Determining the criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management (Case study: Nav-e Asalem, Guilan province) | ||
| تحقیقات جنگل و صنوبر ایران | ||
| Article 17, Volume 24, Issue 1 - Serial Number 63, March 2016, Pages 187-176 PDF (173.08 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research article | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/ijfpr.2016.106698 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Ayoub Goleij* 1; Iraj Hasanzad Navroodi2; Soleiman Mohammadi Limaei3 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan | ||
| 2Assistant Prof., Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan | ||
| 3Associate Prof., Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Whereas sustainability is a principle in forest management, a mechanism to identify and quantify the sustainability is of great importance, too. Although several indicators and criteria exist at the international level, the main challenge is to define criteria and indicators and implement them at the national, regional and local levels of implement sustainable forest management. The purpose of this paper is to define appropriate criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management through a network of multi-criteria decision analysis methods in the Nav-e Asalem forests in Guilan province. The result included a set of 11 criteria and 65 indicators (5 ecological, 2 social and 4 economic criteria). In addition, the results showed that the area of natural forests with healthy regeneration, tree marking of seed stock and balance between growth and harvesting are the most important indicators for sustainable forest management in local scale across the study site. Of least importance were import and localization of appropriate technologies and capacity to implement international instruments. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Network analysis process; indicator; Criteria; Forest management | ||
| References | ||
|
- Anonymous, 1998. Forest Management Plan of Nav-e Asalem, District 2. Published by Forests, Range and Watershed Management Organization (In Persian). - Balana, B.B., Mathijs, E. and Muys, B., 2010. Assessing the sustainability of forest management: an application of multi-criteria decision analysis to community forests in northern Ethiopia. Journal of Environmental Management, 9: 1294-1304. - Baskent, E. and Keles, S., 2005. Spatial forest planning: a review. Ecological modeling, 188: 145-173. - Brang, P., Courbaund, B., Fisher, A., Kissling-Näf, I., Pettenella, D., Schönenberger, W., Spörk, J. and Grimm, V., 2002. Developing indicators for the sustainable management of mountain forests using a modelling approach. Forest Policy and Economics, 4: 113-123. - Chen, T.Y., 2012. Multiple criteria group decision-making with generalized interval-valued fuzzy numbers based on signed distances and incomplete weights. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(7): 3029-3052. - CIFOR., 1999. The CIFOR Criteria and Indicators Generic Template. Toolbox series No. 2, 32p. - Erdogmus, S., Aras, H. and Koc, E., 2006. Evaluation of alternative fuels for residential heating in Turkey using Analytic Network Process (ANP) with group decision making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 10(3): 269-279. - FAO., 1997. Workshop on Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management in Near East Process. Cairo, Egypt, 30 June 3 July 1997. - Gomontean, B., Gajaseni, J., Edward-Jones, G. and Gajaseni, N., 2008. The development of appropriate ecological criteria and indicators for community forest conservation using participatory methods: a case study in northern Thailand. Ecological Indicators, 8: 614-624. - Goushegir, S.Z., Feghhi, J., Mohajer, M.R. and Makhdoum, M., 2009. Criteria and indicators of monitoring the sustainable wood production and forest conservation using AHP (case study: Kheyrud educational and research forest). African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(10): 1041-1048. - Hickey, G.M. and Innes, J.L., 2008. Indicators for demonstrating sustainable forest management in British Columbia, Canada: an international review. Ecological Indicators, 8: 131-140. - Holvoet, B. and Muys, B., 2004. Sustainable forest management worldwide: a comparative assessment of standards. International Forestry Review, 6(2): 99-122. - Islam, I., Siwar, C.S., Islamil, M. and Hidayah, N., 2010. Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management in Malaysia. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 6(3): 212-218. - Jalilova, G., Khadka, C. and Vacik, H., 2012. Developing criteria and indicators for evaluating sustainable forest management: a case study in Kyrgyzestan. Forest Policy and Economic, 21: 32-43. - Kotwal, P.C., Omprakash, M.D., Gairola, S. and Dugaya, D., 2008. Ecological indicators: imperative to sustainable forest management. Ecological Indicators, 8: 104-107. - Lexer, M.J. and Brooks, R., 2005. Decision support for multiple proposes forestry. Forest Ecology and Management, 207: 1-3. - Luckert, M.K. and Williamson, T., 2005. Should sustained yield be part of sustainable forest management?. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35: 356-364. - Maes, W.H., Fontaine, M., Ronge, K. and Muys, B., 2011. A quantitative indicator framework for stand level evaluation and monitoring of environmentally sustainable forest management. Ecological Indicators, 11: 468-479. - Mendoza, G. and Prabhu, R., 2003. Qualitative multi-criteria approaches to assessing indicators of sustainable forest resource management. Forest Ecology and Management, 4(10): 329-343 - Montreal Process Working Group., 1997. Progress and Implementation of the Montreal Process on Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Management of Temperate and Boreal forests, The Montreal Process, Canada. - Pan-European Process on Forests., 1995. Criteria and indicators for the conservation and sustainable forest management. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, Antalya, Turkey. - Pukkala, T., 2002. Introduction to multi-objective forest planning: 1-19. In: Pukkala, T., (Ed.). Multi Objective Forest Planning. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Netherlands. - Rauscher, H.M., Lioyd, F.T., Loftis, D.L. and Twery, M.J., 2000. A practical decision-analysis process for forest ecosystem management. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture, 27: 195-226. - Saaty, T.L., 2000. Fundamental of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. AHP Series, RWS Publications, 478p. - Sheppard, S.R.J. and Meitner, M., 2006. Using multi-criteria analysis and visualization for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. Forest Ecology and Management, 207: 171–187. - Tajbar, S.R., Menaria, B.L., Dugaya, D. and Kotwal, P.C., 2008. Sustainable forest management in India. Current Science, 94(8): 996-1001. - Varma, V.K., Ferguson, I. and Wild, I., 2000. Decision support system for sustainable forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 128: 49-55. - Wijevardana, D., 2008. Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: The road traveled and the way ahead. Ecological Indicators, 8(2): 115-122. - William, A. and Saaty, R., 2003. Super Decisions Software Guide, 38p. - Wolfslehner, B., Vacik, H., Lexer, M.J., 2005. Application of the analytic network process in multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 207: 157-17. - Wolfslehner, B. and Vacik, H., 2008. Evaluating sustainable forest management strategies with the analytic network process in a pressure-state-response framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 88: 1-10. - Zandebasiri, M. and Parvin, T., 2012. Investigation on importance of near east process’s criteria and indicators on sustainable management of Zagros forests (Case study: Tange Solak catchment, Kohgiloye and Boyer Ahmad province). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 20(2): 204-216 (In Persian). | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 2,664 PDF Download: 1,390 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb