اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات284
تعداد نشریات سازمان82
تعداد شماره‌ها3,037
تعداد مقالات33,984
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,771,078
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله77,190,709
عالیشاه, عمران. (1396). تنوع ژنوتیپی و اجزای همبسته با عملکرد، کیفیت الیاف و هتروزیس در برخی هیبریدهای پنبه. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 5(1), 49-74. doi: 10.22092/ijcr.2017.115570
عمران عالیشاه. "تنوع ژنوتیپی و اجزای همبسته با عملکرد، کیفیت الیاف و هتروزیس در برخی هیبریدهای پنبه". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 5, 1, 1396, 49-74. doi: 10.22092/ijcr.2017.115570
عالیشاه, عمران. (1396). 'تنوع ژنوتیپی و اجزای همبسته با عملکرد، کیفیت الیاف و هتروزیس در برخی هیبریدهای پنبه', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 5(1), pp. 49-74. doi: 10.22092/ijcr.2017.115570
عالیشاه, عمران. تنوع ژنوتیپی و اجزای همبسته با عملکرد، کیفیت الیاف و هتروزیس در برخی هیبریدهای پنبه. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1396; 5(1): 49-74. doi: 10.22092/ijcr.2017.115570

تنوع ژنوتیپی و اجزای همبسته با عملکرد، کیفیت الیاف و هتروزیس در برخی هیبریدهای پنبه

پژوهش های پنبه ایران
مقاله 1، دوره 5، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 9، شهریور 1396، صفحه 49-74    اصل مقاله (359.85 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijcr.2017.115570
نویسنده
عمران عالیشاه*
دانشیار و عضو هیات‌علمی مؤسسه تحقیقات پنبه کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گرگان، ایران
چکیده
بهبود عملکرد یکی از اهداف مهم به‌نژادی پنبه محسوب می‌شود و بهره‌گیری از هتروزیس به‌عنوان یکی از ابزارهای قدرتمند جهت ارتقای عملکرد و کیفیت الیاف پنبه همیشه مورد توجه به‌نژادگران پنبه بوده است. به منظور بررسی خصوصیات والدینی و میزان هتروزیس مفید قابل دستیابی در هیبریدهای پنبه، تلاقی‌های متعددی در سال‌های 1389 و 1391 انجام و بر اساس ارزیابی‌های مقدماتی تعداد ده هیبرید انتخاب و در سال 1393 در کنار ده ژنوتیپ والدینی و تجاری در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار ارزیابی شدند و داده‌های آزمایشی با استفاده از روشهای آماری و بیومتریک مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند. نتایج تجزیه واریانس صفات دلالت بر تنوع ژنوتیپی و اختلاف معنی‌دار بین هیبریدها و والدین مورد مطالعه برای اکثر صفات کمی و کیفی داشت. در بین هیبریدهای مورد بررسی، Mehr× BeliIzovar و T2×Bakhtegan به‌ترتیب با عملکرد 4993 و 4876 کیلوگرم در هکتار در رتبه‌های اول و دوم قرار گرفتند و میزان هتروزیس عملکرد آنها نسبت به والد برتر مثبت و به ترتیب 7/24 و 8/22 درصد بود. بر اساس عملکرد و شاخص‌های کیفیت الیاف، هیبریدهای Sahel× Khordad و Sahel× B557 در رتبه‌های بالاتر قرار گرفتند. رقم‌های والدینی ساحل، ورامین، گلستان و خرداد به ترتیب مناسب‌ترین والدین برای بهبود کیفیت الیاف، وزن غوزه و تعداد غوزه بودند. میزان هتروزیس عملکرد هیبریدها ارتباطی با پتانسیل والدین نشان نداد، ولی با میزان اختلاف والدین و ترکیب‌پذیری خصوصی (SCA) همبستگی نسبتاً قوی داشت و در بین ژنوتیپ‌های والدینی، بیشترین هتروزیس مربوط به تلاقی‌ ژنوتیپ‌های داخلی و خارجی بود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
پنبه؛ همبستگی؛ ترکیب پذیری؛ شاخص کیفیت الیاف
عنوان مقاله [English]
Genotypic variation and correlated components of yield, fiber quality and heterosis in some cotton hybrids
نویسندگان [English]
Omran Alishah
Associate Prof., Cotton Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Gorgan, Iran
چکیده [English]
Yield and fiber quality are the main objectives of cotton breeding programme. Developing of cotton hybrid and using of heterosis was considered as a powerful tool for cotton yield and fiber quality improvement of. The objective of this study was assessment of some new cotton hybrids in northern of Iran. For this purpose, ten cotton hybrids as well as ten parental lines (Gossypium hirsutum L.) were grown at HashemAbad Cotton Research station, Gorgan- Iran. The genotypes were arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications in 2014. Data were recorded on plant height, boll weight, seed cotton yield plot-1, earliness and fiber charactristics. The results indicate significant variation among the genotypes for most of the parameters. Midparent heterosis for yield ranged 0.7-33.1 percent over different hybrids. The Mehr × BeliIzovar and T2 × Bakhtegan hybrids performed well by having maximum heterosis (28.5 and 33.1 %), seedcotton yield (4993 and 4876, respectively), good maturity, but lower fiber quality indices. The Sahel× Khordad and Sahel× B557 hybrids showed appreciable genetic potential for relatively yield production and fiber quality indices. Sahel, Varamin, Khordad and Golestan were the most suitable parents for improving the fiber quality, boll weight and boll number, respectively. The heterosis of the hybrids did not show significant correlation with the parental yield potential, but with significant correlation with parental distance and specific combining ability (SCA). The highest heterosis was observed in endemic × exotic genotype crosses.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Cotton, Correlation, combining ability, Fiber quality index
مراجع
  1. Alake, C.O., Ojo, D.K., Oduwaye, O.A., and Adekoya, M.A. 2008. Genetic variability and correlation studies in yield and yield related characters of tropical maize (Zea mays L.). Asset Series A, 8(1), 14-27.
  2. Alishah O., Ramzanimoghaddam, M.R. and Hekmat, M.H. 2014 Commercial Hybrid Seed production in Cotton. Final Report of Research Project. Agricultural Research, Education and Extenssion Organization Cotton Research Institute, registered No. 45452/ 2014. (in Persian)
  3. Alishah, O. 2013. Cotton breeding and Genetics. Nashre Daneshgahi Pub. Pp. 195. (in Persian)
  4. Alishah, O., Fahmideh, L. and Nasrollahnejad, S. 2009. Genetic analysis of yield and some correlated traits in upland cotton genotypes. Plant Production Researches Journal. 16(2): 67-85. (in Persian with English Abstract)
  5. Alishah, O., Bagherieh Najjar, M.B. and Fahmideh, L. 2008. Correlation, Path coefficient and Factor analysis of some quantitative and qualitative traits in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L). Asian Journal of Biological Sciences. 1(2): 61-68
  6. Al-Jibouri, H.A., Miller, P.A., and Robinson, H.F. 1958. Genotypic and environmental variances and covariances in an upland cotton cross of interspecific origin. Agron J. 50: 633-636.
  7. Al-Rawi, K.M., and Kohel, R.J. 1969. Diallel analaysis of yield and other gronomic characters in Gossypium hirsutum L. Crop Sci. 6: 779-783.
  8. Anandan A. 2010. Environmental Impact on the Combining Ability of Fiber Traits and Seed-Cotton Yield in Cotton. Journal of Crop Improvement, 24:310–323.
  9. Anandan, A., Koodalingam, K., and Raveendran, T.S. 2004. Heterosis in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) based on cytoplasmic genic male sterility (CMS) system. Int. J. Trop Agric. 22:43–47.
  10. Anjum R., Somro, A.R., and Chang, M.A. 2001. Node Above with Flower (NAWF): an indicatot of earliness in cotton. Pakistan Jour. of  Biol. Sci. 4(4): 458-459.
  11. Baloch, M.J., Lakho, A.R. and Soomro, A.H. 1993. Heterosis in interspecific cotton hybrids. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 25, 13–20.
  12. Basbag S., and Gencer, O. 2007 Investigation of some yield and fibre quality characteristics of interspecific hybrid (Gossypium hirsutum L. * G. barbadense L.) cotton varieties. Hereditas, 144(1):33–42.
  13. Basbag S., and Gencer, O. 2000. Investigation on the inheritance of earliness characters in cotton (G. hirsutum L.). Proc. The Inter-Regional Co-operative Research Network on Cotton for the Mediterranean and Middle East Region, Sept. 2000, p. 51-54.
  14. Blum A. 2013 Heterosis, stress, and the environment: a possible road map towards the general improvement of crop yield. Jour. of  Exp. Bot. 64(16): 4829–4837
  15. Bocanski, J., Sreckov, Z., and Nastasic, A. 2009. Genetic and phenotypic relationship between grain yield and components of grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Genetika, 41(2), 145-154. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2298/ GENSR0902145B
  16. Bowman, D.T., Bourland, F.M., Myers, G.O., Wallace, T.P., and Caldwell, D. 2004. Visual selection for yield in cotton breeding programs. Jour. of Cotton Sci. 8: 52-68.
  17. Cai, Q. S., Wang, L.L., Yao, W.H., Zhang, Y.D., Liu, L., Yu, L.J. and Fan, X.M. 2012. Diallel analysis of photosynthetic traits in maize. Crop Sci. 52:551–559.
  18. Chaudhry, M.R. 2008.  Date on Costs of Producing Cotton in the World. The ICAC Recorder. 2008
  19. Choudhary, O.P, Josan, A.S. and Bajwa, M.S. 2001. Yield and fibre quality of cotton cultivars as affected by the build-up of sodium in the soils with sustained sodic irrigation under semi-arid conditions. Agricultural water management. 49:1-9.
  20. Clement J.D., Constable, G.A. Stiller, W.N., and Liu, S.M. 2015. Early generation selection strategies for breeding better combinationsof cotton yield and fibre quality. Field Crops Research, 172 (2015) 145–152.
  21. Clement, J.D., Constable, G.A., Stiller, W.N., and Liu, S.M. 2012. Negative associations still exist between yield and fibre quality in cotton breeding programs in Australia and USA. Field Crops Research, 128 (2012) 1–7.
  22. Costa J.N., Freire, E.C., Costa, M.N., Santor, J.W. and Macededo Vieira, R. 1998. Heterosis and general and specific combining ability in cotton Gossypium hirsutum L. Revista de oleaginosas e Fibrosas, 2: 151–156.
  23. Coyle G.G., and Smith C.W. 1997 Combining ability for within-boll yield components in cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Crop Sci, 37: 1118–1122.
  24. Culp, T.W., Harrell, D.C., and Kert, T. 1979. Some genetic implications in the transfer of high fiber strength genes to upland cotton. Crop Sci. 19: 11-34.
  25. Davis D.D. 1978 Hybrid cotton: specific problems and potentials. Adv. Agron. 30:129–157
  26. Davis, D.D., and Palomo, A. 1980. Yield stability of            interspecific hybrids NX-1._Proc. Belt. Cotton Prod. Res. Conf. National Council Am., 81. Memphis, USA.
  27. Dehghanpour Z. and Ehdaie, B. 2013. Stability of General and Specific Combining Ability Effects for Grain Yield in Elite Iranian Maize Inbred Lines. Journal of Crop Improvement, 27:137–152, 2013. (in Persian with English Abstract)
  28. Dong, H.Z., Li, W.J., and Li, Z.H. et al. 2003. Yield and efficiency in hybrid seed production in cotton affected by ecological conditions. Cotton Sci. 15: 328-332.
  29. Dong, H. Z., Li, W.J., and Tang, W. et al. 2004. Development of hybrid Bt cotton in China-a successful integration of transgenic technology and conventional techniques.  Curr. Sci. 86: 778-782.
  30. Dong, H.Z., Li, W.J., Tang, W., Li, Z.H. and Zhang, D.M. 2007. Heterosis in yield, endotoxin expression and some physiological parameters in Bt transgenic cotton. Plant Breeding, 126: 169–175.
  31. Dong, J., Wu, F.B., Jin, Z., and Huang, Y. 2006. Heterosis for yield and some physiological traits in hybrid cotton Cikangza 1. Euphytica 151, 71–77.
  32. Dutt, Y., Wang, X.D., Zhu, Y.G., and Li, Y.Y. 2004. Breeding for high yield and fibre quality in coloured cotton. Plant Breeding 123, 145–151.
  33. Feng H.J., Sun, J.L., Wang, J., Jia, Y.H., Zhang, X.Y., Pang, B.Y., Sun, J. and Ming Du, X. 2011. Genetic effects and heterosis of the fibre colour and quality of brown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Plant Breeding 130, 450-456.
