| تعداد نشریات | 282 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 80 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,188 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,336 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 51,459,719 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 91,332,261 |
کاربرد فرایند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی دررتبهبندی شاخصهای موثر بررقابت پذیری صنعت مبلمان چوبی در ایران | ||
| تحقیقات علوم چوب و کاغذ ایران | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 30، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 53، دی 1394، صفحه 578-594 اصل مقاله (374.14 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijwpr.2015.102892 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| الهام گورزی1؛ آژنگ تاج دینی* 2 | ||
| 1دانشجو/ گروه علوم و صنایع چوب و کاعذ،دانشگاه آزاداسلامی واحد کرج | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه علوم و صنایع چوب و کاغذ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد کرج، | ||
| چکیده | ||
| از دﻻﻳل ﻣﻬﻢ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻣﻲ ﺷﺮکتهای ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪی در ﺑﺎزارﻫﺎی ﺑﻴﻦاﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ، ﻣﻲﺗﻮان ﺑﻪ ﻋﺪم رﻗﺎﺑﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮی آنها در قیاس با رقبا اﺷﺎره ﻧﻤﻮد، لذا هدف از این مطالعه تعیین و رتبهبندی شاخصهای موثر بر رقابتپذیری صنعت مبلمان چوبی ایران با استفاده از فرآیند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی میباشد. برای این منظور با مطالعات و بررسی پژوهشهای صورت گرفته و مصاحبه با تعدادی از کارشناسان متخصص، شاخصهای موثر بر رقابتپذیری صنعت مبلمان چوبی ایران به 4 گروه اصلی و 19 زیرشاخص تقسیم شدند. درجه اهمیت شاخصها و زیرشاخصها پس از اخذ آرای کارشناسان با بکارگیری فرآیند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی تعیین شد. نتایج نشان داد که در میان شاخصهای سطح اصلی، شاخصهای اقتصادی، فنی، مواد و مصالح و انسانی بهترتیب دارای بالاترین ارزش وزنی میباشند. همچنین زیرشاخص طراحی موفق نسبت به سایر زیرشاخصها دارای بالاترین اولویت بوده و بعد از آن زیرشاخصهای مواد اولیه، مدیریت پایدار، نیروی انسانی متخصص، توسعه استاندارد، عرضه پایدار و برندسازی بهترتیب بالاترین اولویتها را بهخود اختصاص دادهاند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| فرآیند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی؛ رقابت پذیری؛ شاخص؛ زیرشاخص؛ صنعت مبلمان چوبی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Applying analytical hierarchy process in ranking of the effective indices on competitiveness of the wooden furniture industry in Iran | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Elham Gudarzi1؛ Ajang Tajdini2 | ||
| 1Student/Department of Wood and Paper Science and Technology, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| One of major causes of the failure production companies in the international markets is referred to the lack of their competitiveness in comparison with competitors. Therefore, the purpose of this study were determining and ranking of the effective indices on competitiveness of Iran’s furniture industry by analytical hierarchy process. ّFor this purpose, reviewing and investigating of researches carried out by others and interviewing with a numbers of especialista,the effective indices on competitiveness of Iran’s wooden furniture industry divided into the 4 main groups and 19 sub-indices.Importance degree of the indices and sub-indices were determined after collecting experts opinion by AHP method.The results showed that mainindicators economic, technical, materials, human being indices have highest weight values respectively. Successful designing sub-indices was dramatically higher than the other sub-indices and after that the sub-indices of raw materials, sustainable managem ent, professional human resources, standard development, sustainable supply, branding have allocated highest priority in AHP method respectively. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Analytical Hierarchy Process, Competitiveness Index, Sub-indices, Wood furniture industry | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
-Alizadeh, H., Faezipour, M., Azizi, M. and Ziaei, M., 2014. Determining the effective indices on export development of Iran’s office furniture thereby analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Industries, 5(2): 117-128 -Alizadeh, H., Faezipour, M., Azizi, M. and Ziaei, M., 2014. Survey the situation of furniture foreign trade, determine and prioritize the influencing indexes on export development (Case study: Household Furniture). Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Science Research, 29(2): 299-309 -Ambashta, A. and Momaya, k., 2002. Competitiveness of firms: review of theory, frameworks and models. Singapore Management Review, 26(1): 45-58. -Asgari, M., 2009. Ranking of small and medium-scale industries competitiveness in Iran. Journal of Commercial Survays, 7(38): 21-31. -Azar, A., rezaei, Z. and Moradi, H.R., 2014. Evaluation of supply chain distribution and identification factors affecting the furniture industry (case study: Yaftabad-Tehran region). Journal of Forest and Wood Products, 66 (4): 453-465 Bahadori, M.K., Babaei, M. and Mehrabian, F., 2013. Prioritization factors influencing job motivation in employees of a military center using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Iranian Journal of Military Medicine, 14(4); 236-243 -Clottey, T.A., Collier, D.A. and Stodnick, M., 2008. Drivers of customer loyalty in a retail store environment. Journal of Service Science, 1(1): 35-48. -D’Cruz, J. and Rugman, A., 1992. New concepts for Canadian competitiveness. Kodak Canada Inc. Press, Canada. 