| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,030 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,889 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,268,694 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 61,248,948 |
تأثیر سرعت پیشروی و عمق خاکورزی بر عملکرد تراکتور – زیرشکن | ||
| تحقیقات سامانه‌ها و مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 16، شماره 65، اسفند 1394، صفحه 109-128 اصل مقاله (479.4 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/erams.2016.105958 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد عسکری* 1؛ غلامحسین شاهقلی1؛ یوسف عباسپور گیلانده1؛ حسینعلی تاش شمس آبادی2 | ||
| 1دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی- دانشکده فناوری کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی- گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم | ||
| 2استادیار گروه مکانیک ماشینهای کشاورزی، دانشکده مهندسی آب و خاک، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در این تحقیق، مقاومت کششی مورد نیاز، سطح مقطع شیار ایجاد شده، مقاومت کششی ویژه، مصرف سوخت تراکتور، لغزش، قدرت مالبندی، بازده کششی و بازده کل انرژی به هنگام زیرشکنی بررسی شده است. اثر سرعت پیشروی در چهار سطح 8/1، 3/2، 9/2 و 5/3 کیلومتر بر ساعت و عمق خاکورزی در دو سطح 40 و 50 سانتی‌متر بر پایۀ طرح بلوکهای کاملاً تصادفی روی پارامترهای فوق مطالعه و این نتیجه به دست آمد که سرعت پیشروی وقتی افزایش یابد، مقاومت کششی، مقاومت کششی ویژه، مصرف سوخت، لغزش، قدرت مالبندی و بازده کل انرژی به ترتیب و به طور میانگین به میزان 7، 4/15، 10، 9/2، 3/108 و 6 درصد افزایش اما سطح مقطع شیار و بازده کششی به میزان 2/7 و 10 درصد کاهش مییابد. با افزایش عمق خاکورزی از 40 به 50 سانتی‌متر، مقاومت کششی مورد نیاز، سطح مقطع شیار، مصرف سوخت، لغزش و قدرت مالبندی به ترتیب حدود 3/21، 6/25، 6/39، 8/2 و 4/21 درصد افزایش اما مقاومت کششی ویژه، بازده کششی و بازده کل انرژی به ترتیب حدود 4/3، 7/6 و 4/1 درصد کاهش می یابد. مناسبترین تیمار برای صرفه جویی در مصرف انرژی، عمق خاکورزی 40 سانتی‌متر و سرعت 9/2 کیلومتر بر ساعت است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| بازده کششی؛ بازده کل انرژی؛ زیرشکن؛ مصرف سوخت؛ مقاومت کششی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effect of Forward Speed and Tillage Depth on Tractor-Subsoiler Performance | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The current research investigated the draft force, soil disturbance area, specific draft, tractor fuel consumption, slippage of drive wheels, drawbar power, traction efficiency, and overall energy efficiency of subsoiling. The effects of forward speed (1.8, 2.3, 2.9 and 3.5 km/h) and depth (40 and 50 cm) on these parameters were evaluated using a randomized complete block design. An increase in forward speed increased draft force by 7%, specific draft by 15.4%, fuel consumption by 10%, wheel slippage by 2.9%, drawbar power by 108.3%, and overall energy efficiency by 6% and decreased soil disturbance area by 7.2% and traction efficiency 10%. Increasing the subsoiling depth increased the draft force by 21.3%, soil disturbance area by 25.6%, fuel consumption by 39.6%, wheel slippage by 2.8%, and drawbar power by 21.4% and decreased specific draft by 3.4%, traction efficiency by 6.7%, and overall energy efficiency by 1.4%. The most efficient operating settings were a working depth of 40 cm with a forward speed of 2.9 km/h. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Traction efficiency, Overall energy efficiency, Subsoiler, Fuel consumption, Draft force | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbaspour-Gilandeh, Y. and Khanramaki, M. 2013. Design, construction and calibration of a triaxial dynamometer for measuring forces and moments applied on tillage implements in field conditions. J. Met. Soc. India. 28(2): 119-127.
Albana, A. R. and Hassan, N. S. 1990. Planting equipment for soil harrowing with disc harrow. The Iragi. J. Agric. Sci. 24(2): 260-267.
Aljasimy, A. S. A. 1993. The technical and economical indicators for soil harrowing with disc harrow. The Iragi. J. Agric. Sci. 242, 260-264.
Al-Suhaibani, S. A. 1992. Use efficiency of farm machinery in Saudi Arabia. ASAE Paper No. 92-1044. ASAE. St. Joseph, Michigan, USA.
Al-Suhaibani, S. A. and Al-Janobi, A. 1997. Draught requirements of tillage implements operating on sandy loam soil. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 66(3): 177-182.
Al-Suhaibani, S. A., Al-Janobi, A. A. and Al-Majhadi, Y. N. 2006. Tractors and tillage implements performance. The CSBE/SCGAB 2006 Annual Conference. July. 16-19. Edmonton. Canada.
Al-Suhaibani, S. A. and Ghaly, A. E. 2010. Effect of plowing depth of tillage and forward speed on the performance of a medium size chisel plow operating in a sandy soil. Americ. J. Agric. Bio. Sci. 5(3): 247-255.
Anon. 2009. Agricultural machinery management data. ASABE Standards, ASAE D497.6.
Arvidsson, J., Keller, T. and Gustafsson, K. 2004. Specific draught for mouldboard plough, chisel plough and disc harrow at different water contents. Soil. Till. Res. 79(2): 221-231.
Ashrafi Zadeh, S. R. 2006. Modelling of energy requirements by a narrow tillage tool. M. Sc. Thesis. Department of Agricultural and Bioresource Engineering, University of Saskatchewan. USA.
Askari, M., Komarizade, M. H., Nikbakht, A. M., Nobakht, N., and Teimourlou, R. F. 2011. A novel three-point hitch dynamometer to measure the draft requirement of mounted implements. Res. Agric. Eng. 57, 128-136.
Clark, R. L. and Adsit, A. H. 1985. Microcomputer based instrumentation system to measure tractor field performance. Trans. ASAE. 28(2): 393-396.
Crowell, G. and Bowers, J. R. 1985. Southeastern tillage energy data and recommended reporting. Trans. ASAE. 28(3): 731-737.
De Souza, E. G., Lima, J. S. S. and Milanez, L. F. 1994. Overall efficiency of tractor operating in the field. Trans. ASAE. 106, 771-775.
Glancey J. L., Upadhyaya, S. K., Chancellor, W. J. and Rumsey, J. W. 1996. Prediction of agricultural implement draft using an instrumented analog tillage tool. Soil. Till. Res. 37, 47-65.
Harrigan, T. M. and Rotz, C. A. 1995. Draft relationships for tillage and seeding equipment. App. Eng. Agric. 11 (6): 773-783.
Ismail, W. I. W. and Burkhardt, T. H. 1993. Draft and fuel requirements measurement using tractor on-board data acquisition system. Pertanika J. Sci. Tech. 1(1): 51-64.
Khosravani, A., Loghvi, M. and Solhjoo, A. 1998. Evaluation and comparison of traction performance of middle power tractors in Iran. Proceedings of the 1st National Congress of Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization. Karaj, Iran. (in Persian).
Mckyes, E. and Maswaure, J. 1997. Effect of design parameters of flat tillage tools on loosening of a clay soil. Soil. Till. Res. 43(3): 195-204.
McLaughlin, N. B., Drury, C. F., Reynolds, W. D., Yang, X. M., Li, Y. X., Welacky, T. W., and Stewart, G. 2008. Energy inputs for conservation and conventional primary tillage implements in a clay loam soil. Trans. ASABE. 51, 1153-1163.
Misao, Y. 1992. Studies on mechanical subsoil breaking (Part2). The characteristic failure performance for rotary subsoil breaker with a chisel type subsoiler. J. Japan. Soc. Agric. Mach. 54(1): 27-37.
Moeenifar, A. M., Kalantari, D. and Mousavi Seyedi, S. R. 2013. Application of dimensional analysis in determination of traction force acting on a narrow blade. Int. J. Agric. Crop. Sci. 59, 1034-1039.
Mosavi Seyyedi, S. R. 2009. Evaluation the operational parameters of U650 tractor under different speeds and depths. Proceedings of the National Conference on Water, Soil, Plant and Mechanization Sciences. Islamic Azad University of Dezful. Dezful. Iran. (in Persian).
Olatunji, O. M. and Davies, R. M. 2009. Effect of weight and draught on the performance of disc plough on sandy-loam soil. Res. J. App. Sci. Eng. Tech. 1(1): 22-26.
Owen, G. T. 1989. Subsoiling forces and tool speed in compact soils. Can. Agric. Eng. 31, 15-20.
Raheman, H. and Jha, S. K. 2007. Wheel slip measurement in 2WD tractor. J. Terramech. 44(2): 89-94.
Ramadhan, M. N. 2011. Field study to evaluate the mechanical performance of the double tines longitudinally arranged subsoiler and its effect on some growth characteristics of barley hordeum vulgare L. M. Sc. Thesis. College of Agriculture, Basrah University. Basrah. Iraq.
Ramadhan, M. N. 2014. Developmenet and performance evaluation of the double tines subsoiler in silty clay soil part1: draft force, disturbed area and specific resistance, Mesopotamia J. Agric. 421, 293-313.
Ranjbarian, S., Askari, M. and Jannatkhah, J. 2015. Performance of tractor and tillage implements in clay soil. J. Saudi. Soc. Agric. Sci. (in Press)
Raper, R. L. 2002. The influence of implement type, tillage depth and tillage timing on residue burial. Trans. ASAE. 455, 1281-1286.
Sahu, R. K. and Raheman, H. 2006. Draught prediction of agricultural implements using reference tillage tools in sandy clay loam soil. Biosys. Eng. 94(2): 275-284.
Serrano Joao, M., Peça, J. O. and Santos, F. 2005. Draft and fuel requirement’s in tillage operations: modeling for optimizing tractor - implement systems. Proceedings of the EFITA/WCCA Joint Congress in Agriculture. VILA Real. Portugal.
Shahi, N., Shahgholi, G. and Biranvand, M. 2010. Modelling of soil-blade interaction and effect of speed and depth on subsoiler performance using discrete element method (DEM). Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Agricultural Machinary Engineering and Mechanization. University of Tehran. Karaj. Iran (in Persian).
Shebi, J., Oni, K. C. and Braide, F. G. 1988. Comparative tractive performance of three tractors. Agric. Mech. Asia. 192, 25-29.
Sheikh, G. S. 1989. Agricultural mechanization research development and planning. J. Agric. Sci. 21, 3-4.
Spoor, G. and Godwin, R. J. 1978. An experimental investigation into the deep loosening of soil by rigid tines. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 2(3): 243-259.
Stafford, J. V. 1979. The performance of a rigid tine in relation to soil properties and speed. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 24(1): 41-56. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,119 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 779 |
||