  34. Fu D. Xiao, M., Hayward A., Fu Y., Liu G., Jiang G., Zhang, H. 2014. Utilization of crop heterosis: a review. Euphytica, 197: 161–173.
  35. Gartner, T., Steinfath, M., Andorf, S., Lisec, J., Meyer, R.C., Altmann, T., Willmitzer, L., and Selbig, J. 2009. Improved heterosis prediction by combining information on DNA- and metabolic markers. Plos one 4(4): e 5220. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0005220.
  36. Geddam, S.B., Khadi, B.M., Mogali, S., Patil, R.S., Katageri, I.S., Nadaf, H.L. and Patil, B.C. 2011. Study of heterosis in genetic male sterility based diploid cotton hybrids for yield, yield components and fibre quality characters. Karnataka Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 24, 118–124.
  37. Godoy AS, and Palomo G.A. 1999. Genetic analysis of earliness in upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.). II. Yield and lint percentage. Euphytica, 105:161–166
  38. Hao, J.J., Yu, S.X., Dong, Z.D., Fan, S.L., Ma, Q.X., Song, M.Z. and Yu, J.W. 2008. Quantitative inheritance of leaf morphological traits in upland cotton. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 146, 561–569.
  39. Hoskinson, P.E., and Stewart J Mc.D. 1977. Field performance of two obsolete cotton cultivars. In: Proceedings of Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conference, Atlanta, GA, National Cotton Council of America, Memphis, TN, pp: 78–79.
  40. Huang, M., Chen, L.Y., and Chen, Z.Q. 2015. Diallel analysis of combining ability and heterosis for yield and yield components in rice by using positive loci. Euphytica,  205: 37–50.
  41. Hughs S.E. 2002. Ginning rib modifications to reduce seedcoat fragments. Appl. Eng. Agric, 18:13–16
  42. Hughs, S.E. and Lalor, W.F. 1986. The effect of cotton variety, genotype, and cleaning levels on cloth imperfections: a progress report. In: Brown, J.M. (ed.), Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf. Natl Cotton Council Am., Memphis, TN, p. 26-36.
  43. ICAC, 2015. Prices of Biotech planting seed and technology fees for biotech traits. The ICAC Recorder, Vol. 3. No.3. Sep. 2015.
  44. Iqbal, M., Iqbal, M.Z., and Chang, M.A. 2003. Yield and fiber quality potential for second generation cotton hybrids.Pakistan J. of Biol. Sci. 6: 1883_1887.
  45. Kalloo G, Rai M, Singh M, Kumar S. 2006. Heterosis in crop plants. Researchco Book Centre, New Delhi
  46. Kantartzi, S.K. and Roupakias, D.G. 2010. Study of apomictic seed formation in interspecific, Gossypium barbadense × G. hirsutum, cotton hybrids. International Journal of Botany, 6: 164–169.
  47. Khadi, B.M., Rao, P., Yenjerappa, S.T., Janagoudar, B.S., and P. Rao. 1996. Combining ability studies and identification of superior inter specific desi cotton hybrids. Mysore Jour. Agric Sci. 30:1–9.
  48. Khan M.A., Iqbal, M., and Jamil, M. 2010. Finding heterosis for fiber traits in intervarietal crosses of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Front. Agric. China 2010, 4(2): 185–187.
  49. Khan N.U., Hassan, G., Kumbhar, M.B., Marwatb, K.B., Khan, M.A. Parveen, A., Aimand, U., and  Saeed, M. 2009. Combining ability analysis to identify suitable parents for heterosis in seed cotton yield, its components and lint percent in upland cotton. Industrial crops and products, 29: 108–115
  50. Koti, S., Reddy, K.R., Reddy, V.R., Kakani, V.G., and Zhao, D. 2005 Interactive effects of carbon dioxide, temperature, and ultraviolet - B radiation on soybean (Glycine max L.) flower and pollen morphology, pollen production, germination, and tube lengths. J. Exp. Bot. 56:725–736. doi:10.1093/jxb/eri044
  51. Kowsalya, R., and Raveendran, T.S. 1996. Heterosis in intra specific Gossypium hybrids possessing harknessii and hirsutum plasmons. Annals Plant Physiol. 10:114–117.
  52. Liang Q., Shang, L., Wang, Y., and Hua, J. 2015. Partial Dominance, Overdominance and Epistasis as the Genetic Basis of Heterosis in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). PLoS ONE, 10(11): 1-21.
  53. Luckett D.J. 1989. Diallel analysis of yield components, fibre quality and bacterial blight resistance using spacing plants of cotton. Euphytica, 44: 11–21.
  54. Masood J., Ghulam H., Iftikhar, K. Raziuddin 2005. Estimates of heterosis and heterobeltiosis for morphological traits in wheat (Triticum aestivun L.). Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 8(9): 1261–1264
  55. Melchinger A.E., and Gumber, R.K. 1998 Overview of heterosis and heterotic crops in agronomic crops. In: Lamkey K.L., Staub JE (eds) Concepts and breeding of heterotic crop plants. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, pp 29–44
  56. Meredith W.R., and Brown J.S. 1998. Heterosis and combining ability of cottons originating from different regions of the United States. J. Cotton Sci. 2:77–84.
  57. Meredith W.R. 1984. Quantitative genetics. In: Kohel RJ and Lewis CF (eds) Cotton, Agron Monog no. 24, ASA-CSSASSSA, Madison, WI, p: 131–150
  58. Miller, P.A., and Marani, A. 1963. Heterosis and combining ability in diallel crosses of upland cotton, G. hirsutum L. Crop Sci. 3: 646_649.
  59. Munaro E.M., Eyhe´rabide, G.H., D’Andrea K.E., Cirilo, A.G., and Otegui, M.E. 2011. Heterosis and environment interaction in maize: what drives heterosis for grain yield? Field Crops Res. 124(3): 441–449.
  60. Nadarajan, N., and Sree Rangasamy, S.R. 1991. Genetic analysis of some economic characters in Gossypium hirsutum L. J. Indian Soc Cott Improv. 16:15–18.
  61. Ndhlela, T., Herselman, L., Semagn, K., Magorokosho, C., Mutimaamba, C., and Labuschagne, M.T. 2015. Relationships between heterosis, genetic distances and specific combining ability among CIMMYT and Zimbabwe developed maize inbred lines under stress and optimal conditions. Euphytica 204:635–647
  62. Qian, W., Li, Q., Noack, J., Sass, O., Meng, J., Frauen, M., and Jung, C. 2009. Heterotic patterns in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): II. Crosses between European winter and Chinese semiwinter lines. Plant Breeding, 128:466–470.
  63. Ramkumar Seshadri, S., Arvind Purushothaman, Kater D. Hake and David, D. McAlister 2007. Relationship Between Cotton Varieties and Moisture Vapor Transport of Knitted Fabrics. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics http://www.jeffjournal.org, 2(4):10-18.
  64. Reddy, V.R., Jabeen, F., Sudarshan, M.R., and Rao, A.S. 2012. Studies on genetic variability, heritability, correlation and path analysis in maize (Zea mays L.) Over locations. International Journal of Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology. 4(1), 196-199. Retrieved from http://www.ijabpt.com
  65. SAS Institute (2004) SAS/STAT. User’s guide. Version 9.1. SAS Inst, Cary, NC.    
  66. Shang, L., Wang, Y., Cai, S., Ma L., Liu, F., Chen, Z., Su, Y., Wang, K., and Hua, J. 2016. Genetic analysis of Upland cotton dynamic heterosis for boll number per plant at multiple developmental stages. Scientific Reports, 1-9, DOI: 10.1038/srep35515
  67. Shang, L.G. et al. 2016. Seedling root QTLs analysis on dynamic development and upon nitrogen deficiency stress in Upland cotton. Euphytica 207, 645–663.
  68. Siddiqui, M.A., and Patil, R.A. 1994. Heterosis in crosses of Gossypium hirsutum cotton. J. Maharashtra Agric Univ. 19: 241–244.
  69. Singh P. and Singh, S. 1999. Heterosis breeding in cotton. Kalyani Publishers.India, 107pp
  70. Singh, P. 2003. Cotton  breeding. Kalyani  Pub. New  Dehli. India. pp.74-92.
  71. Solomon K.F., Zeppa, A. and Mulugeta, S.D. 2011. Combining ability, genetic diversity and heterosis in relation to F1 performance of tropically adapted shrunken (sh2) sweet corn lines. Plant Breeding. doi:10.1111/j.1439 0523. 2012. 01965 x.
  72. Solomon K.F., Zeppa, A., and Mulugeta, S.D. 2012 Combining ability, genetic diversity and heterosis in relation to F1 performance of tropically adapted shrunken (sh2) sweet corn lines. Plant Breeding,131: 430–436
  73. Song G., Chen Q., and Tang C. 2014. The effects of high-temperature stress on the germination of pollen grains of upland cotton during square development. Euphytica, 200:175–186. doi:10. 1007/s10681-014-1141-1
  74. Song G., Wang, M., Zeng, B., Zhang, J., Jiang, C., Hu, Q., Geng, G., and Tang, C. 2015. Anther response to high-temperature stress during development and pollen thermotolerance heterosis as revealed by pollen tube growth and in vitro pollen vigor analysis in upland cotton. Planta, 12 Feb. 2015. DOI 10.1007/s00425-015-2259-7
  75. Song M., Fan, S., Pang, C., Wei, H., Liu, J., and Yu, S. 2015. Genetic analysis of yield and yield-related traits in short-season cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Euphytica, DOI 10.1007/s10681-014-1348-1
  76. Souza J.A., and Maluf, W.R. 2003. Diallel analyses and estimation of genetic parameters of hot pepper (Capsicum chinense Jacq). Scientia Agricola, 60:105–113
  77. SPSS Inc. 2001. SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions) 11.0 for windows http://www.spss.com/spss
  78. Srivastava, H.K. 2000. Nuclear control and mitochondrial transcript processing with relevance to cytoplasmic male sterility in higher plants. Current Science 79, 176–186.
  79. Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H., and Deekey, D.A. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 3rd ed. McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc. New York.
  80. Stelly D.M., Stewart, J.M., Thaxton, P., Ulloa, M., Weaver Hurd,  D.B. and Kuznetsov, A. 2005. Fast computations in the affine Markov chain model. Hurd, T. R. and Kuznetsov, A. 2006. Affine Markov chain model of multifirm credit Migration, Journal of Credit Risk, 3(1), 3–29.
  81. Sujiprihati, S., Saleh, G.B., and Ali, E.S. 2003. Heritability, performance and correlation studies on single cross hybrids of tropical maize. Asian Journal of Plant Science, 2(1), 51-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2003.51.57
  82. Tang, B., Jenkins, J.N., Watson, C.E., McCarty, J.C., and Creech, R.G. 1996. Evaluation of Genetic variances, heritabilities, and correlations for yield and fiber traits among cotton F2 hybrid populations. Euphytica 91:315–322
  83. Tian H.Y., Channa, S.A. and Hu, S.W. 2017. Relationships between genetic distance, combining ability and heterosis in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Euphytica, 213:1.
  84. Tokatlidis, I.S., Tsikrikoni, C., Tsialtas, J.T., Lithourgidis, A.S. and Bebeli, P.J. 2008. Variability within cotton cultivars for yield, fibre quality and physiological traits. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 146, 483–490.
  85. Tyagi, A.P. 1987. Correlation studies on yield and fiber traits in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 280–283.
  86. USDA. 2015. Cotton and Cottonseed Farming. United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service.
  87. USDA. 2016. Cotton Varieties Planted in United State 2016. USDA  Marketing Service pub. 2016.
  88. Vashistha, A., Dixit, N.N., Dipika, Sharma, S.K., and Marker, S. 2013. Studies on heritability and genetic advance estimates in Maize genotypes. Bioscience Discovery, 4(2), 165-168. Retrieved from http://biosciencediscovery.com 165 ISSN: 2231-024X
  89. Wallace T.P., Bowman, D., Campbell, B.T., Chee, P., Gutierrez, O.A., Kohel, R.J., McCarty, J., Myers, G., Percy, R., Robinson, F., and Smith, W. 2008. Status of the USA cotton germplasm collection and crop vulnerability.  Genet Resour Crop Evol. 1-26.
  90. Wang, X.D., Dutt, Y.Y., Ni, X.Y., Zhao, X.Q. and Nirania, K.S. 2004. Breeding for semi-okra leaf hybrids in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) (Abstract). In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Strategies for Sustainable Cotton Production: A Global Vision, held at UAS, Dharwad (Karnataka) from November 21–23
  91. Wei, X.C., Li, Q.Z., and Pang, J.Q. et al. 2002. Heterosis of preforest lint yield of hybrid between varieties or lines within upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J. Cotton Sci. 14: 269-272.
