| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,998 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,576 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 44,214,205 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 20,564,785 |
بررسی شاخص‌های تغذیه‌ای کرم میوه گوجه‌فرنگی Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner, 1808) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) روی ده رقم گوجه‌فرنگی | ||
| نامه انجمن حشره شناسی ایران | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 37، 4 (Supplementary) - شماره پیاپی 72، اسفند 1396، صفحه 493-506 اصل مقاله (238.34 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: دومین کنگره بین‌المللی حشره شناسی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22117/jesi.2018.115701.1144 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علی جوینده1؛ ناصر معینی نقده* 2؛ حسنعلی واحدی3؛ علی حسینی قرالری4 | ||
| 1عضو هیات علمی مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی ومنابع طبیعی خراسان رضوی | ||
| 2دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیار گروه گیاه پزشکی، دانشکده کشاورزی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه رازی کرمانشاه | ||
| 4بخش تحقیقات حشره شناسی کشاورزی، موسسه تحقیقات گیاه پزشکی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| عملکرد تغذیه‌ای لارو (Helicoverpa armigera ( Hübner (مراحل لاروی چهارم، پنجم و ششم) با تغذیه از میوه سبز نارس ارقـام مختلـف گوجه فرنگی ( ارس، اترک، کورال، ریوگراند، موبیل، سیوند، سوپر موبیل، سوپر چف، سوپر کویین و سوپر اوربانا) تحت شرایط آزمایشگاهی دمای ۱±۲6 درجه سلسیوس، رطوبت نسبی 10±60 درصد و دوره نوری ۱۶ ساعت روشنایی و ۸ ساعت تاریکی بررسی شـد. بیـش‌ترین و کم‌تـرین مقادیر هضم شوندگی غذا (AD) در لارو سن چهارم به ترتیب روی ارقام اترک (026/0 ± 239/98 درصد) و سوپرچف (056/0 ± 733/95 درصد) بود. بیش‌ترین مقـادیر نرخ رشد نسبی (RGR) و نـرخ مـصرف نسبی (RCR) لارو سن پنجم در رقم موبیل به ترتیب با 038/0± 316/0 و 669/0 ± 369/7 میلی‌گرم بر میلی‌گرم بر روز ثبت شد. بیـش‌ترین مقدار هضم شوندگی غذا (AD) در لارو سن ششم با 114/0 ± 264/96 درصد در رقم سوپرچف و کم ترین آن در رقم سوپرکویین به میزان 120/0 ± 349/92 درصد برآورد گردید. بالاترین مقدار بازدهی تبدیل غذای بلعیده شده (ECI) و بازدهی تبدیل غذای هضم شده (ECD)مجموع سنین لاروی مربوط به رقم ریوگرند هد (به ترتیب با 093/0 ± 364/4 و 105/0 ± 593/4 درصد) و پایین‌ترین این مقادیر در رقم سوپر اوربانا (به ترتیب با 021/0 ± 034/3 و 022/0 ± 187/3 درصد) مشاهده شد. نتایج شاخص‌های تغذیه‌ای و تجزیه خوشه‌ای مشخص کرد که در بین ارقام مورد آزمایش، ارقام سیوند و سوپرکویین برای تغذیه H. armigera نامناسب بودند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| شاخص‌های تغذیه ای؛ کرم میوه‌‌گوجه‌فرنگی؛ Helicoverpa armigera؛ ارقام گوجه‌فرنگی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Nutritional indices and food utilization of tomato fruit worm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner, 1808) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on ten tomato cultivars | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| A. Jooyandeh1؛ Naser Moeini-Naghadeh2؛ Hassan Ali Vahedi3؛ Ali Hosseini Gharalari4 | ||
| 1faculty member/Agricultural and natural resources Researches center of Khorasan Razavi | ||
| 2Department of Plant protection, Collge of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor of Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| 4Agricultural Entomology Research Department, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Nutritional performance of the larval stages (fourth, fifth, and sixth instars) of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on unripe green fruit of ten tomato cultivars, including ‘Aras’, ‘Atrak’, ‘Korall’, ‘Mobil’, ‘Rio Grande Hed’, ‘Sivand’, ‘Super Chief’, ‘Super Mobil’, ‘Super Queen’ and ‘Super Urbana’, was studied at 26±1°C, 60±10% RH and a photoperiod of 16:8 L:D. Approximate digestibility values of the fourth instar larvae were highest (98.239±0.026%) and lowest (95.733±0.056%) on ‘Atrak’ and ‘Super Chief’, respectively. Fifth instar larvae fed on ‘Mobil’ showed the highest relative growth rate (RGR) and relative consumption rate (RCR) (0.316±0.038% and 7.369±0.669%, respectively). Approximate digestibility (AD) values of the sixth instar larvae were highest (96.264±0.114%) and lowest (92.349±0.120%) on ‘Super Chief’ and ‘Super Queen’, respectively. The highest ECI and ECD values of total larval instars (4th, 5th and 6th instars) was observed on ‘Rio Grande Hed’ (4.364±0.093% and 4.593±0.105%, respectively) and the lowest of both values was on ‘Super Urbana’ (3.034±0.021% and 3.187±0.022%, respectively). The results of nutritional indices and the cluster analysis indicated that ‘Sivand’ and ‘Super Queen’ were unsuitable hosts for feeding of H. armigera among tested cultivars. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| nutritional indices, tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera, tomatocultivars | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmad, M. (2007) Insecticide resistance mechanisms and their management in H. armigera (Hübner): a review. Journal of Agricultural Research 45(4), 319-335. Ashfaq, M., Ahmad, K.J. & Ali, A. (2003) Morphophysical factors affecting consumption and coefficient of utilization of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Pakistan Journal of Applied Science 3, 225–230. Awmack, C.S. & Leather, S.R. (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 47, 817-844. Babic, B., Poisson, A., Darwish, S., Lacasse, J., Merkx-Jacques, M., Despland, E. & Bede, J.C. (2008) Influence of dietary nutritional composition on caterpillar salivary enzyme activity. Journal of Insect Physiology 54(1), 286-296. Barton-Browne, L.B. & Raubenheimer, D. (2003)Ontogenetic changes in the rate of ingestion and estimates of food consumption in fourth and fifth instar Helicoverpa armigera caterpillars. Journal of Insect Physiology 49, 63-71. Batista-Pereira, G.L., Petacci, F., Fernandes, B.J., Correa, A.G., Vieira, P.C., Fatima da Silva, M. & Malaspina, O. (2002) Biological activity of astilbin from Dimorphandra mollis against Anticarsia gemmatalis and Spodoptera frugiperda. Pest Management Science 58, 503–507. Behdad, E. (1996) Iranian Plant Protection Encyclopedia, Pests, Disease & Weeds. Vol. 2, pp. 1269-1273. Yadboud Press. Esfahan. [In Persian] Dhillon, M.K., Singh, R., Naresh, J.S. and Sharma, N.K. (2005). The influence of physico-chemical traits of bitter gourd, Momordica charantia L. on larval density and resistance to melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett). Journal of Applied Entomology 129, 393-399. Estiarte, M., Filella, I., Serra, J. & Peñuelas, J. (1994) Effects of nutrient and water stress on leaf phenolic content of peppers and susceptibility to generalist herbivore Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Oecologia 99(3-4), 387-391. Fallahnejad-Mojarrad, N., Fathipour, Y., Kamali ,K. & Naseri, B. (2013) The effect of seeds of different chickpea and cowpea cultivars on digestive proteolytic activity of Helicoverpa armigera (Lep.: Noctuidae). Journal of Entomological Society of Iran 32(2), 1-16. (In Persian with English summary). Farid, A. (1986) Study of bollworm Heliothis armigera (Hub.) on tomato in Jyroft and Kahnuj. Applied Entomology and Phytopathology 54, 15–24. [In Persian] Fathipour, Y. & Naseri, B. (2011) Soybean Cultivars Affecting Performance of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). pp. 599-630. In: Tzi-Bun Ng (ed.) Soybean - Biochemistry, Chemistry and Physiology. ISBN: 978-953-307-219-7, InTech, DOI: 10.5772/14838. Available from: www.intechopen.com/books/soybean-biochemistry-chemistry-and-physiology/soybean-cultivars-affecting-performance-of-helicoverpa-armigera-lepidoptera-noctuidae-(accessed 2 July 2015). Fathipour, Y. & Sedaratian, A. (2013) Integrated management of Helicoverpa armigera in soybean cropping systems, pp 231–280. In: El-Shemy H (ed) Soybean-Pest Resistance. InTech, Rijeka. Fitt, G.P. (1989) The ecology of Heliothis species in relation to agroecosystem. Annual Review of Entomology 34, 17–52. Genc, H. (2006) General principles of insect nutritional ecology. Trakya University Journal of Science 7, 53–57. Hosseininejad, A. S., Naseri, B. & J. Razmjou, J. (2015) Comparative Feeding Performance and Digestive Physiology of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Larvae-Fed 11 Corn Hybrids. Journal of Insect Science 15(12), 1-6. Kashyap, R.K. & Verma, A.N. (1987) Factors imparting resistance to fruit damage by Heliothis armigera (Hiibner) in some tomato phenotypes. Insect Science and Application 8, 111-114. Kouhi, D., Naseri, B. & Golizadeh A. (2014) Nutritional performance of the tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera, on different tomato cultivars. Journal of Insect Science, 14(102). Available from: http://www.bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1673/031.014.102 (accessed 12 August 2016). Lazarevic, J. & Peric-Mataruga, V. (2003) Nutritive stress effects on growth and digestive physiology of Lymantria dispar larvae. Yugoslav Medical Biochemistry 22, 53-59. Li, Y., Hill, C.B. & Hartman G.L. (2004) Effect of three resistant soybean genotypes on the fecundity, mortality and maturation of soybean aphid (Homoptera, Aphididae). Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 1106–1111. Lindroth, R.L., Klein, K.A., Hemming, J.D.C. & Feuker, A.M. (1997) Variation in temperature and dietary nitrogen affect performance of the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.). Physiological Entomology 22, 55-64. Liu, Z., Li, D., Gong, P.Y. & Wu, K.J. (2004) Life table studies of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), on different host plants. Environmental Entomology 33, 1570–1576. Manjunath, T.M., Bhatnagar, V.S., Pawar, C.S. & Sithanantham, S. (1989) Economic importance of Heliothis spp. in India and an assessment of their natural enemies and host plants, pp. 197–228 In: Proceedings of the workshop on biological control of Heliothis: increasing the effectiveness of natural enemies. New Delhi, India. Naseri, B., Fathipour, Y., Moharramipour, S. & Hosseininaveh, V. (2010) Nutritional indices of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera, on 13 soybean varieties. Journal of Insect Science 10, 1–14. Nathan, S.S., Chung, P.G. & Murugan, K. (2005) Effect of biopesticides applied separately or together on nutritional indices of the rice leafolder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. Phytoparasitica 33, 187–195. Parra, J.R.P., Panizzi, A.R., Marinéia L. & Haddad, M.L. (2012) Nutritional Indices for Measuring Insect Food Intake and Utilization. pp. 13-49 In Panizzi, A.R. & Parra, J.R.P. (Eds.) Insect Bioecology and Nutrition for Integrated Pest Management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA. Praveen, P. M. & Dhandapani N. (2001)Consumption, digestion and utilization of biopesticides treated tomato fruits by Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Journal of BioIogical Control 15(1), 59-62. Rahimi Namin, F., Naseri, B. & Razmjou, J. (2014) Nutritional performance and activity of some digestive enzymes of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera: response to bean cultivars. Journal of Insect Science 14(93), 1-18. Scriber, J.M. & Slansky, F. (1981) The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annual Review of Entomology 26, 183-211. Schultz JC (1988) Many factors influence the evolution of herbivore diets, but plant chemistry is central. Ecology 69, 896-897. Selvanarayanan, V. & Muthukumaran, N. (2005) Insect resistance in tomato accessions and their hybrid derivatives in Tamil Nadu, India. Communications in agricultural and applied biological sciences 70(4), 613-624. Selvanarayanan, V. & Narayanasamy, P. (2006)Factors of resistance in tomato accessions against the fruit worm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Crop Protection 25, 1075–1079. Sharma, H.C. & Ortiz, R. (2002) Host plant resistance to insects : An eco-friendly approach for pest management and environment conservation. Journal of Environmental Biology 23(2), 111-135. Singh, A.K. & Mullick, S. (1997) Effect of leguminous plants on the growth and development of gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera. Indian Journal of Entomology 59, 209-214. Sivaprakasam, N. (1996)Influence of trichomes on resistance to fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Madras Agricultural Journal 83, 474-475. Slansky, F.J. & Scriber, J.M. (1985) Food consumption and utilization. pp. 87-163 In: Kerkut, G.A., Gilbert, L.I.(Eds.). Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology, volume 4. Pergamon Press. Srinivasan, R. & Uthamasamy, S. (2005) Studies to Elucidate antibiosis Resistance in Selected Tomato Accessions against fruirworm, Heticoverpa armigera Hubncr Usman, A., Khan, I.A. Shah, M., Sohail, K. & Said, F. (2012)Influence of various biochemical factors on the occurrence of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in Tomato. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 3(3), 53-58 Waldbauer, G.P. (1968) The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Advances in Insect Physiology 5, 229–288. Zalucki, M.P., Murray, D.A.H., Gregg, P.C., Fitt, G.P., Twine, P.H., & Jones, C. (1994) Ecology of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and H. punctigera (Wallengren) in the inland of Australia: larval sampling and host plant relationships during winter and spring. Australian Journal of Zoology 42(3), 329-346. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 546 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 574 |
||