Investigating the response of Irrigated Wheat Cultivars to Herbicide Total® WG 80% (Metsulfuron-methyl + Sulfosulfuron) in Different Regions of Iran | ||
| پژوهش های کاربردی زراعی | ||
| Article 4, Volume 30, Issue 1 - Serial Number 114, March 2017, Pages 49-63 PDF (1.33 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/aj.2017.109842.1136 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Majid Abbaspoor1; Mohammadreza Karaminejad2; Mohammad Fereidoonpoor3 | ||
| 1Faculty member, | ||
| 2Faculty member, Plant and Diseases Research Lab. Iranian Institute of Plant Protection | ||
| 3Faculty member, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Fars, Darab Research Station | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Introduction: Wheat cultivars have been found to vary in responding to commonly used herbicides and their tank mixes, resulting in grain yield loss and reduced farm profits (Ramsey et al. 2010, Lemerle and Cousens, 1993). There are more than 45 commercial wheat cultivars and 20 herbicides formulations registered for weed control in wheat, in Iran that sensitivity test has not been done yet (Nourbakhsh, 2016). In our experiments, we determined the response of 11 common wheat cultivars to herbicide metsulfuron+ sulfosulfuron (Total®) as the most important herbicide to control wild barley at different regions. Materials and Methods: A field study was conducted in four regions of Iran, including Mashhad, Jolgeh-Rokh (in Torbat-Heidarieh), Darab (in Fars) and Karaj during 2011 and 2012 growing seasons. The layouts was completely randomized block design in factorial arrangement of the treatments with four replicates. Treatments were wheat cultivars (Five cultivars chosen from 11 recommended cultivars for each region) and three herbicide application times (whether at 13, 16 or 31 growth stages of wheat according to Zadoks). Root and shoot dry weight of plants sampled in early growth stages, grain yield and visual injury assessment were subjected to statistical analysis and mean separated by DMRT (α=5%). Results and Discussion: Results showed significant differences in grain yield of wheat cultivars irrespective of herbicide spraying in different growth stages. The maximum grain yield obtained from Pishgam cultivar in Mashhad and Jolgeh-Rokh, Pishgam, Mihan and Pishtaz cultivars in Karaj and Behrang, Chamran and Yavaroose cultivars in Darab. Herbicide application at Zadoks 13 on Mihan (32%), Zare (40%) and Gascogene (29%) cultivars in Mashhad caused significant reduction in root dry weight but no significant reduction in shoot dry weight and grain yield (percent of corresponding untreated control). Herbicide application on Orum and Zare cultivars at Zadok 31 caused significant reduction of root (41.5% and 30% respectively), shoot dry weight (16% and 29%) and grain yield (39 and 35%) at first year of the experiment in Karaj. Grain yield, however, was not significantly decreased in the second year. Pishgam cultivar didn’t showed unfavorable response to herbicide application in different growth stages. In Jolgeh-Rokh and Darab, neither visible injury of herbicide on wheat cultivars nor reduction in root and shoot dry weight and/or grain yield were observed. Cold temperatures appeared soon after herbicide application in Karaj and Mashhad may be responsible for the sensitivity of cultivars although they recovered in the most cases. Cultivars responses to temporarily stress are complicated, and may be dependent to settled condition and must be studied more accurately. Conclusion: Among 11 tested cultivars, most of them shown no sign of sensitivity to Total® application. Zare was recognized as the most sensitive and then after, Oroum and Gascogene showed relative sensitivity. Acknowledgements: We wish to thanks Professor Eskandar Zand, Dr. Masoud Ezatahmadi, Mr. Seyed Hoseein Torabi and Mr. Mohammad Pasban for very useful convenience on this project. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Dry weight; Growth stage; Injury symptom; Sulfonylurea; yield | ||
| References | ||
|
Agricultural Support Services Company, (ASSC). 2011. Wheat cultivars specifications based on the climate profile of the country (chapter II). Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad, Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, 54 pp. Available at Web Site: assc.ir/upload/upload/1442732339.pdf (Accessed January 2011), (In Persian). Seed and Plant Improvement Institute. 2013. Construction manual of irrigated wheat planting. Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad, Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran (Executive Office of Principle Crops). 38 pp. Available at Web Site: www.agri-falavarjan.ir/Portals/11/dator%20amal%20gandom.pdf (Accessed October 2013), (In Persian). Blair, A. M. and Martin, T. D. 1988. A review of the activity, fate and mode of action of sulfonylurea herbicides. Pesticide Science, 22(3): 195-219. Brunton, D. J. 2015. Response to metsulfuron-methyl and dicamba in wheat (Triticum aestivuum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivarsIn: Proceedings of the 17th ASA Conference, 20-24 September 2015, p. 20-24. Hobart, Australia. Bowran, D. G., and Blacklow, W. M. 1987. Sensitivities of spring wheat cultivars to chlorsulfuron measured as inhibitions of leaf elongation rates and there were genotype x environment interactions. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 38: 253-62. Bowran, D. G. 1990. The tolerance of six wheat cultivars to chlorosulfuron and triasulfuron in Western Australia. In: Proceedings of the 9th Australian Weed Conference, 6-10 August 1990, p.65-67, Adelaide. South Australia. Dastgheib, F., Field, R. J., and Narajou, S. 1994. The mechanism of differential response of wheat cultivars to chlorsulfuron. Weed Research. 34: 299-308. Geier, P. W., Stahlman, P. W., and Hargett, J. G. 1999. Environmental and application effects on MON 37500 efficacy and phytotoxicity. Weed Science. 47:736-739. Hageman, L. H. and Behrens, R. 1981). Response of small-grain cultivars to chlorsulfuron. Weed Science. 29: 414-420. Ferreira, K. L., Baker, T. K., and Peeper, T. F. 1990. Factors influencing winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) injury from sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Technology. 4:724-730. Hosseinpanahi F., Kafi M, Parsa M., Nassiri-Mahalati M., and Banayyan M. 2011. Evaluation of yield and yield components of drought-resistant and susceptible cultivars of wheat under water stress conditions using FAO Penman-Monteith model. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences 4:47-63, (In Persian with English Summery). Lemerle, D., Leys, A. R., Kidd, C. R. and Cullis, B. R. 1990. Influence of soil pH and climate on the tolerances of barley and wheat to chlorsulfuron. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 30(5): 629 – 635. Lemerle, D., and Cousens, R. D. 1993. Influence of growth stage on spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) Tolerance to Chlorsulfuron. 1993. Weed Science. 41:127-132. Martin, D. A., Miller, S. D., and Alley, H. P. 1989. Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) response to herbicides applied at three growth stages. Weed Technology. 3:90-94. Martin, J. R., and Green, J. D. 2009. A Comprehensive Guide to Wheat Management in Kentucky. Available at Web Site: http://www.uky.edu/Ag/GrainCrops/ID125Section6. html (Accessed August 2014). Monaco, T. J., Weller, S. C., and Ashton, F. M. (2002) Weed Science: Principles and practices, 4th ed. John Wiley and Sons. New York. 688 pp. Noorbakhsh, S. 2016. Index of pests, diseases and weeds of main crops, pesticides and control recommendations. Plant Protection Organization, Tehran. 203 P. Available at Web Site: http://ppo.ir/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=CqfpbWZiSCw%3d&tabid=890, (Accessed September 2016). (In Persian). Osbome, L. D., Robson, A. D., and Bowran, D. G. 1993. The impact of chlorsulfuron and diclofop-methyl on nutrient uptake by wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 44: 1757-66. Ramsey, C., Wheeler, R., Churchett, J., Walker, S., Lockley, P., Dhammu, H., and Garlinge, J. 2010. Cultivar Herbicide Tolerance Trial Protocols. Available at Web Site: http://www.nvtonline.com.au/_literature_73391/Herbicide_Tolerance_Protocols.pdf. (Accessed March 2017). Rengel, Z., and Wheal, M. S. 1997. Herbicide chlorsulfuron decreases growth of fine roots and micronutrient uptake in wheat genotypes. Journal of Experimental Botany. 48(309): 927-934. Royuela, M., Munoz-Rueda, A., and Gonzalez-Murua, C. 1990. Performance and soil persistence of chlorsulfuron when used for wheat production in Spain. Weed Science. 38: 546-52. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS/Stat User’s Guide, Version 8.0. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. Shinn, S. L., Thill, D. C., Price, W. J., and Ball, D. A. 1998. Response of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and rotational crops to MON 37500. Weed Technology. 12: 690-698. Soltani, N., Shropshire, C., and Sikkema, P, H. 2011. Sensitivity of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum) to various postemergence herbicides. Agricultural Sciences. 2(4): 451-456. Wilkinson, R. E. 1971. Research Methods in Weed Science. Southern Weed Science Society, 40 pp. Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T., and Konzak, C. F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research. 14(6): 415-421. Zand, E., Baghestani, M. A., Nezamabadi, N., and Shimi, P. 2010. Herbicides and important weeds of Iran. Markaz-E-Nashr-Daneshgahi Press, Tehran, Iran. 143 P, (In Persian). Zand, E., Mousvi, S. K., and Heidari, A. 2014. Herbicides and their applications, 2nd Edition. 2014. Jihad-e-Daneshgahi Press. Mashhad, Iran, 547 P, (In Persian). Xie, H. S., Quick, W. A., and Hsiao, A. I. 1994. Spring cereal response to imazamethabenz and fenoxaprop-p- ethyl as influenced by environment. Weed Technology. 8: 713-716. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,761 PDF Download: 1,545 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb