| تعداد نشریات | 287 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 85 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,159 |
| تعداد مقالات | 35,108 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 50,530,617 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 90,479,293 |
تأثیر جنگلکاری با گونههای سوزنیبرگ بر ترسیبکربن اتمسفری (پژوهش موردی: جنگلکاریهای کارخانه ذوبآهن اصفهان) | ||
| تحقیقات جنگل و صنوبر ایران | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 23، شماره 1، فروردین 1394، صفحه 53-63 اصل مقاله (339.42 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijfpr.2015.102358 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حجت نریمانی* 1؛ محمدحسین ایران نژاد پاریزی2؛ بهمن کیانی2؛ رسول قربعلی3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد جنگلداری، دانشگاه یزد | ||
| 2استادیار، دانشگاه یزد | ||
| 3پژوهشگر، بخش تحقیقات پایه، ایمنی، بهداشت و محیطزیست کارخانه ذوبآهن اصفهان | ||
| چکیده | ||
| بهمنظور ارزیابی توان ترسیب کربن گونههای سوزنی برگ سرو نقرهای (Cupressusarizonica)و کاج تهران (Pinuseldarica) در جنگلکاریهای ذوبآهن اصفهان که در سنین 17 تا 18 سالگی بودند، پس از مشخص کردن قطعات کشتشده با اینگونهها، تعدادی از آنها بهصورت کاملاً تصادفی انتخاب شدند. سپس از هر گونه تعداد پنج پایه از طبقات قطری مختلف (پنج طبقه) انتخاب و قطع شد. همچنین نمونههای خاک از دو عمق صفر تا 30 و 30 تا 60 سانتیمتری در هر یک از قطعات کشتشده تهیه شد. پس از انتقال اندامهای مختلف گیاهی به آزمایشگاه، ضریب تبدیل ترسیب کربن اندامهای گیاهی بهصورت جداگانه با روش احتراق تعیین شد. درنهایت میزان ترسیب کربن کل برای گونههای مختلف و اندوخته کربن اندامها و عمقهای مختلف خاک مورد مقایسه قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که میزان ترسیب کربن در دو گونه مورد بررسی، اختلاف معنیداری در سطح اطمینان 99 درصد دارد و سرو نقرهای توان ترسیب کربن بیشتری را نسبت به کاج تهران بهخود اختصاص داده است. همچنین ترسیب کربن در بین اندامهای مختلف (برگ، اندام چوبی، ریشه) تفاوت معنیداری در سطح 99 درصد نشان داد، بهطوریکه اندام چوبی بیشترین مقدار ترسیب کربن در هکتار را داشت. کربن ذخیره شده در خاک دو منطقه کشتشده با این گونهها اختلاف معنیداری با یکدیگر نداشت. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| ترسیب کربن؛ جنگلکاری؛ ذوبآهن اصفهان؛ سوزنیبرگ | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effects of plantation with conifers on Carbon sequestration (Case study: Zob-e-Ahan company, Isfahan) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hojjat Narimani1؛ Mohammad Hossein Iran Nezhad Parizi2؛ Bahman Kiani2؛ Rasoul Ghorbali3 | ||
| 1M.Sc. Student Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources and Desert Science, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Prof., Faculty of Natural Resources and Desert Science, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran | ||
| 3Research Expert, Division of Main, Safety, Hygiene and Environment, Esfahan Steel Company, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The potential for carbon sequestration was evaluated for two coniferous species (Cupressus arizonica Green var. arizonica and Pinus eldarica Medw) in 17-18 year old plantations of Zob-e-Ahan industrial company near Isfahan. Transect sampling was conducted in each section, and five trees in each of the available 5 diameter classes were randomly selected and cut. Moreover, soil samples from 0 to 30 and 30 to 60 cm depth were collected in each part. Shoots and roots of the trees were separately collected and weighted. In addition, carbon sequestration of organs and soil was determined with an in-situ combustion method. Results showed that the rate of carbon sequestration was significantly different between two species (p<0.01), for which C. arizonica showed higher rate than P. eldarica. In addition, carbon sequestration showed significant difference (p<0.01) amongst the tree parts (roots, woody organs and leaves), where woody parts exhibited the highest carbon sequestration. Investigation of soil carbon storage showed no significant difference between soils in which two plantations were established. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Carbon sequestration, plantation, conifer, Zob-e-Ahan company of Isfahan | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
- Abdi, N., Maadah Arefi, H. and Zahedi Amiri, Gh., 2008. Estimation of carbon sequestration in Astragalus rangelands of Markazi province (Case study: Malmir rangeland in Shazand region). Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 15(2): 269-282 (In Persian). - Aiiubi, Sh., 2012. Assessment limitations and capacity of soils current range green space of Isfahan steel company (Final Report). Isfahan Steel Company in Collaboration with Technical University of Isfahan, 431p (In Persian). - Allen-Dias, B., 1996. Rangelands in a changing climate: impacts, adaptations and mitigation. In: Watson, Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate change: Scientific- Technical Analyses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 131-158. - Aradottir, A., Savarsottri, L., Kristin, H., Jonsson, P. and Gudbergsson, G., 2000. Carbon accumulation in vegetation and soils by reclamation of degraded areas. Icelandic Agricultural Sciences, 13: 99-113. - Barnes, B.V., Zak, D.R., Denton, S.R. and Spurr, S.H., 1998. Forest Ecology. 4th edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, 56p. - Birdsey, R.A., 1992. Carbon storage and accumulation in United States forest ecosystems. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service, 12p. - Blake, G.R. and Hartge, K.H., 1986. Bulk density. In: Klute, A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Soils Science Society of America, Publication No. 9, Part 1: 363-376. - Bordbar, S.K. and Mortazavi Jahromi, M., 2006. Carbon sequestration potential of Eucalyptus comaldulensis Dehnh. and Acacia salicina Lindl. plantation in western areas of Fars province. Journal of Pajuhesh & Sazandegi, 70: 95-103 (In Persian). - Bruce, J.P., Frome, M., Haites, E., Joanne, H., Lal, R. and Faustion, K., 1999. Carbon sequestration in soils. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, First Quarter, 382-389. - Forouzeh, M.R., Heshmati, G. and Messbah, S.H., 2008. Comparing on carbon sequestration potential of three shrub species: Helianthemum lippii (L.) Pers., Dendrostellera lessertii Van Tiegh. And Artemisia sieberi Besser in semi-arid rangelands of Iran. Journal of Environmental Studies, 46: 65-72 (In Persian). - Henderson, G.S., 1995. Soil organic matter: a link between forest management and productivity. In: Bigham, J.M. and Bartels, J.M. (Eds.), Carbon forms and Functions in Forest soils. Soils Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 419-435. - Hu, Y.L., Zeng, D.H., Fan, Z.P., Chen, G.S., Zhao, Q. and Pepper, D., 2008. Changes in ecosystem carbon stocks following grassland afforestation of semiarid sandy soil in the southeastern Keerqin Sandy Lands, China. Journal of Arid Environments, 72: 2193-2200. - Indufor, 2002. Assessing forest based carbon sinks in the Kyoto protocol forest management and carbon sequestration. Discussion paper, 115p. - Korner, C., 2003. Carbon limitation in trees. Journal of Ecology, 91: 4-17. - Lal, R., 2005. Forest soils and carbon sequestration. Forest Ecology and Management, 180 (1-3): 317-333. - MacDicken, K.G., 1997. A Guide to monitoring carbon storage in forestry and agro forestry projects. Winrock International Arlington, VA, USA, 87p. - Mahmoudi Taleghani, E.A., Zahedi Amiri, G.H., Adeli, E. and Sagheb Talebi, Kh., 2007. Assessment of carbon sequestration in soil layer of managed forest. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 15(2): 241-252 (In Persian). - Narimani, H., Iran Nezhad Parizi, M.H., Kiani, B. and Ghorbali, R., 2013. Evaluation and comparison potential carbon sequestration of important species in green space of Isfahan Steel Company. M. Sc. Thesis,azd University, 111p. - Nosetto, M.D., Jobbagy, E.G. and Paruelo, J.M., 2006. Carbon sequestration in semi-arid rangelands. Journal of Arid Environments, 67: 142-156. - Mahdavi, S.Kh., Sanadgol, A., Azarneivandi, H., Babaee Kafaee, S., Jafari, M. and Mahdavi, F., 2009. The impact of Atriplex lentiformis density on carbon sequestration and comparison with its Rangeland plantation project (Case study: Isfahan). Plant and Ecosystem, 17: 19-29 (In persian). - Paul, K.I., Polglase, P.J., Nyakuengama, J.G. and Khanna P.K., 2002. Change in soil carbon following afforestation. Forest Ecology and Management, 168(1-3): 241-257. - Schlesinger., 1999. Soil Organic matter a Source of atmospheric CO2 Department of Botany. North Carolina, USA, pp. 111-125. - Schulp Catharina, J.E., Naburus, G.J., Verburg, P.H. and Waal, R.W., 2008. Effect of tree species on carbon stock in forest floor and mineral soil and implication for soil carbon inventories. Forest Ecology and Management, 256: 482-490. - Fang, S., Xue, J. and Tang, L., 2007. Biomass production and carbon sequestration potential in poplar plantations with different management patterns. Journal of Environmental Management, 85: 672-679. - Varamesh, S., Hoseini, S.M., Abdi, N. and Akbarinia, M., 2010a. Effect of plantation on increasing carbon sequestration and improved some soil characteristics. Iranian Journal of Forest, 1(2): 25- 35 (In Persian). - Varamesh, S., Hoseini, S.M., Abdi, N. and Akbarinia, M., 2010b. Increment of soil carbon sequestration due to forestation and its relation with some physical and chemical factors of soil. Iranian Journal of Forest, 35: 1-25 (In Persian). - Uri, V., Varik, M., Aosaar, J., Kanal, A., Kukumagi, M. and Lohmus, K., 2012. Biomass production and carbon sequestration in a fertile silver birch (Betula pendula Roth) forest chronosequence. Forest Ecology and Management, 267: 117-126 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,934 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,568 |
||