اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات282
تعداد نشریات سازمان80
تعداد شماره‌ها3,188
تعداد مقالات35,336
تعداد مشاهده مقاله51,458,206
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله91,331,907
وفایی, مصیب, گلچین, احمد, شفیعی, سعید. (1398). تأثیر گچ، کربن آلی و مدت زمان خوابانیدن بر برخی ویژگی‌های یک خاک سدیمی. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 33(1), 101-113. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2019.119059
مصیب وفایی; احمد گلچین; سعید شفیعی. "تأثیر گچ، کربن آلی و مدت زمان خوابانیدن بر برخی ویژگی‌های یک خاک سدیمی". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 33, 1, 1398, 101-113. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2019.119059
وفایی, مصیب, گلچین, احمد, شفیعی, سعید. (1398). 'تأثیر گچ، کربن آلی و مدت زمان خوابانیدن بر برخی ویژگی‌های یک خاک سدیمی', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 33(1), pp. 101-113. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2019.119059
وفایی, مصیب, گلچین, احمد, شفیعی, سعید. تأثیر گچ، کربن آلی و مدت زمان خوابانیدن بر برخی ویژگی‌های یک خاک سدیمی. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1398; 33(1): 101-113. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2019.119059

تأثیر گچ، کربن آلی و مدت زمان خوابانیدن بر برخی ویژگی‌های یک خاک سدیمی

پژوهش های خاک
مقاله 10، دوره 33، شماره 1، خرداد 1398، صفحه 101-113    اصل مقاله (2.36 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijsr.2019.119059
نویسندگان
مصیب وفایی1؛ احمد گلچین2؛ سعید شفیعی* 3
1کارشناسی ارشد گروه علوم خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان
2استاد گروه علوم خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه زنجان
3استادیار گروه علوم خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه جیرفت
چکیده
خاک­های سدیمی به طور وسیعی در مناطق خشک و نیمه خشک گسترش یافته­اند. برای اینکه اراضی سدیمی بتوانند مورد استفاده کشاورزی قرار بگیرند باید ویژگی­های فیزیکی و شیمیایی نامطلوب آن‌ها اصلاح گردد. به منظور بررسی اثر گچ (صفر، 50 و 100 درصد نیاز گچی) به تنهایی و توأم با کاربرد مواد آلی از منابع مختلف (بدون بقایا، بقایای گیاه یونجه، ضایعات میوه خرما، بقایای گیاه ذرت و خاک اره) به میزان 5/1 و 3 درصد کربن آلی بر ویژگی­های یک خاک سدیمی، یک آزمایش فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با 27 تیمار و 3 تکرار به اجرا درآمد. پس از اعمال تیمارها، هر 15روز یکبار به مدت دو ماه درصد سدیم تبادلی، نسبت جذب سدیم، pH، رس قابل انتشار اندازه­گیری شد.سپس در پایان زمان خوابانیدن، خاک مورد آبشویی گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که با افزایش زمان خوابانیدن ویژگی­های شیمیایی خاک بهبود یافت. قبل از آبشویی تیمار گچ به میزان 100 درصد نیاز گچی و بدون کربن آلی مصرفی دارای بیشترین تأثیر در کاهش نسبت جذب سدیم، درصد سدیم تبادلی و رس قابل انتشار بود. بیشترین مقدار تنفس میکروبی نیز از مصرف 3 درصد کربن آلی از منبع ضایعات میوه خرما بدون گچ مصرفی حاصل شد. مواد آلی قبل از آبشویی باعت ایجاد ویژگی­های شیمیایی نامناسباز قبیل افزایش درصد سدیم تبادلی، نسبت جذب سدیم، و رس قابل انتشار در خاک سدیمی شد. پس از آبشویی، در همه تیمارها، pH، نسبت جذب سدیم، درصد سدیم تبادلی و رس قابل انتشار و هدایت هیدرولیکی کاهش یافت.تیمار3 درصد کربن آلی از منبع ضایعات میوه خرما به همراه گچ به مقدار 100 درصد نیازگچی مؤثرترین تیمار برای اصلاح خاک سدیمی مورد مطالعه در این پژوهش بود. مواد آلی و گچ زمانی بیشترین تأثیر را در اصلاح خاک سدیمی داشتند که پس از خوابانیدن خاک به مدت 2 ماه، آبشویی صورت گرفت. 
کلیدواژه‌ها
آبشویی نمک؛ تنفس میکروبی؛ درصد سدیم تبادلی؛ رس قابل انتشار؛ ضایعات آلی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Effect of Incubation Times, Gypsum, Organic Carbon, and Leaching on Some Properties of a Sodic Soil
نویسندگان [English]
M. Vafaee1؛ A. Golchin2؛ S. Shafiei3
1M.Sc. Student, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan
2Professor, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan
3Assistant Professor, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jiroft
چکیده [English]
Sodic soils are widely spread in arid and semiarid regions. To use sodic soils for crop production, reclamation of physico-chemical properties of these soils is necessary. To study the effects of different levels of gypsum (0, 50 and 100% of gypsum requirement) alone and with three levels of organic carbon (0, 1.5 and 3% w/w) from different sources (alfalfa and corn residue, saw dust and date fruit waste) on some properties of a sodic soil, a factorial experiment was conducted with 27 treatments and three replications using a completely randomized design. After application of gypsum or gypsum+ organic matter to the sodic soil, the physic-chemical properties of it were measured every 15 days. The studied soil was leached at the end of the incubation time. The results showed that the physicochemical characteristics of the sodic soil improved with the increase in incubation time. Before performing leaching treatment, the application of gypsum equal to gypsum requirement had the greatest impact on decreasing SAR, ESP, and dispersible clay (DC). Maximum microbial respiration rate was obtained from the application of 3% organic carbon from date fruit waste. The application of organic materials + gypsum had the greatest impact on improvement of sodic soil behaviors after leaching. The addition of organic matter caused some characteristics of sodic soil to become undesirable before leaching. After leaching, pH, SAR, ESP, DC and hydraulic conductivity (HC) decreased in all treatments. The treatment of gypsum at the rate of 100% gypsum requirement + 3% organic carbon from date fruit waste was the most effective reclamation treatment for the sodic soil. The organic materials + gypsum had the maximum reclamation effect on sodic soils, when the soils had been leached two months after incubation.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Dispersible clay, Exchangeable sodium percentage, Salt leaching, Microbial respiration, Organic waste
مراجع
  1. Abbott, L.K., and Murphy, D.V. 2003. Soil biological fertility: a key to sustainable land use in agriculture. Published by Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Natherlands.
  2. Ahmad, S., Ghafoor, A., Qadir, M. and Aziz, M. 2006. Amelioration of a calcareous saline-sodic soil by gypsum application and different crop rotations. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 8(1): 142-146.
  3. Akhtar, M. S., Steenhuis, T. S., Richards, B. K. and McBride, M. B. (2003) Chloride and lithium transport in large arrays of undisturbed silt loam and sandy loam soil columns. Vadose Zone Journal. 2, 715-727.
  4. Amezketa, E., Aragues, R. and Gazol, R. 2005. Efficiency of sulfuric acid, mined gypsum, and two gypsum by-products in soil crusting prevention and sodic soil reclamation. Agronomy Journal. 97(3): 983-989.
  5. Ammari, T. G., Tahboub, A. B., Saoub, H. M., Hattar, B. I. and Al-Zubi, Y. A. 2008. Salt removal efficiency as influenced by phyto-amelioration of salt-affected soils. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment. 6(3/4): 456-460.
  6. Banaei, M. H. 2000. Soil resources and use potentiality map of Iran. Soil and Water Research Institute. Tehran, Iran (In Persian).
  7. Barral, M. T., Buján, E., Devesa, R., Iglesias, M. L. and Velasco-Molina, M. 2007. Comparison of the structural stability of pasture and cultivated soils. Science of the Total Environment. 378(1): 174-178.
  8. Barzegar, A. R., Nelson, P. N., Oades, J. M. and Rengasamy, P. 1997. Organic matter, sodicity, and clay type: Influence on soil aggregation. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 61(4): 1131-1137.
  9. Barzegar, A.R. 2008 Salt affected soils: Diagnosis and Productivity.2nd Edition, Shahid Chamran University.
  10. Bednarz, C. W., Nichols, R. L. and Brown, S. M. 2007. Within-boll yield components of high yielding cotton cultivars. Crop Science. 47(5): 2108-2112.
  11. Bower, C.A., and Hatchea, J.T. 1966. Simultaneous determination of surface area and cation exchange capacity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 30: 525-527.
  12. Bremner, J.M., and Mulvaney, C.S. 1982. Nitrogen total. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. 9: 595-624.
  13. Carter, M.R., and Gregorich, E.G. 2008. Soil Sampling and Methods Analysis. 2nd Edition. Canadian Society of Soil Science Publisher. 823p.
  14. Chaum, S., Pokasombat, Y., and Kirdmanee, C.  2011.  Remediation of  salt-affected  soil  by  gypsum  and  farmyard  manure  importance  for  the  production  of Jasmine rice. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 5: 458-465.
  15. Chorom, M., and Rengasamy, P. 1997. Blue arrow e-Alerts. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 35: 1. 149-162.
  16. Collins, H. P., Elliott, L. F. and Papendick, R. I. 1990. Wheat straw decomposition and changes in decomposability during field exposure. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 54(4): 1013-1016.
  17. Conway, T. 2001. Plant materials and techniques for brine site reclamation (No. 26). Plant Materials Technical Note.
  18. Dahlawi, S., Naeem, A., Rengel, Z. and Naidu, R. 2018. Biochar application for the remediation of salt-affected soils: Challenges and opportunities. Science of the Total Environment. 625: 320-335.
  19. Eltaif, N. I. and Gharaibeh, M. A. 2008. Impact of alum on crust prevention and aggregation of calcareous soil: laboratory studies. Soil Use and Management. 24(4): 424-426.
  20. Franzen, D. W. and Richardson, J. L. 2000. Soil factors affecting iron chlorosis of soybean in the Red River Valley of North Dakota and Minnesota. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 23(1): 67-78.
  21. Gharaibeh, M. A., Eltaif, N. I. and Shra’ah, S. H. 2010. Reclamation of a calcareous saline sodic soil using phosphoric acid and by product gypsum. Soil Use and Management. 26(2): 141-148.
  22. Hanay, A., Buyuksonmez, F., Kiziloglu, F.M., and Canbolat, M.Y. 2004. Reclamation of saline-sodic soils with gypsum and MSW compost. Compost Science and Utilization. 12: 175–179.
  23. Handayanto, E., Cadisch, G. and Giller, K. E. 1995. Manipulation of quality and mineralization of tropical legume tree prunings by varying nitrogen supply. Plant and Soil. 176(1): 149-160.
  24. Hussain, N., Hassan, G., Arshadullah, M. and Mujeeb, F. 2001. Evaluation of amendments for the improvement of physical properties of sodic soil. International Journal Agriculture Biology. 14 (3): 319-322.
  25. Jalali, M. and Ranjbar, F. 2009. Effects of sodic water on soil sodicity and nutrient leaching in poultry and sheep manure amended soils. Geoderma. 153(1): 194-204.
  26. Kausar, M. A., & Muhammed, S. 1972. Comparison of biological and chemical methods for reclaiming saline-sodic soils. Pakistan Journal Science Research. 24: 252-261.
  27. Keren, R., 1996. Reclamation of sodic-affected soils. In: Agassi, M. (Ed.), Soil Erosion, Conservation and Rehabilitation. New York, Marcel Dekker, pp. 353–374.
  28. Klute, A. and Dirksen, C. 1986. Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity:Laboratory methods. Methods of  Soil Analysis: Part 1-Physical and Mineralogical Methods. (methodsofsoilan1). 687-734.
  29. Lanyon, L. E. and Heald, W. R. 1982. Magnesium, calcium, strontium, and barium. Pp.247-262. In: Page, A. L. (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Guilford Rd., Madison, WI 53711, USA.
  30. Lebron, I., Suarez, D. L. and Yoshida, T. 2002. Gypsum effect on the aggregate size and geometry of three sodic soils under reclamation. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 66(1): 92-98.
  31. Loveland, P. and Webb, J. 2003. Is there a critical level of organic matter in the agricultural soils of temperate regions: a review. Soil and Tillage Research. 70(1): 1-18.
  32. Makoi, J. H., & Ndakidemi, P. A. 2007. Reclamation of sodic soils in northern Tanzania, using locally available organic and inorganic resources. African Journal of Biotechnology. 11(2): 6(16).
  33. McNeal, B. L., Norvell, W. A. and Coleman, N. T. 1966. Effect of solution composition on the swelling of extracted soil clays. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 30(3):313-317.
  34. Nelson, P. N. and Oades, J. M. 1998. Organic matter sodicity and soil structure. In: sodic solis: Distribution, Processes, Management and Environmental Consequences. (Eds M. E. Sumner and R. Naidu) Oxford University Press, New York.
  35. Nelson, P. N., Baldock, J. A., Clarke, P., Oades, J. M. and Churchman, G. J. 1999. Dispersed clay and organic matter in soil: their nature and associations. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 37: 289-316.
  36. Page, A. L., Miller, R. H. and Keeney, D. R. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of soil analysis. Part. 2: 539-579.
  37. Qadir, M., Ghafoor, A. and Murtaza, G. 2001. Use of saline–sodic waters through phytoremediation of calcareous saline–sodic soils. Agricultural Water Management. 50(3): 197-210.
  38. Qadir, M., Oster, J. D., Schubert, S., Noble, A. D. and Sahrawat, K. L. 2007. Phytoremediation of sodic and saline‐sodic soils. Advances in Agronomy. 96: 197-247.
  39. Qadir, M., Steffens, D., Yan, F. and Schubert, S. 2003. Sodium removal from a calcareous saline–sodic soil through leaching and plant uptake during phytoremediation. Land Degradation and Development. 14(3): 301-307.
  40. Rengasamy, P., Greene, R. S. B., Ford, G. W. and Mehanni, A. H. 1984. Identification of dispersive behaviour and the management of red-brown earths.Soil Research. 22(4): 413-431.
  41. Rietz, D. N. and Haynes, R. J. 2003. Effects of irrigation-induced salinity and sodicity on soil microbial activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 35(6): 845-854.
  42. Robbins, C. W. (1984). Sodium adsorption ratio-exchangeable sodium percentage relationships in
  43. Sahrawat, K. L. 1984. Effects of temperature and moisture on urease activity in semi-arid tropical soils. Plant and Soi. 78(3): 401-408.
  44. Sharma, D. K., Singh, A., Sharma, P. C., Dagar, J. C. and Chaudhari, S. K. 2016. Sustainable Management of Sodic Soils for Crop Production: Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Soil Salinity and Water Quality. 8(2): 109-130.
  45. Silvertooth, J. C and Norton. E. R. 2000. Evaluation of a calcium-based soil Conditioner in irrigated Cotton.
  46. Tejada, M. and Gonzalez, J. L. 2006. The relationships between erodibility and erosion in a soil treated with two organic amendments. Soil and Tillage Research. 91(1): 186-198.
  47. Toth, G.,Montanarella, L. and Rusco, E. 2008.  Updated map of salt affected soils in the European Union. In: Toth, G.,Montanarella, L., & Rusco, E (Eds), Threats to soil quality in Europe, office for the official publication of the european communities, Luxembourg, pp. 61-74.
  48. Tripathi, S., Kumari, S., Chakraborty, A., Gupta, A., Chakrabarti, K. and Bandyapadhyay, B. K. 2006. Microbial biomass and its activities in salt-affected coastal soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 42(3): 273-277.
  49. Udayasoorian, C., Sebastian, S.P., and Jayabalakrishnan, R.M. 2009. Effect of amendments on problem soils with poor quality irrigation water under sugarcane crop. American-Eurasian J. Agric. and Environ. Sci. 5: 618-626.
  50. Vance, E. D., Brookes, P. C. and Jenkinson, D. S. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil biology and Biochemistry. 19(6): 703-707.
  51. Walker, D. J. and Bernal, M. P. 2008. The effects of olive mill waste compost and poultry manure on the availability and plant uptake of nutrients in a highly saline soil. Bioresources Technology. 99: 396-403.
  52. Walkley, A. and Black, I. A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil science, 37(1), 29-38.
  53. Willson, T. C., Paul, E. A. and Harwood, R. R. 2001. Biologically active soil organic matter fractions in sustainable cropping systems. Applied Soil Ecology.16 (1): 63-76.
  54. Wong, V. N., Dalal, R. C. and Greene, R. S. 2008. Salinity and sodicity effects on respiration and microbial biomass of soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 44(7): 943-953.
  55. Wong, V. N., Dalal, R. C. and Greene, R. S. 2009. Carbon dynamics of sodic and saline soils following gypsum and organic material additions: a laboratory incubation. Applied Soil Ecology. 41(1): 29-40.
  56. Wong, V. N., Greene, R. S. B., Dalal, R. C. and Murphy, B. W. 2010. Soil carbon dynamics in saline and sodic soils: a review. Soil Use and Management. 26(1): 2-11.
  57. Yazdanpanah, N. and Mahmoodabadi, M. 2011. Time monitoring of leachate quality during reclamation process of saline-sodic soil using soil column. Electronic Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production. 1(1): 1-20. (In Persian).
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 769
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 673


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب