| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,196 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,423 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 52,248,621 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 91,780,711 |
واکنش تابعی سن شکارگر Nesidiocoris tenuis به تراکمهای مختلف تخم های بید آرد Ephestia kuehniella و بید گوجه فرنگی Tuta absoluta | ||
| آفات و بیماری های گیاهی | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 86، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 107، اسفند 1397، صفحه 203-217 اصل مقاله (290.3 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: حشره شناسی کشاورزی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jaep.2019.123619.1249 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سید حسن ملکشی1؛ جعفر محقق نیشابوری* 2؛ رضا طلایی حسنلویی3؛ حسین اللهیاری3 | ||
| 1موسسۀ تحقیقات گیاه‏پزشکی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2موسسه تحقیقات گیاهپزشکی کشور | ||
| 3دانشکدۀ علوم و مهندسی کشاورزی پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| واکنش تابعی رابطة بین تعداد شکار مصرفشده به ازای هر شکارگر در تراکمهای مختلف شکار را بیان میکند و یکی از روشهای تعیین کارایی دشمنان طبیعی در کنترل آفات است. واکنش تابعی سن شکارگرNesidiocoris tenuis با تغذیه از تراکمهای مختلف تخمهای بید آرد و بید گوجهفرنگی (1، 2، 4، 8، 16، 32، 64، و 96) در شرایط آزمایشگاه در هفت تکرار بررسی شد. تراکمها به مدت 24 ساعت بهطور جداگانه در اختیار یک حشرة بالغ ماده و یا نر که قبلاً به مدت 24 ساعت گرسنه بود، قرار گرفتند. واکنش تابعی براساس رگرسیون لجستیک در همة آزمایشها از نوع سوم (III) بود. ضریب نرخ یورش (b) حشرة بالغ ماده با تغذیه از تخمهای بیدآرد و بید گوجهفرنگی بهترتیب 0018/0±0061/0 و 0009/0±0048/0 و ضریب نرخ یورش (b) حشرة بالغ نر نیز با تغذیه از تخمهای یادشده بهترتیب 0037/0±0093/0 و 0010/0±0042/0 برآورد شد. پراسنجة زمان دستیابی (Th) در طعمههای یادشده برای حشرة ماده بهترتیب 0193/0 ± 3598/0 و 0136/0 ± 2905/0 ساعت و زمان دستیابی برای حشرة نر نیز بهترتیب 0511/0±9032/0 و 0303/0±5895/0 ساعت تخمین زده شد. بنابراین حشرات مادة N. tenuis با زمان دستیابی کمتر و نرخ یورش بیشتر نسبت به نرها و با میانگین بیشترین میزان تغذیة روزانه (V0) از تخمهای بید گوجهفرنگی (86/73 عدد) میتوانند نقش مؤثری در مهار جمعیت آفت داشته باشند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| گوجه فرنگی؛ سن شکارگر Nesidiocoris tenuis؛ زمان دستیابی؛ نرخ یورش؛ مهار زیستی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Functional response of Nesidiocoris tenuis on different densities of Ephestia kuehniella and Tuta absoluta eggs | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Seyed Hassan Malkeshi1؛ Jafar Mohaghegh2؛ Reza Talaei Hassanlouii3؛ Hossein Allahyari3 | ||
| 1Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education & Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection | ||
| 3Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| T The response of a natural enemy to its host’ densities has been defined as “functional response”. It has been considered a feasible technique to measure the efficacy of biocontrol agents. We employed the concept to evaluate the functional response of adult female and male of Nesidiocoris tenuis under laboratory conditions by feeding on different densities (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 96) of Ephestia kuehniella and Tuta absoluta eggs in 7 replicates. The predators were kept unfed for 24 hours. Then the number of eaten prey was recorded after 24 hours. The results showed type III functional response for all tests based on logistic regression. The attack constants (b) of females and males fed on E. kuehniella and T. absoluta eggs were 0.0061 ± 0.0018, 0.0048 ± 0.0009, and 0.0093 ± 0.0037, 0.0042 ± 0.001, respectively. The estimated handling times (Th) for females and males on the respective preys were 0.3598 ± 0.0193, 0.2905 ± 0.0136, and 0.9032 ± 0.0511 and 0.5859 ± 0.0303 h. In conclusion, N. tenuis females had shorter handling time, greater attack rate and maximum daily consumption (73.86 eggs) compared with those of males. Therefore, results strongly support that female predators could be more effective in controlling T. absoluta. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Attack rate, biological control, handling time, Nesidiocoris tenuis, Tuta absoluta | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
ATTARAN, M. R. 1996. Effect of laboratory hosts on biological attributes of parasitoid wasp Bracon hebetor Say. M.S. thesis, Tarbiat Modarres University, Iran (in Persian with English summary). BANIAMERI, V. and A. CHRAGHIAN, 2012. The first report and control strategies of Tutaabsoluta in Iran, Eppo bulletin 42, 322-324. CALVO, J., BOLACKMANS, K. STANSLY, P.A. and URBANEJA, A. 2009. Predation by Nesidiocoris tenuis on Bemisia tabaci and injury to tomato, BioControl 54:237–246. CARNERO, A., DIAZ, S., AMADOR, S., HERNANDEZ, M. and HERNANDEZ, E. 2000, Impact of Nesidiocoris tenuis on whitefly populations in protected tomato crops, IOBC⁄WPRS Bulletin 23: 259. CASTANE, C. and ZAPATA, R. 2005. Rearing the predatory bug Macrolophus caliginosus on a meat-based diet, Biological Control, 34: 66 – 72. CASTANE, C., J., ARNO, R. GABARRA and ALOMAR, O. 2011. Plant damage to vegetable crops by zoophytophagous mirid predators, Biological Control, 59(1): 22–29. DE CLERCQ, P., MOHAGHEGH, J. and TIRRY, L. 2000. Effect of host plant on the functional response of the predators Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), Biological Control, 18, 65-70. DE PUYSSELEYR, V., DE MAN, S., HÖFTE, M. and DE CLERCQ, P. 2013. Plantless rearing of the zoophytophagous bug Nesidiocoris tenuis. BioControl 58: 205-213 DESNEUX, N., WAJENBERG, E., WYCKHUYS, KAG., BURGIO, G., ARPAIA, S., NARVAEZ-VASQUEZ, CA., GONZALEZ- CABRERA, J., RUESCAS, DC., TABONE, E. and FRANDON, J. 2010. Biological invasion of European tomato crops by Tuta absoluta: ecology, geographic expansion and prospects for biological control, Journal Pest Science. 83:197–215. ENKEGAARD, A., BRODSGAARD H. F. and HANSEN, D.L. 2001. Macrolophus caliginosus: Functional response to whiteflies and preference and switching capacity between whiteflies and spider mites, Entomolgia Experimentalis et Applicata, 101, 81-88. FANTINOU, A.A., PERDIKIS, D. C., MASELOU, D. A. and LAMBEROPOULOS, P.D. 2008. Prey killing without consumption: does Macrolophus pygmaeus show adaptive foraging behavior? Biological Control, 47: 187–193. FANTINOU, A. A., PERDIKIS, D. C., MASELOU, D. A. and LAMBEROPOULOS, P. D. 2009. Preference and consumption of Macrolophus pygmaeus preying on mixed instar assemblages of Myzus persicae, Biological Control, 51: 76–80. FARHADI, R., ALLAHYARI, H. and JULIANO, S. A. 2010. Functional response of larval and adult stages of Hippodamia variegata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to different densities of Aphis fabae (Hemiptera: Aphididae), Environmental Entomological, 39:1586–1592. FARHADI, R., ALLAHYARI, H., AZMAYESHFARD, P., FATAHHOSEINI, S. and HEYDARI, S. 2010. Functional response of adult male and female Hippodamia variegata Goeze (Col.: Coccinellidae) to different densities of Aphis fabae Scopoli, Iranian Journal Plant Protection Science, 41, 1: 143-150, (in Persian with English summary). FOGLAR, H., MALAUSA, J. C. and WAJNBERG, E. 1990. The functional response and preference of Macrolophus caliginosus (Heteroptera: Miridae) for two of its prey: Myzus persicae and Tetranychus urticae, Entomophaga, 35:465–474. GAVKARE, O., SHARMA, P. L., SANCHEZ J. A. and SHAH, M. A. 2017. Functional response of Nesidiocoris tenuis (Hemiptera: Miridae) to the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, Biocontrol Science and Technology, 27 (9): 1118–1122. HASSANPOR, M., BAGHERI, M. R., GOLIZADEH, A. and FARROKHI, SH. 2016. Functional response of Nesidiocoris tenuis (Hemiptera: Miridae) to Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), effect of different host plants, Biocontrol Science and Technology, HASSELL, M. P. 2000. The spatial and temporal dynamics of host parasitoid interactions. Oxford University Press, London, UK. 200 pp. HASSELL, M. P. 1978. The dynamics of Arthropod predator-prey System Princeton University Press. HASSELL, M. P., LAWTON, J. H. and BEDDINGTON, JR. 1977. Sigmoid functional response by invertebrate predators and parasitoids, Journal Animal Ecology, 46:249–262. HOLLING, C. S. 1959. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism, Canadian, Entomology, 91: 385- 398. HOLLING, C. S. 1966. Functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density, Entomological HOUCK, M. A. and R. E. STRAUSS, 1985. The comparative study of functional responses: experimental design and statistical interpretation, Canadian Entomologist, 117: 617–629 JULIANO, S. A. 2001. Non-linear curve fitting: predation and functional response curves, In: S.M., SCHEINER, and J., GUREVITCH (Eds.), Design and analysis of ecological experiments, (pp. 178–196), New York: Chapman and Hall. KHOSHABI, J. 2015. Investigation on the effects of abamectin, acetamiprid and indoxacarb on some biological traits of predatory bug Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter), Thesis for the MSc. Degree, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Tehran, 128 pp., (in Persian with English summary). LINNVUORI, R. 2007. Studies on the Miridae (Heteroptera) of Gilan and the adjacent provinces in Northern Iran, II List of species, Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, 47: 17-56. MADBOUNIi, M. A. Z., SAMIH, M. A., NAMVAR, P. and BIONDI, A. 2017. Temperature-dependent functional response of Nesidiocoris tenuis (Hemiptera: Miridae) to different densities of pupae of cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), European Journal Entomology, 114: 325–331. MALKESHI, S. H., TALAEI HASSANLOUII, R., MOHAGHEGH, J. and ALLAHYARI, H. 2017. Predation rate and prey preference of Nesidiocoris tenuis on Ephestia kuehniella and Tuta absoluta eggs in laboratory, Biocontrol in Plant Protection, 5 (1): 31-43, (in Persian with English summary). MESSINA, F. J. and HANKS, J. B. 1998. Host plants alters the shape of the functional response of an aphid predator (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Environmental Entomology, 27, 1196- 1202. MICHAELIDES, G., SFENTHOURAKIS, S., PITSILLOU, M. and SERAPHIDES, N. 2017. Functional response and multiple predator effects of two generalist predators preying on Tuta absoluta eggs, Pest management science, 74: 332–339. MILONAS, P. G., KONTODIMAS, D. CH. and MARTINOU, A. F. 2011. A predator’s functional response: Influence of prey species and size, Biological Control, 59: 141–146. MOHAGHEGH, J., DE CLERCQ, P. and TIRRY, L. 2001. Functional response of the predators Podisus maculiventris (Say) and Podisus nigrispinus (Dallas) (Het.: Pentatomidae) to the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (lep: Noctuidae): effect of temperature, Journal of applied entomology 125:131-134. MOLLA, O., BIONDI, A., ALONSO-VALIENTE, M. and URBANEGA, A. 2014. A comparative life history study of two mirid bugs preying on Tuta absoluta and Ephestia kuehniella eggs on tomato crops, implications for biological control, BioControl, 59(2): 175–183. MOLLA, O., MONTON, H., VANACLOCHA, P., BEITIA F. and URBANEGA, A. 2009. Predation by the mirids Nesidiocoris tenuis and Macrolophus pygmaeus on the tomato borer Tuta absoluta, IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 49:209–214. MONTSERRAT, M., ALBAJES, R. and CASTANE, C. 2000. Functional response of four heteropteran predators preying on greenhouse whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) and western flower thrips (Tysanoptera: Thripidae), Environmental Entomology. 29:1075–1082. MURDOUH, W.W. and OATEN, A. 1975. Predation and population stability, Advances in Ecological Research, 9:2- 131. NORUZI, F., MADADI, H. and TALAEI-HASSANLOUI, R. 2015. Functional Response of Predatory Bug, Orius albidipennis (Reuter) to Melon Aphid, Aphis gossypii (Glover) and Two Spotted Spider Mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, Journal of Applied Researches in Plant Protection, 3 (2): 69-77, (in Persian with English summary). PERDIKIS, D., FANTINOU, A., GARANTONAKIS, N., PAVLOS, K. P., MASELOU, D. and Panagakis, S. 2009. Studies on the damage potential of the predator Nesidiocoris tenuis on tomato plants, Bulletin of Insectology, 62, 41-46. ROGERS, D. 1972. Random search and insect population models, Journal of Animal Ecology, 41, 369–383. SANCHEZ, J. A. and LACAZA, A. 2008. Impact of the zoophytophagous plant bug Nesidiocoris tenuis (Het.: Miridae) on tomato yield, Journal Economic Entomological, 101:1864–1870. SHARIFIAN, I., SABAHI, Q. and KHOSHABI, J. 2016. Functional response of Macrolophus pygmaeus (Rambur) and Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) feeding on two different prey species, Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 48: 910–920. SOARES, A. O., CODERRE, D. and SCHANDERL, H. 2003. Effect of temperature and intraspecific allometry on predation by two phenotypes of Harmonia axyridis Pallas (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environmental Entomology, 32: 939–944. SOHRABI, F. and HOSSEINI, R. 2015. Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) (Heteroptera: Miridae), a predatory species of the tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Iran, Journal of plant protection research, 55, No. 3: 322-323, (in Persian with English summary). SOLOMON, M. E. 1949. The natural control of animal populations, Journal Animal Ecological, 18: 1-35. URBANEJA, A., TAPIA,G. and STANSLY, P. A. 2005. Influence of host plant and prey availability on the developmental time and survival of Nesidiocoris tenuis Reuter (Hetetroptera: Miridae), Biocontrol Science Technological, 15:513–518. URBANEJA, A., MONTON, H. and MOLLA, O. 2009. Suitability of the tomato borer Tuta absoluta as prey for Macrolophus caliginosus and Nesidiocoris tenuis, Journal of Applied Entomology, 133:292–296. URBANEJA, A., GONZALEZ-CABRERA, J., ARNO, J. and ABARRA, R. 2012. Prospects for the biological control of Tuta absoluta in tomatoes of the Mediterranean basin, Pest Manage Science, 68:1215–1222. WEGULO, S. N., P. SUN, C. A. MARTINSON and X. B. YANG, 2000. Spread of Sclerotinia stem rot of soybean from area and point sources of apothecial inoculum. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 80: 389–402. YOUSEFDOOST, V. and Y. GHOSTA, 2013. First report of sclerotinia head rot of cabbage in Iran. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology, 49(3): 361-362. (In Persian with English abstract) ZADOKS, J.C. 1985. On the conceptual basis of crop loss assessment: The threshold theory. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 23:455-473. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 882 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 767 |
||