  92. Wu, J., Mccarty, J.C. Jenkins, J.N., and Meredith, W.R. 2010. Breeding potential of introgressions into upland cotton: genetic effects and heterosis. Plant Breeding 129, 526-532.
  93. Wu, Y.T., Yin, J. M., Guo, W.Z., Zhu, X.F., and Zhang, T.Z. 2004. Heterosis performance of yield and fibre quality in F1 and F2 hybrids in upland cotton. Plant Breeding 123, 285–289.
  94. Yuan S.N., Malik, W., Bibi, N., Wen, G.J., NI, M., and Wang, X.D. 2013. Modulation of morphological and biochemical traits using heterosis breeding in coloured cotton.  Journal of Agricultural Science. 151: 57–71.
  95. Yuan, S.N., Hua, S. J., Ni, M., Li, Y.Y., Wen, G. J., Shao, M.Y., Zhang, H. P., Zhu, S.J. and Wang, X. D. 2010. The relationship between fiber macroelement content and fiber quality in colored cotton. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 43, 4169–4175.
  96. Yuan, Y.L., Zhang, T.Z., Guo, W.Z. et al. 2002. Heterosis and gene action of boll weight and lint percentage in high quality fibre property varieties in upland cotton. Acta Res. Sin. 28: 196_202.
  97. Yuan, Y.L., Zhang, T.Z., and Guo, W.Z. et al. 2002. Heterosis and gene action of boll weight and lint percentage in high quality fibre property varieties in upland cotton. Acta Res. Sin. 28: 196-202.
  98. Zeeshan, M., Ahsan, M., Arshad, W., Ali, S., Hussain, M., and Khan, M.I. 2013. Estimate of correlated responses for some polygenic parameters in yellow maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. International Journal of Advanced Research, 1(5), 24-29. Retrieved from http://www.journalijar.com
  99. Zeng L., and Meredith W.R. 2009a. Associations among lint yield, yield components, and fiber properties in an introgressed population of cotton. Crop Sci. 49:1647–1654
  100. Zeng, L.H,, Meredith, W.R. 2011. Relationship between SSR based genetic distance and cotton F2 hybrid performance for lint yield and fiber properties. Crop Sci. 51: 2362–2370.
  101. Zhang J.F. Abdelraheem, A., and Wu, J.X. 2017. Heterosis, combining ability and genetic effect, and relationship with genetic distance based on a diallel of hybrids from five diverse Gossypium barbadense cotton genotypes. Euphytica (2017) 213:208
  102. Zhang J., M. Wu, J. Yu, X.L., W. 2016. Breeding Potential of Introgression Lines Developed from Interspecific Crossing between Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and Gossypium barbadense: Heterosis, Combining Ability and Genetic effects. PLoS ONE, 11(1):1-17.
  103. Zhang, X. Q., Wang, X.D., Jiang, P.D., Hua, S.J., Zhang, H.P., and Dutt, Y. 2007. Relationship between molecular marker heterozygosity and hybrid performance in intra- and interspecific hybrids of cotton. Plant Breeding, 126: 385–391.
  104. Zhang, W.J., Shu, H.M., Hu, H.B., Cheng, B.L., Wang, Y.H., and Zhou, Z.G. 2009. Genotypic differences in some physiological characteristics during the cotton fibre thickening and its influence on fibre strength. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 31: 927–935.
  105. Zhou, G., Chen, Y., Yao, W., Zhang, C., Xie, W., Hua, J., Xing, Y., Xiao, J., and Zhang, Q. 2012. Genetic composition of yield heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA ,109(39): 15847–15852
  106. Zhu, X.X., Ainijiang Zhang, Y.M., Guo, W.Z., and Zhang, T.Z. 2011. Relationships between differential gene expression and heterosis in cotton hybrids developed from the foundation parent CRI-12 and its pedigree-derived lines. Plant Sci. 180: 221–227.
  107. Zhu, W., Liu, K., and Wang, X.D. 2008. Heterosis in yield, fiber quality, and photosynthesis of okra leaf oriented hybrid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Euphytica,164: 283–291.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 254
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 256


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب