Related Links
Effect of strip cropping of sugar beet-alfalfa on population density of the sugar beet weevil, Lixus incanescens (Col.: Curculionidae) and species diversity of its natural enemies | ||
| نامه انجمن حشره شناسی ایران | ||
| Article 1, Volume 34, Issue 4, January 2015, Pages 1-14 PDF (253.22 K) | ||
| Authors | ||
| A. A. Abedi; A. A. Abedi* ; G. Nouri-Ganbalani | ||
| Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Science, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The sugar beet weevil, Lixus incanescens Boheman, is an important insect pest of sugar beet, Beta vulgaris L., in many parts of Iran. Strip cropping of sugar beet and alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., is a suitable strategy for improving the effectiveness of biocontrol agents of the sugar beet weevil. In this research, the population density of the sugar beet weevil and diversity of its natural enemies were studied in the strip cropping of sugar beet-alfalfa in comparison with the monoculture of sugar beet, in Juvein countryside, Khorasan Razavi province, from 2012 to 2013. In each sampling, the abundance of the sugar beet weevil and its natural enemies per plant were recorded. The densities of the sugar beet weevils in the strip cropping were significantly lower comparing to the monoculture. The larva of the hymenopteran parasitoid species Bracon intercessor Nees in both culture systems as well as seven egg predator species in strip cropping system and three egg predator species in the monoculture system were found. The percentage of larval parasitism and the densities of each predator in the strip cropping were significantly higher than the monoculture. The Shannon diversity index for the complexity of natural enemies in the strip cropping was higher comparing to the monoculture. The value of Morisita-Horn index for the complexity of the natural enemies between the experimental sugar beet cropping systems was calculated as 0.923. Based on these results, we have concluded that the strip cropping of sugar beet-alfalfa leads to higher diversity of natural enemies of the sugar beet weevil and lower population density of L. incanescens. In addition, the quantification of the predators’ species richness and abundance in the sugar beet fields remains as an effective method to improve the management of the sugar beet weevil. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Species richness; species abundance; natural enemies; Lixus incanescens; sugar beet | ||
| References | ||
|
Abbasipour, H., Mahmoudvand, M., Basij, M. & Lozan, A. (2012) First report of the parasitoid wasps, Microchelonus subcontractus and Bracon intercessor (Hym.: Braconidae), from Iran. Journal of Entomological Society of Iran 32(1), 89-92. [In Persian with English summary]. Agrawal, A. (2000) Mechanisms, ecological consequences and agricultural implications of tritrophic interactions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3, 329-335. Aleeva, M. N. (1953) Data on the biology of weevils (Col.: Curculionidae) injurious to sugar beet in Kazakhstan. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 33, 103-108. Altieri, M. A. & Letourneau, D. K. (1982) Vegetation management and biological control in agro ecosystems. Crop Protection 21, 405-430. Anonymous (2011) Agricultural statistics, Vol. I, crop production (2010-2011). Bureau for Statistics and Information Technology of Planning and Economical Division, Ministry of Jihad Agriculture, 121 pp. Baltazar, C. R. (1964) The genera of parasitic Hymenoptera in the Philippines, part 2. Pacific Insects 6, 15-67. Barbosa, P. & Segarra-Carmona, A. (1993) Criteria for the selection of pest arthropod species as candidates for biological control. pp. 5-23 in Van Driesche, R. G. & Bellows, T. S. (Eds) Steps in classical arthropod biological control. 88 pp. Entomological Society of America. Bei-Bienko, G. Y., Blagoveshchenskii, D. I., Chernova, O. A., Dantsing, E. M., Emilianov, A. F., Kerzhner, I. M., Loginova, M. M., Martinova, E. F., Shaposhnikov, G. Kh., Sharov, A. G., Spuris, Z. D., Yaczewski, T. L., Yakhontov, V. V. & Zhiltsoo, L. A. (1967) Keys to the insects of the European USSR. 1214 pp. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Zoological Institute. Colwell, R. K. (2006) Estimates: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, Version 8. Free software application. Davatchi, A & Kheyri, M. (1964) The sugar beet weevils in Iran and their control. 97 pp. Agricultural Research Organization. [In Persian]. Disney, R. H. L. (1999) Insect biodiversity and demise of alpha taxonomy. Antenna 23, 84-88. Ehler, L. E. (2004) An evaluation of some natural enemies of Spodoptera exigua on sugar beet in northern California. BioControl 49, 121-135. Hsu, J. C., Horng, S. B. & Wu W. J. (2001) Spatial distribution and sampling of Aulacaspis yabunikkei (Homoptera: Diaspididae) in camphor trees. Plant Protection 43, 69-81. Huusela, V. E. & Vasarainen, A. (2000) Plant succession in perennial grass strips and effects on the diversity of leafhoppers (Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha). Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 80, 101-112. Kheyri M. (1990) The most important pest of sugar beet in Iran and their control.126 pp. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization. [In Persian]. Kouchaki, A. & Soltani, A. (2003) Sugar beet agronomy. 200 pp. Jahad University Mashhad Publishing. Magurran, A. E. (2004) Measuring biological diversity. 254 pp. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing. Malschi, D. (2003) Research on the integrated wheat pests control (actual strategy of integrated pests management as part of agroecological system for sustainable development of wheat crop, in Transylvania). Romanian Agriculture Research 20, 9-21. Nikulina, O. N. (1989) Biology of weevils of the genus Lixus (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) developing in semi shrub and herbaceous plants in Tajikistan. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 68, 511-521. Parvizi, R. & Javanmoghadam, H. (1988) Investigation on some biological features of the sugar beet weevil (Lixus incanescens Boh.). Applied Entomology and Phytopathology 55, 1-9. [In Persian with English summary]. Price, P. W. (1997) Insect ecology. 3rd ed. 874 pp. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Saeidi, K. (2007) Preliminary survey the natural enemies of the alfalfa leaf weevils in Yasouj. Journal of Research in Agricultural Sciences 3, 1-3. [In Persian with English summary]. SAS Institute (1999) SAS/Stat user guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA. Setamou, M. & Schulthess, F. (1995) The influence of egg parasitoids belonging to the Telenomus busseolae (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) species complex on Sesamia calamistis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) populations in maize fields in southern Benin. Biocontrol Science and Technology 5, 69-81. Smith, M. W., Arnold, D. C., Eikenbary, R. D., Rice, N. R., Shiferraw, A., Cheary, B. S. & Carrol, B. L. (1996) Influence of ground cover on beneficial arthropods in pecan. Biological Control 6, 164-176. Soleyman-Nezhadiyan, A. (2009) Planting alfalfa in the adjacent sugarcane and its impact on the diversity of the sugarcane stem borer and damage. Plant Protection 32, 89-92 [In Persian with English summary]. Southwood, T. R. E. & Henderson, P. A. (2000) Ecological methods. 3rd ed. 575 pp. Blackwell Science. Talebi-Jahromi, K. (2006) Pesticides toxicology: insecticides, acaricides and rodenticides. 500 pp. Tehran University Publication. [In Persian]. Theunissen, J., Booji, C. J. H. & Lotz, L. A. P. (1995) Effects of intercropping white cabbage with clovers on pest infestation and yield. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 74, 7-16. Tobias, V. l. (1986) Bestimmungsbuch der Insekten des europaischen Teils der UdSSR, Band III, Hymenopteren IV. 741 pp. Teil, Nauka, Leningrad. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 837 PDF Download: 670 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb