| تعداد نشریات | 285 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 83 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,084 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,407 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 48,520,070 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 79,124,812 |
تأثیر هیدروپرایمینگ بذر و روش کاشت بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد ذرت در شرایط کم آبیاری | ||
| به زراعی نهال و بذر | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 34، شماره 1، خرداد 1397، صفحه 53-71 اصل مقاله (242.57 K) | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/sppj.2018.118101 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فرهاد صادقی* 1؛ مصیب نوروزی2؛ علی لطفی2؛ رسول جلیلیان2 | ||
| 1، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان کرمانشاه، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرمانشاه، ایران | ||
| 2مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان کرمانشاه، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرمانشاه، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به‌منظور بررسی تأثیر هیدروپرایمینگ بذر، روش کاشت و کمآبیاری بر عملکرد ذرت سینگل کراس 704، آزمایشی به‌صورت فاکتوریل بر پایه طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار طی سال‌های 95-1394 در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی اسلام‌آباد غرب اجرا شد. فاکتورهای آزمایشی شامل پرایمینگ بذر در دو سطح (بدون پرایم و هیدروپرایمینگ) و روش کاشت در دو سطح (روی پشته و در کف جوی) در سه محیط آبیاری (تأمین 100، 85 و 70 درصد نیاز آبی گیاه) بود. نتایج تجزیه واریانس نشان داد که اثر سال، رژیم آبیاری و پرایمینگ بذر بر عملکرد دانه در سطح احتمال یک درصد معنی‌دار بود در حالی که اثر روش کاشت معنی‌دار نبود. اثر متقابل رژیم آبیاری × پرایمینگ بذر × روش کشت بر عملکرد دانه در سطح احتمال پنج درصد معنی‌دار بود و بالاترین مقدار این صفت (289/13 تن در هکتار) با هیدروپرایمینگ بذر و کشت در کف جوی و تأمین 100 درصد نیاز آبی گیاه به دست آمد. عملکرد دانه در تیمار هیدروپرایمینگ بذر 973/10 تن در هکتار بود (در حدود 650 کیلوگرم در هکتار بیشتر از تیمار بدون پرایم). با توجه به نتایج به دست آمده توصیه می‌شود کشاورزان با انجام هیدروپرایمینگ بذر و کشت در کف جوی، عملکرد دانه ذرت را افزایش دهند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ذرت؛ رژیم آبیاری؛ پرایمینگ بذر؛ کشت در کف جوی؛ عملکرد دانه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effects of Seed Hydropriming and Planting Method on Yield and Yield Components of Corn under Deficit Irrigation Conditions | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| F. Sadeghi1؛ M. Norouzi2؛ A. Lotfi2؛ R. Jalilian2 | ||
| 1Seed and Plant Improvement Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Kermanshah, Iran | ||
| 2Seed and Plant Improvement Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Kermanshah, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| To evaluate the effect of seed hydropriming, planting method and deficit irrigation on the yield of corn (cv. KSC 704), an experiment was conducted in a factorial based on a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications during 2015–16 at the Agricultural Research Station of Islamabad, Kermanshah, Iran. The experimental factors consisted of seed priming in two levels (no primed and hydropriming) and planting methods in two levels (on-ridge and in-furrow) in three irrigation environments (supplying 100, 85 and 70% of the crop water requirement). The results of the analysis of variance showed that the effects of year, irrigation and seed priming on grain yield were significant (p≤0.01), whereas the effect of planting method was not significant. Interaction of irrigation regime × seed priming × cultivar on grain yield was significant (p≤0.05) and the highest value of this trait (13.289 t ha-1) was obtained by seed hydropriming and planting in-furrow and supplying 100% of the crop water requirement. Grain yield in seed hydropriming treatment was 10.973 t ha-1 (about 650 kg ha-1 more than no primed treatment). According to the results, it is recommended that farmers increase grain yield of corn by seed hydropriming and in-furrow planting. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Corn, Irrigation regime, Seed priming, In-furrow planting, Grain yield | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbasdokht, H., and Edalatpisheh, M. R. 2012. Effect of seed priming and different levels of urea on yield and yield component of two corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Iranian Journal of Crop Science 3: 381-389 (in Persian).
Abbasdokht, H., Gholami, A., and Asghari, H. 2014. Halopriming and hydropriming treatments to overcome salt and drought stress at germination stage of corn (Zea mays L.). Desert 19 (1): 27-34.
Abdolrahmani, A., Ghasemi-Golezani, K., Valizadeh, M., Feizi-Asl, V., and Tavakoli, A. R. 2011. Effect of seed priming on the growth trend and grain yield of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cv. Abidar under rainfed conditions. Seed and Plant Production Journal 27-2 (1): 111-129 (in Persian).
Abdul-Baki, A. A., and Anderson, J. D. 1970. Viability and leaching of sugars from germinating barley. Crop Science 10: 31-34. Agerich, C. A., Bradford, K. J., and Tarquis, M. 1989. The effect of priming and aging on resistance to deterioration of tomato seeds. American Journal of Botany 70: 593-598.
Anonymous. 2008. Hand Book for Seedling Evaluation (3rd ed.). International Seed Testing Association (ISTA), Zurich, Switzerland. Ashraf, M., and Harris, P. J. C. 2005. A Biotic Stress: Plant Resistance through Breeding and Molecular Approaches. Haworth Press Lnc., New York, US. Pp. 513-544.
Basra, A. S., Bedi, S., and Malik, C. P. 1988. Pre-sowing hydration of maize seeds for stimulation of low-temperature germination and its effects on phospholipid changes in the embryos. Current Science Journal 57: 1340-1342.
Cakir, R. 2004. Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crops Research 89:1-6.
Choukan, R. 2012. Situation of production of corn in Iran and worldwide. Proceedings of the 12rd Iranian Crop Sciences Congress. Islamic Azad University of Karaj. Pp. 1-19 (in Persian).
Demir, I., and Mavi, S. 2004. The effect of priming on seedling emergence of differentially matured watermelon seeds. International Journal of Science and Research 104: 101-110.
Duman, I. 2006. Effect of seed priming with PEG and K3PO4 on germination and seedling growth in Lettuce. Pakistan Journal of Biology Science 9(5): 923-928.
Afsharmanesh, Gh. 2014. Effect of planting pattern on grain yield and agronomic traits of corn cultivars in Jiroft, Iran. Applied Field Crops Research 27(1): 124-130 (in Persian).
Eskandari, A., Zand E., Allahdadi, B., and Baghestani Meybodi, M. A. 2007. The effects of herbicide usage and corn (Zea mays L.) planting pattern on yield and some of the physiological indices of corn under competition with weeds. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi Journal 77: 143-152 (in Persian).
Farid, M., Niknejad, M., and Emam, Y. 1994. Analysis of phytomass in 36 Iranian winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.) genotypes. Iran Agricultural Research 15(1): 69-77.
Farooq, M., Basra, S. M. A., Tabassum, R., and Ahmad, N. 2006a. Evaluation of seed vigor enhancement techniques on physiological and biochemical techniques on physiological basis in coars rice. Seed Science and Technology 34:741-750.
Farooq, M., Basra, S. M. A., Warraich, E. A., and Khaliq, A. 2006b. Optimization of hydropriming techniques for rice seed invigoration. Seed Science and Technology 34: 507-512.
Ghanbari, D., Barzegar, E., and Khoramiyan, M. 2010. Effect of planting pattern and herbicide on weeds, yield and water use efficiency of corn (KSC 704). Iranian Journal of Crop Science 45: 1-19 (in Persian).
Hassanzadeh-Moghadam, H., and Basafa, M. 2005. Effect of planting density on yield of forage maize in saline areas. Ninth Congress of Crop Plants, Tehran University (Abu-Rayhan). Pp. 71 (in Persian).
Harris, D., Joshi, A., Khan, P. A., Gothkar, P., and Spdhi, P. S. 1999. On-farm seed priming in semi- arid agriculture: Development and evaluation in maize, rice and chickpea in India using participatory methods. Exploration Agriculture Journal 35: 15 -29.
Harris, D., Pathan, A. K., Gothkar, P., Joshi, A., Chivasa, W., and Nyamudeza, P. 2001. On-farm seed priming: using participatory methods to revive and refine a key technology. Agricultural Systems Journal 69: 151-164.
Harris, D., Rashid, A., Hollington, P. A., Jasi, L., and Riches, C. 2002. Prospects of improving maize yields with on-farm seed priming. In: Hernandez, L. F. and Orioli, G. A. 1985. Imbibition and germination rates of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seeds according to fruit size. Field Crops Research 10: 355-360.
Karaminejad, M., Zand, E., and Baghestani, M. A. 2015. Comparison of different planting patterns of maize (Zea mays L.) on weed control. Iranian Journal of Weed Science 11: 173-182 (in Persian).
Khajeh Hosseini. M., Khajeh Hosseini, A. A., and Powel, I. J. B. 2003. The interaction between salinity stress and seed vigor during germination of soybean seed. Seed Science and Technology 27: 177-237.
Khan, A. A. 1992. Preplant Physiological Seed Conditioning. Horticultural Reviews Publication, USA. Pp. 131-181. Maguire, J. D. 1962. Speed of germination in selection and evaluation for seedling vigor. Crop Science 2: 176-177.
Mashal, M., Varavypour, M., Sadatnouri, S. A., and Zare-Zirak, E. 2008. Optimizing consumptive water depth for corn by deficit-Irrigation (case study: Varamin area). Agricultural Research Journal 8(4): 123-134 (in Persian).
Moradi, A., Akbari, G. H., Zand, E., Alahdadi, I., Baghestani, M. A., and Labafi, M. R. 2011. Effect of different planting methods on growth indices and yield of corn in competition with common purslane and pigweed. The Proceedings of the 4rd Iranian Weed Science Congress, Pp. 997-1000 (in Persian).
Murungu, F. S., Chiduza, C., Nyamugafata, P., Clark, L., Whalle, W. R., and Finch- Savage, W. E. 2004. Effects of on-farm seed priming on consecutive daily sowing occasions on the emergence and growth of maize in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Field Crops Research 89(1): 49-57.
Musharaf, K., Asim, M., Shah, F. M., Ullah, S., Saadullah, K. and Subhan, M. 2013. Response of maize yield and yield components to different hydropriming durations in rainfed region of Bannu. Enterprise Java Beans 6(1): 11-16.
Najafinezhad, M., Farzam-nia, M., and Javaheri, A. 2005. Effect of planting pattern on yield, agronomic characteristics and water use two varieties of corn. The Proceedings of the 9rd Congress of Crop Science, Pp. 205 (in Persian).
Parera, C. A., and Cantliffe, D. J. 1994. Pre-sowing seed priming. Horticultural Reviews 16: 109-141. Penman, H. L. 1948. Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 193: 120-145.
Sadeghian, S. Y., and Yavari, N. 2004. Effect of water-deficit stress on germination and early seedling growth in sugar beet. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 190: 138-144.
Sarhadi, A., Mohtasebi, R., Zand, E., and Baghestani, M. A. 2010. Effect of different corn sowing methods on weed control, growth and grain yield of corn. Agronomy Journal 88: 78-86 (in Persian).
Savage, W. E., Dent, K. C., and Clark, L. J. 2004. Soak condition and temperature following sowing influence the response of maize (Zea mays L.) seeds to on-farm priming (pre-sowing seed soak). Field Crop Research 90: 361-374.
Soltani, M., Azizi, F., Chaichi, M. R., and Heidari Sharifabad, H. 2012. Effect of irrigation regimes on some physiological, morphological and grain yield of new maize hybrids. Seed and Plant Production Journal 28-2(3): 347-362 (in Persian).
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 466 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 487 |
||