196 p. -Home and Office Furniture Exporters Union. 2009. The Bulletin of home and office furniture union, a look at export hall of the 18st international exhibition of Home and Office Furniture (Hofex). Feb. 2-6 Tehran, Iran, 50 p. -Farahani, R., Rezapour, Sh. And Kardar, l., 2011. Supply chain sustainability and raw material. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6):1075-1082. -Fatollahzadeh, A., Amiri, S., Doosthosseini, K. and Faezipoor, M., 2006. A study of the international trade of furniture in Iran case. Iranian Journal of Natural Resources, 58(4): 236-249. -Gazo, R. and Quesada, H.J., 2005. A review of competitiveness strategies of furniture manufacturers. Journal of Forest Products, 55(10): 66-73. -Ghodsipoor, S. H., 2013. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP), 2ed Ed. Tehran Polytechnic Press, Iran. 2224 p. -Ghofrani, M., Farshchi, V. and Azizi, M., 2014. Investigate and identify the indicators of customer loyalty to the brand in the furniture industry by AHP. Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Science Research, 29(2): 310-323. -Gokay, N., Hiziroglu, S., Serin, H., Akyuz, K. C., Akyuz, I. and Toksoy, D., 2007. A perspective from furniture and cabinet manufacturers in Turkey. Journal of Building and Environment, 42 (4): 1699-1706. Gudarzi, E., 2014. Identifying and ranking of the effective factors on competitiveness of the household wood furniture industry by multi-attribute decision making method in Iran. Ms.C thesis, Department of Wood and Paper Science and Technology, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj. -Han, X., Wen, Y. and Shashi, k., 2009. The global competitiveness of the Chinese wooden furniture industry. Journal of Forest Policy and Economics, 11(8): 561-569. -Ice Kualalampur., 2008. General overview of the wood industry in Malaysia, http:// www. Ice.it/paesi/ Asia/ Malaysia/ woodworking. Pdf. -Maya, V., and Carpenter, C., 1992. Total quality management in the furniture industry, Annual Quality Congress, Nashville TN, 46(10): 570-576. Malaki Gholangoz, M., Tajdini, A., Pourmousa, Sh. And Agharafiei, E., 2014. Identifying and ranking of factors affecting customer satisfaction of the household wood furniture by multi-attribute decision making method (Case Study: home furniture). Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Science Research, 28(4): 591-708. -Mehregan, M. R., 2013. Advanced operational research, 2ed Ed. Publication of University Book, Iran, 256 p. -Mesdag, M.V., 2000. Culture-sensitive adaption or global standardization-the duration–of-usage hypothesis. International Marketing review, 17(1): 74-84. -Mohebbi, N., Azizi, M., Fatollahzadeh, A. and Mohebbi Gargari, R., 2010. Determination of the effective criteria on development of Iran furniture industry by analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Journal of Wood & Forest Science and Technology, 17(1): 115-116. -Osman, H., Hemmington, N. and Bowie, D., 2009. A transactional approach to customer loyalty in the hotel industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 21(3): 239-250. -Ratnasingam, J. and Loras, F., 2005. The Asian furniture industry: the reality behind the Statistics. European Journal of Wood and Wood products, 3(1): 64-67. -Ratnasingam, J. and Lim, C., 2008. Status and challenges of the Malaysian furniture sector in the globalized world. Proceedings of the National Conference on Forest Products, October 2008, Kualalumpur, Malaysia, pp: 190-198 -Rousta, A., Venoos, D. and Ebrahimi, A., 2007. Marketing management, Tehran, Samt publishing, 420p. (In Persian) -Shurchuluu, P., 2002. National productivity and competitiveness strategies for the new millennium. Journal of Integrated Manufacturing System, 13(6): 408-414. -Simerson, K., 2011. Strategic planning: A practical guide to strategy formulation and execution.Greenwood Publishing Group, The United States of America, 294p. -Tajdini, A., Rabie, D., Jahan Latibari, A. and Pourmousa, Sh., 2011. Study on effective indexes on exports of wooden furniture in Iran. Journal of Sciences and Techniques in Natural Resources, 6(2): 71-87. -Tajdini, A., Taghadosi, A. H., Pourmousa, S., Jahan Latibari. A., Safdari, A. and Roohnia, M., 2012. Study of the effective indices on imports of wooden furniture in Iran. Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Science Research, 28(2): 24-34. Tracogona, A., Pelizzari, S. and Finzi, U., 2009. The World furniture outlook 2008. Centre for industrial studies, Italy.4 p -Tracogona, A., Pelizzari, S. and Finzi, U., 2013. The World furniture outlook 2012. Centre for industrial studies, Italy.5 p. -Ziaie, M., 2010. Global furniture market at a glance: Major players, strategic trends, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Wood and Paper Industries, 48(6): 48-54.(In Persian). Zolghadr, M., 2007. Review of Iran's trade in wood and the possibility of wood products exports to the Persian Gulf Arab states. Iran Wood & Paper Indstry Magazine, 28(2): 98-99. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,283 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,036 |
||