technology development and mechanization on agricultural production in Qazvin province. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research. 2014; 5(20): 1-23. Safari M, Najafi H. Evaluation of different cultivator’s performance to control of weeds in sugar beet cultivation. Journal of Agriculture. 2008; 10(2): 91-98. Solhjou A, Bazrafshan M, Ghezeli F. Effect of bent leg cultivator on weed control and sugar beet yield. Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research. In Press. (in Persian, abstract in English) Solhjou A, Jamali MR, Jokar L. Furrow opener geometry effect on weed seed bank. Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research. 2017; 18(69): 19-30. (in Persian, abstract in English) Staricka JA, Burford PM, Allmaras RR, Nelson WW. Tracing the vertical distribution of simulated shattered seeds as related to tillage. Agronomy Journal. 1990; 82(6): 1131-1134. Steven RW, Wiese A. Competition of annual weeds and sugar beets. Journal of the ASSBT. 1976; 19(2): 125-129. Walsh MJ, Powles SB. Management strategies for herbicide- resistant weed populations in Australian dryland crop production systems. Weed Technology. 2007; 21(2): 332-338. Zareh A, Shahrokhnia MA. The using AHP method for selecting the best irrigation planning method in citrus orchards in Fars Province. Third national symposium of comprehensive management of water resources. 2012. 11-12 Sep, Sari Agriculture and Natural Resources University. Sari, Mazanderan Province, Iran. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 802 PDF Download: 410 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb