News

a.z
Rezaie, N., Razzaghi, F., Sepaskhah, A., Moosavi, S. (2018). Effect of Biochar and Saline Irrigation Water on Chemical Properties of Soil under Fababean Cultivation. , 32(1), 13-24. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2018.116556
N. Rezaie; F. Razzaghi; A. R. Sepaskhah; S. A. A. Moosavi. "Effect of Biochar and Saline Irrigation Water on Chemical Properties of Soil under Fababean Cultivation". , 32, 1, 2018, 13-24. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2018.116556
Rezaie, N., Razzaghi, F., Sepaskhah, A., Moosavi, S. (2018). 'Effect of Biochar and Saline Irrigation Water on Chemical Properties of Soil under Fababean Cultivation', , 32(1), pp. 13-24. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2018.116556
Rezaie, N., Razzaghi, F., Sepaskhah, A., Moosavi, S. Effect of Biochar and Saline Irrigation Water on Chemical Properties of Soil under Fababean Cultivation. , 2018; 32(1): 13-24. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2018.116556

Effect of Biochar and Saline Irrigation Water on Chemical Properties of Soil under Fababean Cultivation

پژوهش های خاک
Article 3, Volume 32, Issue 1, June 2018, Pages 13-24    PDF (371.34 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22092/ijsr.2018.116556
Authors
N. Rezaie1; F. Razzaghi* 2; A. R. Sepaskhah3; S. A. A. Moosavi4
1MSc., Water Engineering Department, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University
2Assistant Professor, Water Engineering Department and Drought Research Center, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University
3Professor, Water Engineering Department and Drought Research Center, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University
4Associate Professor, Soil Science Department, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University
Abstract
Nowadays, due to limited water resources and low soil fertility, especially in arid and semi-arid regions, the use of water with low quality (such as saline water) and soil amendments such as biochar is essential. Biochar is a kind of charcoal produced from plant residue and animal manure, which improves soil physical and chemical properties due to its porous structure. Therefore, the current research was conducted to investigate the effect of different levels of saline irrigation water and biochar on soil chemical properties under faba bean cultivation. Four saline irrigation water treatments having EC values of 0.5, 2.5, 5 and 7.5 dS m-1 and four levels of biochar including 0, 1.25, 2.5 and 3.75 % w/w were applied based on completely randomized design with three replications. Chemical properties such as potassium, calcium, and sodium ions concentration, sodium adsorption ratio, and electrical conductivity of saturated extract were measured in two depths of 0-10 and 10-20 cm. The results showed that increase in salinity and biochar levels increased the amount of sodium, potassium, and calcium ions and also soil electrical conductivity. Further, all ions concentration, sodium adsorption ratio, and electrical conductivity in the depth of 0-10 cm were higher than 10-20 cm depth, due to soil evaporation and water and solute movement towards upper layer. According to the results obtained in this study, it can be concluded that the use of biochar as a rich source of plant nutrients can greatly increase availability of nutrients such as calcium and potassium in soil, but, the negative effects of biochar application, such as increasing salinity, should be considered.
Keywords
sodium; Potassium; calcium; Electrical conductivity; Sodium adsorption ratio
References
  1. گویلی، ا.، ع .ع. موسوی و ع. ا. کامگار حقیقی. 1395. اثر بیوچار کود گاوی و تنش رطوبتی بر ویژگی‌های رشد و کارایی مصرف آب اسفناج در شرایط گلخانه‌ای. پژوهش آب در کشاورزی. 2/30 (2): 259-243.
  2. نجفی قیری، م. 1394. تأثیر کاربرد بیوچارهای مختلف بر برخی ویژگی‌های خاک و قابلیت جذب بعضی از عناصر غذایی در یک خاک آهکی. نشریه پژوهش‌های خاک (علوم خاک و آب). 29 (3): 358-351.
  3. Abiven, S., M. W. I. Schmidt, and J. Lehmann. 2014. Biochar by design. Nature Geoscience. 7(5): 326-327.
  4. Agegnehu, G., M.I. Bird, P.N. Nelson, and A.M. Bass. 2015. The ameliorating effects of biochar and compost on soil quality and plant growth on a Ferralsol. Soil Research. 53(1): 1-12.
  5. Anegbe, B., J.M. Okuo, E.O. Ewekay, and D.E. Ogbeifun. 2014. Fractionation of lead-acid battery soil amended with Biochar. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. 7(2): 36-43.
  6. Cheng, C.H., J. Lehmann, and M.H. Engelhard. 2008. Natural oxidation of black carbon in soils: changes in molecular form and surface charge along a climosequence. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 72(6): 1598-1610.
  7. Cheng, Y., Z.C. Cai, S.X. Chang, J. Wang, and J.B. Zhang. 2012. Wheat straw and its biochar have contrasting effects on inorganic N retention and N2O production in a cultivated Black Chernozem. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 48(8): 941-946.
  8. Danish, S., U. Younis, S. Nasreen, N. Akhtar, M. Ehsanullah, and M.T. Iqbal. 2015. Biochar consequences on cations and anions of sandy soil. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences. 6(2): 121-131.
  9. Enders, A., K. Hanley, T. Whitman, S. Joseph, and J. Lehmann. 2012. Characterization of biochars to evaluate recalcitrance and agronomic performance. Bioresource Technology. 114: 644-653.
  10. Fang, Y., B. Singh, B.P. Singh, and E. Krull. 2014. Biochar carbon stability in four contrasting soils. European Journal of Soil Science. 65(1): 60-71.
  11. Gaskin, J.W., C. Steiner, K. Harris, K.C. Das, and B. Bibens. 2008. Effect of low-temperature pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agricultural use. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. 51(6): 2061-2069.
  12. Glaser, B., J. Lehmann, and W. Zech. 2002. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal–a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 35(4): 219-230.
  13. Hammer, E.C., M. Forstreuter, M.C. Rillig, and J. Kohler. 2015. Biochar increases arbuscular mycorrhizal plant growth enhancement and ameliorates salinity stress. Applied Soil Ecology. 96: 114-121.
  14. Inal, A., A. Gunes, O. Sahin, M.B. Taskin, and E.C. Kaya. 2015. Impacts of biochar and processed poultry manure, applied to a calcareous soil, on the growth of bean and maize. Soil Use and Management. 31(1): 106-113.
  15. Kanwal, S., N. Ilyas, S. Shabir, M. Saeed, R. Gul, M. Zahoor, N. Batool, and R. Mazhar. 2018. Application of biochar in mitigation of negative effects of salinity stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Plant Nutrition. 41(4): 526-538.
  16. Khan, S., B.J. Reid, G. Li, and Y.G. Zhu. 2014. Application of biochar to soil reduces cancer risk via rice consumption: a case study in Miaoqian village, Longyan, China. Environment International. 68: 154-161.
  17. Knudsen, D., G.A. Peterson, and P.F. Pratt. 1982. Methods of Soil analysis . Part 2/2 ed Monograph No : 9, American Society of Agronomy. Madison WI, pp, 225-246.
  18. Kookana, R.S., A.K. Sarmah, L. van Zwieten, E. Krull, and B. Singh. 2011. Biochar application to soil: agronomic and environmental benefits and unintended consequences. Advances in Agronomy. 112: 103-143.
  19. Lashari, M.S., Y. Ye, H. Ji, L. Li, G.W. Kibue, H. Lu, and G. Pan. 2014. Biochar–manure compost in conjunction with pyroligneous solution alleviated salt stress and improved leaf bioactivity of maize in a saline soil from central China: a 2‐year field experiment. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture. 95(6): 1321-1327.
  20. Lehmann, J., J.P. Da Silva Jr, C. Steiner, T. Nehls, W. Zech, and B. Glaser. 2003. Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant and Soil. 249(2): 343-357.
  21. Matijevic, L. D. Romic, N. Maurovic, and M. Romic. 2012. Saline irrigation water affects element uptake by bean plant (Vicia faba L.). European Chemical Bulletin. 1(12): 498-502.
  22. Moameni, A. 2010. Geographical distribution and salinity levels of soil resources of Iran. Soil Research Journal. 24: 203-215. (In Persian).
  23. Nigussie, A., E. Kissi, M. Misganaw, and G. Ambaw. 2012. Effect of biochar application on soil properties and nutrient uptake of lettuces (Lactuca sativa. L.) grown in chromium polluted soils. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science. 12(3): 369-376.
  24. O’neill, B., J. Grossman, M.T. Tsai, J.E. Gomes, J. Lehmann, J. Peterson, E. Neves, and J.E. Thies. 2009. Bacterial community composition in Brazilian anthrosols and adjacent soils characterized using culturing and molecular identification. Microbial Ecology. 58(1): 23-35.
  25. Peng, F., P.W. He, Y. Luo, X. Lu, Y. Liang, and J. Fu. 2012. Adsorption of phosphate by biomass char deriving from fast pyrolysis of biomass waste. Clean Soil, Air, Water. 40(5): 493-498.
  26. Richards, L.A. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Soil Science. 78(2): 154-158.
  27. Suarez, D. L. 1981. Relation between pHc and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and an alternative method of estimating SAR of soil and drainage waters. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 45(3): 469‐475.
  28. Wu, Y., G. Xu, and H.B. Shao. 2014. Furfural and its biochar improve the general properties of a saline soil. Solid Earth. 5(2): 665-671.
  29. Xie, T., K.R. Reddy, C. Wang, and K. Xu. 2014. Effects of amendment of biochar produced from woody biomass on soil quality and crop yield. American Society of Civil Engineers. 55(1): 32-36.
  30. Yuan, J. H., and R.K. Xu. 2011. The amelioration effects of low temperature biochar generated from nine crop residues on an acidic Ultisol. Soil Use and Management. 27(1): 110-115.
Statistics
Article View: 1,297
PDF Download: 1,197


counter
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb