Stability of Forage Yield of Promising Lines of Persian Clover (Trifolium resupinatum L.) | ||
| نهال و بذر | ||
| Article 3, Volume 33, Issue 2, August 2017, Pages 177-194 PDF (323.53 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/spij.2017.115549 | ||
| Authors | ||
| A. Malihipour* 1; M. Shahverdi2 | ||
| 1Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 2Broujerd Agricultural Education and Research Center, Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Khorramabad, Iran. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| To evaluate the compatibility and stability of Persian clover lines in different regions of Iran, an experiment was carried out with fifteen promising lines in a randomized complete block design with four replications in Karaj, Broujerd, Sanandaj and Share-e-Kord for two years. The results of combined analysis of variance for dry mather yield in different locations and years showed significant differences among lines, so that in Karaj line no. 13 (KPC/Eqlid-e-Fars/78-37) with 14.13, in Sanandaj line no. 11 (KPC/Eqlid-e-Fars/78-5) with 9.87, in Share-e-Kord line no. 8 (KPC/Lordegan-e-Char./78-17) with 9.93 and in Broujerd line no. 7 (KPC/2Chinene-e-Kord/78-30) with 13.59 tha-1 were superior lines. The slope of the regression line for dry matter yield was between 0.52 and 1.29 respectively, indicating that lines showed different responses to the environmental changes. Considering stability statistics, lines no. 10, 11, 8, 13 and 7 with the lowest deviation regression, highest coefficient of determination and highest yield were also superior.The results of stability analysis by graphical Biplot (GGE) showed that about 60% of dry matter total variations were explained by the first and second components. The results of stability analysis by Biplot (GGE) method showed that lines no. 6 (KPC/Eqlid-e-Fars/78-14) and no. 3 (KPC/Baladeh-e-Kaz./78-43) with 62 tha-1 fresh yield and 10.60 tha-1 dry matter yield were the most stable lines in different locations. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Wheat; fusarium head blight (FHB); Resistance genes; SSR markers; QTL | ||
| References | ||
|
Abassi, M. R., and Zamanian, M. 2009. Classification of selected multi-cut Persian clover germplasm of National Plant GeneBank based on agronomic traits. Pajouhesh va Sazandegi 79: 63-79 (in Persian).
Abassi, M. R., Zamanian, M., and Nadali, F. 2011. New pre-breeding genetic resources of Iranian wild clovers for using in agronomic systems. Iranian Journal of Rangelands and Forests Plant Breeding and Genetic Research 18(2): 305-317 (in Persian).
Abd El Moneim, A. M., Cocks. P. S., and Swedan, Y. 2009 . Yield stability of selected forage vetches under rainfed conditions in west Asia. Journal of Agricultural Science 111: 295-301.
Abd El-Shafi, M. A., Gheith, E. M. S., Abd El-Mohsen, A. A., and Suleiman, H. S. 2014. Stability analysis and correlations among different stability parameters for grain yield in bread wheat. Scientia Agriculturae 2 (3): 135-140.
Ahmadi, J., Vaezi, B., and Fotokian, H. 2012. Graphical analysis of multi-environment trials for barley yield using AMMI and GGEbiplot under rain-fed conditions. Plant Physiology and Breeding. Issue 1. 43pp. (in Persian).
Beheshti, A. 1997. Comparison of Persian clover forage yield and adabtability study in Mashhad rigion. Seed and Plant 13(2): 47-52 (in Persian).
Burton, G. W., and Devance, E. H. 1985. Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) from replicatcd clonal material. Agronomy Journal 42: 478-481.
Dear, B., Lacy, J., and Sandral, G. 2000. Persian Clover. Research Agronomy. Wage, Australia. Farshadfar, E., Safari, H., and Jamshidi, B. 2012. GGEbiplot of adaptation in wheat substitution lines. Agriculture and Crop Science 4(13): 877- 888.
Frankow-Lindberg, B. E., Halling, M., Hoglind, M., and Forkman, J. 2009. Yield and stability of yield of single and multi-clover grass-clover swards in two contrasting temperate environment. Grass and Forage Science 64: 236-245.
Gumber, R. K., and Sohoo, M. S. 1988. Inter relationships among different qualitative traits in Persian clover. Indian Journal of Heredity 20 (1): 46-50.
Karimi, H. 1987. Agronomy and Bereeeding of Forage Plants. Tehran University, Publications, Tehran, Iran. 414 pp. (in Persian).
Kolokol, T. L. 1985. Results of studing certain forage crops in Uzbekistan. Ispolz. Mir. Kollektsii- Kultur. Rast-dlya-selectsii. 68-78. In: CAB Abstract 1987-1989.
Martiniello, P. 1992. Variability for bio-agronomical traits and seed yield components in berseem clover Trifolium alexandrinum L. populations of the Meskawi group. Agricoltura Mediterranea 122(3): 242-247.
Perkins, J. M., and Jinks, J. L. 1971. Environmental and genotype environment components of variability.III. Multiple line and crosses. Heredity 23: 339-356.
Shukla, G. K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29: 237-245.
Taylor, N. L. 1985. Clover Science and Technology. American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison, USA.
Wassermant, V. E., Kruger, A. J., and Trytsman, M. 1998. Regrowth potential of Trifolium resupinatum in comparison to other temperature legumes. Applied Plant Science 12(1): 24-28.
Weihing, R. M. 1962. Selection Persian clover for hard seed. Crop Science 2: 381-382.
Yan, W., Hunt, L. A., Sheng, Q., and Szlavnics, Z. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega –environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science 40 : 597- 605.
Yan, W., and Kang, M. S. 2003. GGE Biplot analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists and Agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Yazdi Samadi, B., Rezaei, A., and Valizadeh, M. 2003. Statistical Designs in Agricultural Research. Tehran University Peblications, Tehran, Iran. 764pp. (in Persian).
Zamanian, M. 2009. Assessment and comparison of potential forage yield of Red clover cultivars. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 25-1: 95-109 (in Persian).
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 520 PDF Download: 383 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb