| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,168 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,197 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 50,943,827 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 90,949,003 |
هضم بی هوازی حالت جامد قسمت آلی زباله جامد شهری برای تولید بیوگاز (مطالعه موردی در مشهد) | ||
| تحقیقات سامانهها و مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 21، شماره 76، دی 1399، صفحه 69-86 اصل مقاله (1.01 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/erams.2020.341540.1337 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محسن ثقوری* 1؛ رضا عبدی2؛ محمد علی ابراهیمی نیک3؛ عباس روحانی3؛ محمد علی میسمی4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه تبریز، دانشکده کشاورزی، گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، تبریز، ایران | ||
| 2عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه تبریز، دانشکده کشاورزی، گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، تبریز، ایران | ||
| 3عضو هیأت علمی گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران | ||
| 4عضو هیأت علمی گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، ، دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه تبریز | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هضم بیهوازی حالت جامد، علاوه بر تولید انرژی به عنوان راهکاری برای مدیریت زباله جامد شهری در نظر گرفته میشود. مزایای این روش شامل حجم کمتر مورد نیاز رآکتور، انرژی کمتر برای گرم کردن و جابجایی راحتتر مواد هضم شده میباشد. از آنجا که قسمت آلی زباله جامد شهری بسیار ناهمگن است، در نتیجه برای بررسی تولید بیوگاز از هر نوع زباله جامد شهری، مطالعات ویژه آن لازم است که هدف این تحقیق میباشد. در این پژوهش هضم بیهوازی حالت جامد قسمت آلی زباله جامد شهری به مدت 30 روز در مقیاس آزمایشگاهی با غلظت مواد جامد 20% برای ارزیابی میزان تولید بیوگاز در شرایط ناپیوسته و مزوفیلیک (بینابین) (37 درجه سلسیوس) انجام شد. با توجه به بالا بودن درصد مواد جامد کل بر اساس نتایج ارزیابی اولیه خصوصیات قسمت آلی زباله جامد شهری (درصد مواد جامد کل 63/30%)، هضم بیهوازی حالت جامد برای مدیریت این ضایعات مناسب است. به منظور بازسازی شرایط واقعی در مقیاس تجاری، هیچگونه مواد افزودنی به رآکتور اضافه نشد. عملکرد راکتور با اندازهگیری روزانه حجم بیوگاز تولیدی و محاسبه میزان تخریبپذیری مواد جامد فرار، مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. حجم بیوگاز تولیدی در انتهای فرآیند هضم، مقدار 372 میلیلیتر به ازای هر گرم مواد جامد فرار برای غلظت مواد جامد کل 20% با درصد متان 82/61% (معادل 230 میلیلیتر) به دست آمد. همچنین میزان تخریبپذیری مواد جامد فرار به عنوان یکی از پارامترهای بهرهوری آزمایشات حدود 7/64% محاسبه شد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| انرژیهای تجدیدپذیر؛ ضایعات آلی؛ متان؛ مدیریت پسماند؛ هضم بیهوازی ناپیوسته | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Solid State Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste for Biogas Production (Case Study in Mashhad) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| mohsen saghouri1؛ Reza Abdi2؛ Mohammadali Ebrahimi-Nik3؛ Abbas Rohani3؛ Mohammadali Maysami4 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Biosystem engineering, faculty of agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Biosystems Engineering, Agriculture Faculty, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| 4Department of Biosystems Engineering, Agriculture Faculty, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Increasing in consumption of fossil fuels and their price and environmental impacts, have led to a growing need and interest in replacement of these fuels with new and renewable energy sources. Anaerobic digestion is one of the attractive methods to produce biogas from organic matter.Wet state and solid state arethe categories of anaerobic digestion. Some benefits of solid-state anaerobic digestion (SS-AD) include the need for smaller reactor capacity requirements, less energy used for heating, and easier handling.In this study, SS-AD of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) was examined. The study was done in the laboratory scale of (1-liter volume), mesophiliccondition (37°C), and 20% solid content. Characterization of OFMSW indicated good potential of these materials to produce biogas through SS-AD (69.37% of total solids, 76.2% of volatile solids, and a C/N ratio of 38.28%). According to the results of SS-AD, a total of 372 ml biogas/g of volatile solids was obtained under normal laboratory conditions, of which 230 ml (61.82%) was methane. Also, a reduction of 64.7% was obtained for volatile solids, which is one of the parameters of the experiment productivity. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Batch Anaerobic Digestion, Methane, Organic Waste, Renewable Energies, Waste Management | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abudi, Z.N., Hu, Z., Sun, N., Xiao, B., Rajaa, N., Liu, C., & Guo, D. (2016). Batch anaerobic co-digestion ofOFMSW (organic fraction of municipal solid waste), TWAS (thickened waste activated sludge) and RS (rice straw): Influence of TWAS and RS pretreatment and mixing ratio. Energy, 107, 131-140.
Ahmadi-Pirlou, M., Ebrahimi-Nik, M., Khojastehpour, M., & Ebrahimi S. H. (2017). Mesophilic co-digestion of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge: Effect of mixing ratio, total solids, and alkaline pretreatment. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 125, 97-104.
Almassi M. (1976). Anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste with particular reference to energy recovery and pollution control (Ph. D. thesis), Agricultural Engineering. University of Reading.
Anon. (2005). Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. 21stEd. American Public Health Association. New York.
Anon. (2011). Composot, sampling and physical and chemical test methods. Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran. No. 13320. Iran National Standard. (in Persian)
Borowski, S., Domanski, J., & Weatherley, L. (2014). Anaerobic co-digestion of swine and poultry manure with municipal sewage sludge. Waste Management, 34, 513-521.
Brown, D., & Li, Y. (2013). Solid state anaerobic co-digestion of yard waste and food waste for biogas production. Bioresource Technology, 127, 275-280.
Capela, I., Rodrigues, A., Silva, F., Nadais, H., & Arroja, L. (2008). Impact of industrial sludge and cattle manure on anaerobic digestion of the OFMSW under mesophilic conditions. Biomass and Bioenergy, 32, 245-251.
Cuetos, M. J., Gomez, X., Otero, M., & Moran, A. (2008). Anaerobic digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste (SHW) at laboratory scale: Influence of co-digestion with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). Biochemical Engineering Journal, 40, 99-106.
Cui, Z., Shi, J., & Li, Y. (2011). Solid-state anaerobic digestion of spent wheat straw from horse stall. Bioresource Technology, 102, 9432-9437.
Dai, X., Duan, N., Dong, B., & Dai, L. (2013). High-solids anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste in comparison with mono digestions: Stability and performance. Waste Management, 33, 308-316.
Derbal, K., Bencheikh-Lehocine, M., & Meniai, A. H. (2012). Study of biodegradability of organic fraction of municipal solids waste. Energy Procedia, 19, 239-248.
Fdez-Güelfo, L. A., Álvarez-Gallego, C., Márquez, D. S., & García, L. I. R. (2011). Biological pretreatment applied to industrial organic fraction of municipal solid wastes (OFMSW): Effect on anaerobic digestion. Chemical Engineering Journal, 172, 321-325.
Fernandez, J., Perez, M., & Romero, L. I. (2008). Effect of substrate concentration on dry mesophilic anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). Bioresource Technology, 99, 6075-6080.
Forster-Carneiro, T., Perez, M., Romero, L. I., & Sales, D. (2007). Dry-thermophilic anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of the municipal solid waste: Focusing on the inoculum sources. Bioresource Technology, 98, 3195-3203.
Garcia, A. J., Esteban, M. B., Marquez, M. C., & Ramos, P. (2005). Biodegradable municipal solid waste: Characterization and potential use as animal feedstuffs.Waste Management, 25, 780-787.
Ghanimeh, S., El Fadel, M., & Saikaly, P. (2012). Mixing effect on thermophilic anaerobic digestion of source-sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste.Bioresource Technology, 117, 63-71.
Guarino, G., Carotenuto, C., Cristofaro, F. D., Papa, S., Morrone, B., & Minale, M. (2016). Does the C/N ratio really affect the Bio-methane Yield? A three years investigation of Buffalo Manure Digestion. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 49, 463-468.
Hazinia, R. (2011). Comparison and evaluation of biogas quantity and quality which obtain from cattle, poultry and plant wastes on the laboratory conditions (M. Sc. Thesis), Agricultural Mechanization Engineering. Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch. (in Persian)
Huang, X., Yun, S., Zhu, J., Du, T., Zhang, C., & Li, X. (2016). Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of aloe peel waste with dairy manure in the batch digester: Focusing on mixing ratios and digestate stability. Bioresource Technology, 218, 62-68.
Kaluza, L., Šuštaršic, M., Rutar, V., & Zupancic, G. D. (2014). The re-use of Waste-Activated Sludge as part of a ‘‘zero-sludge’’ strategy for wastewater treatments in the pulp and paper industry. Bioresource Technology, 151, 137-143.
Li, C., Champagne, P., & Anderson, B. C. (2011). Evaluating and modeling biogas production from municipal fat, oil, and grease and synthetic kitchen waste in anaerobic co-digestions. Bioresource Technology, 102, 9471-9480.
Li, Y., Zhang, R., Chen, C., Liu, G., He, Y., & Liu, X. (2013). Biogas production from co-digestion of corn stover and chicken manure under anaerobic wet, hemi-solid, and solid state conditions. Bioresource Technology, 149, 406-412.
Liu, G., Zhang, R., El-Mashad, H. M., Dong, R. (2009). Effect of feed to inoculum ratios on biogas yields of food and green wastes. Bioresource Technology, 100, 5103-5108.
Marousi, M., & Leyli, M. (2009). The microbiology of anaerobic digesters. First Ed. Shahrab Pub. Tehran. (in Persian)
Martín-González, L., Colturato, L. F., Font, X., & Vicent, T. (2010). Anaerobic co-digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste with FOG waste from a sewage treatment plant: Recovering a wasted methane potential and enhancing the biogas yield. Waste Management, 30, 1854-1859.
Murto, M., Bjornsson, L., & Mattiasson, B. (2004). Impact of food industrial waste on anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and pig manure. Journal of Environmental Management, 70, 101-107.
Nielfa, A., Cano, R., & Fdz-Polanco, M. (2015). Theoretical methane production generated by the co-digestion of organic fraction municipal solid waste and biological sludge. Biotechnology Reports, 5, 14-21.
Novarino, D., & Zanetti, M. C. (2012). Anaerobic digestion of extruded OFMSW. Bioresource Technology, 104, 44-50.
Ponsa, S., Gea, T., & Sanchez, A. (2011). Anaerobic co-digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste with several pure organic co-substrates. Biosystems Engineering, 108, 352-360.
Rodríguez, J. F., Pérez, M., & Romero, L. I. (2012). Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Optimisation of the semicontinuous process. Chemical Engineering Journal, 193-194, 10-15.
Rodríguez-Abalde, A., Flotats, X., & Fernández, B. (2017). Optimization of the anaerobic co-digestion of pasteurized slaughterhouse waste, pig slurry and glycerine. Waste Management, 61, 521-528.
Weiland, P. (2010). Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnolology, 85, 849-860.
Zhang, C., Xiao, G., Peng, L., Su, H., & Tan, T. (2013). The anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and cattle manure. Bioresource Technology, 129, 170-176.
Zhang, W., Wei, Q., Wu, S., Qi, D., Li, W., Zuo, Z., & Dong, R. (2014). Batch anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with dewatered sewage sludge under mesophilic conditions. Applied Energy, 128, 175-183. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,076 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 492 |
||