Variability of Soil Properties Affected by vegetation canopy cover and different grazing intensities | ||
| تحقیقات مرتع و بیابان ایران | ||
| Article 14, Volume 23, Issue 3, January 2017, Pages 593-605 PDF (393.18 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/ijrdr.2016.107620 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Amirhosein Kavianpour* ; zeynab Jafarian; Abazar Esmaeli Ouri; Ataollah Kavian | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Soil is a suitable bed for plant growth and development of vegetation, so that if it is not conserved, it will result in the nutrient deficiency, soil erosion and degradation of natural resources. In this research, the spatial variability of some chemical and physical properties of soil was investigated in different vegetation covers (minimum, moderate and maximum) and different grazing intensities including reference area (light grazing), key area (moderate grazing) and critical area (heavy grazing) in the winter rangelands of Nasho, Mazandaran province. Soil samples were collected from 0-30 cm depth according to a systematic grid (30×30 m) and then transferred to the laboratory. Soil chemical and physical properties including acidity (pH), Electrical Conductivity (EC), caco3, bulk density, particle density, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, available potassium, organic matter, initial moisture content, percentage of clay, silt and sand, sodium, calcium, and magnesium were measured in laboratory. In addition, soil surface resistance was measured in the field with a portable penetrometer. The results of statistical analysis showed that different grazing intensities had significant effects on organic matter, available potassium, pH, EC, caco3, calcium, bulk density, initial moisture content, and surface resistance of soil. Different vegetation covers had significant effects on silt percentage, organic matter, pH, EC, calcium and initial moisture content of soil. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Variability; soil characteristics; grazing intensities; Nasho rangeland | ||
| References | ||
|
-آل ابراهیم، م،ت.، صباغ نیا، ن.، عبادی، ا. و محب الدینی. م.، 1384. بررسی تنش خشکی و شوری بر جوانه زنی بذر گیاه دارویی آویشن Thymus vulgaris. پژوهش در بخش کشاورزی. 1: 30-23. -آمارنامه کشاورزی- دفترآمار و فناوری اطلاعات.- تهران: وزارت جهاد کشاورزی، معاونت امور برنامه ریزی و اقتصادی، دفتر آمار و فناوری اطلاعات، 1387. -امام، ی. و نیک‌نژاد. م.،1390. مقدمه‌ای بر فیزیولوژی عملکرد گیاهان زراعی (چاپ دوم). انتشارات دانشگاه شیراز. 571 ص. -پیراسته انوشه، ه. و امام. ی.، 1391. دستورزی صفات مرفوفیزیولوژیک گندم نان و گندم ماکارونی با استفاده از تنظیم کننده‌های رشد در شرایط متفاوت آبیاری. تولید و فراوری محصولات زراعی و باغی. 5: 29-45. -خطیرنامنی، ج.، 1380، بررسی تاثیر آتریپلکس بر خاک مراتع استان گلستان. تحقیقات مرتع و بیابان ایران. 313: 334-312. -صادقی، ح. و خانی. ک.، 1391. تاثیر سطوح مختلف تنش خشکی و شوری بر برخی ویژگی های مرفولوژیک و میزان پرولین یونجه یکساله (MedicagopolymorphaL.). علوم کشاورزی دیم ایران. 2: 13-1. -عباسی، ف.، 1386. اثر متقابل خشکی و شوری بر عوامل رشد دو گونه گیاهی Aeluropuslogopoidesو .Aeluropuslitttoralisعلوم پایه دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی. 66: 30-23. -گلدانی، م. و کمالی. م.، 1389. تاثیر پراکسیدهیدروژن برتنش کم آبی در گیاهان گل تکمه ای (GomphrenaglobosaL.) و تاج خروس زینتی .(Amaranthus tricolor L.)فن‌آوری تولیدات گیاهی. 10: 81-65 . -موسوی اقدم، س. و فروغیان. ح.، پ.، 1366. گیاه آتریپلکس و نقش آن در احیای مراتع ایران. نشریه شماره 69 ، دفتر فنی مرتع سازمان جنگل‌ها و مراتع کشور. -Akhila, S. N., Abraham, T. K. and Jaya., D. S. 2008. Studies on the changes in lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in drought stress induced cowpea Vignaun guiculata L. varieties. Journal of Environmental Biology, 29: 689-691. -Andersson, A., Keskitalo, J. and Sjodin., A. 2004. A transcriptional timetable of autumn senescence. Genome Biology, 5: 24-37. -Apel, K. and Hirt., H., 2004. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annual Review Plant Biology, 55: 373-399. -Blokhina, O., Virolainen, E. and Fagerstedt., K. V. 2003. Antioxidants, oxidative damage and oxygen deprivation stress. Annul Botany, 91: 179-194. -Bowler, C., Montagu, M. V. and Inze., D., 1992. Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance. Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 43: 83-116. -Chance, B. and Maehly., A. C., 1995. Assay of catalase and peroxidase. 764-765.In: S. P. Culowic and N. O. Kaplan (eds). Methods in enzymology Vol. 2. Academic Press. Inc. New York.. -Chaves M. M., Maroco, J. P. and Pereira, J. S., 2003. Understanding plant responses to drought- from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology, 330:239-264. -Cornic., G., 2000. Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends Plant Science, 5: 187-188. -Dobra, J., Vankova, R. Halova, M. Burman, A. J., Libus., J. and Storchova., H., 2011. Tobacco leaves and roots differ in the expression of proline metabolism-related genes in the course of drought stress and subsequent recovery. Journal of Plant Physiology, 168: 1588-1597. -Foyer, C. H. and halliwell., B., 1979. The presence of glutathione and glutathione reductase in chloroplasts: A proposed role in ascorbic acid metabolism. Planta, 133: 21-25. -Kachout, S., Ben Mansoura, A. Jaffel Hamza, K. Leclerc, J. C. Rejeb, M. N. and Ouerghi., Z., 2011. Leaf–water relations and ion concentrations of the halophyte Atriplex hortensis in response to salinity and water stress. Acta Physiologia Plantarum, 33: 335–342 -Kramer, P. J., 1983. Water relations of plants. New York: Academic Press. 570p. -Khavari-Nejad, R. A., 1986. Tradescantia albiflora. Photosyntheica, 22. 116-122. -Lawson, T., Oxborough, K., Morison, J. I. L. and Baker, N. R., 2003. The responses of guard and mesophyll cell photosynthesis to CO2, O2, light, and water stress in a range of species are similar. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54: 1743-52. -Liang, Y. C., Chen, Q. Liu, Q. Zhang, W. H. and Ding, R. X., 2003. Exogenous silicon (Si) increases antioxidant enzyme activity and reduces lipid peroxidation in roots of salt-stressed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Physiology, 160: 1157-1164. -Luigi C., Rizza, F. Farnaz-w, B., Mazzucotelli, E., Mastrangelo, A. M., Francia, E., Mare, C., Alessandro, T. and Stanca, M. A., 2008. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Research, 105: 1- 14 -Mittler, R., 2002. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Science. 7: 405-410. -Molnar, I., Gaspar, L., Sarvari, E., dulai, S., Haffman, B., Molnar, L. M. and Galiba, G., 2004. Physiological and morphological response to water stress in Aegilops biuncialisa Triticum aestivum genotype with differing tolerance to drought. Functional Plant Biology, 31:1149-1159. Nakano,Y. and Asada, K., 1981. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiology, 22: 867–880 -Pirasteh-Anosheh, H., Sadeghi, H. and Emam, Y. 2011. Chemical primary with urea and KNO3 enhances maize hybrids (Zea mays L.) seed viability under abiotic stress. Journal Crop Science Biotechnology, 14: 289-295. -Renu, K. C., and Devarshi, S., 2007. Acclimation to drought stress generates oxidative stress tolerance in drought-resistant than susceptible wheat cultivar under field conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 60: 276-283. -Shao, H. B., Liang, Z. S. and Shao, M. A., 2005. Changes of anti-oxidative enzymes and MDA content under soil water deficits among 10 wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes at maturation stage. Colloids and Surfaces Bio Interfaces. 45: 7-13. -Tsonev, T., Velikova, V., Lambreva, M. and Stefanov, D., 2000. Recovery of The photosynthetic apparatus in Bean plants after high- and low- temperature induced photoinhibition. Bulgarian Journal Plant physiology, 25: 45–53. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,009 PDF Download: 599 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb