Effects of energy subsidies on production costs and finished price of cotton crop (Case study: Golestan Province) | ||
| پژوهش های پنبه ایران | ||
| Article 3, Volume 1, Issue 2, December 2014, Pages 29-41 PDF (712.07 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/ijcr.2013.100777 | ||
| Authors | ||
| S.D. Ghasemian* 1; A. Darijani2; S.S. Hosseini3; E. Hassanpour2; S.A.R. Binazir4 | ||
| 1M.Sc. Graduate, Dept. Agricultural Economics, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, and Agriculture in Development Planning Applied Science Behshahr, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Prof., Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, Iran. | ||
| 3Professor, Dept. og Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Economics & Agricultural Development College of Agriculture & Natural Resources University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 4Coach and former Managing Fund Careers Ministry of Labor and Social | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The cotton is unique plant in terms importance of food, medicine and industrial uses. Because of the considerable exchange technology and property income, employment and relative advantage of cotton, it is considered as a strategic and important crop to the national economy. During past two decades, trade and pricing policies on production, cultivated area and export of cotton has been more effective than any other regional crops. This study was carried out to determine the effects of removing energy subsidies policy on costs of cotton and its production, contribution of agricultural inputs costs and energy carriers and final price of the cotton in Golestan province. During a time-scaled, data was collected from production cost database of agricultural products and 20 questionnaires completed by scholars and experts using the Delphi approach. The costs of production, agricultural inputs, and final price of cotton were calculated by using modified industrial cost accounting techniques into three adjusting subsidies scenario "before policy accomplishment" (, price of gasoline and electricity in 165 and 20 Rials, respectively), "during the policy accomplishment "(the current situation with the price of gasoline in 1500, 3500 and electricity in 140 Rials) and" after policy implementation "(final price of energy carriers, the price of gasoline and electricity in 550 7900 Rials, respectively. The results showed that the cost of cotton production was increased during (1&2) and after implementation of the policy as 5, 12 and 23 percent, respectively, due to increasing gasoline. In terms increasing electricity price, cotton production was increased during and after implementation of the policy as 42 and 185 percent, respectively. Therefore, causing implementation of the policy, final price of cotton production will be increased from 7130 to 8190 Rials (complete removal of gasoline subsidies) and 13200 Rials (complete removal of electricity subsidies). Thus, it is recommended that removal of subsidies was done as gradually and warily program. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Energy Carriers; cotton; Adjusted Industrial Accounting Technique; Golestan | ||
| References | ||
|
Allanson, P. 2008. On the characterization and measurement of the redistributive effect of agricultural policy. J. Agri. Eco. 59 (1): 169-187. Anonymous. 2007. Energy balance sheets. Office of Energy Planning, Department of Energy Affairs, Ministry of Energy, Tehran, Iran.
Anonymus, 2011. Agriculture statistics, first volume, field crops, 2009-2010 crop year. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Programming and economics deputy, Statistics and information technology office. Tehran. Iran.
Ghasemian, D.S., Hosseini, S.S., and Darijani, A. 2011. The role of energy prices (machinery fuel) on the finished cost of wheat in Gorgon city. P.263. proceedings of the 1st conference on Optimization of Production, Distribution and Consumption in the Food Industry. May 10-11, 2011. Gorgan. Iran.
Golden, B., Kastens, T., and Dhuyvetter, K. 2006. Likely impacts of rising energy price on irrigated agriculture in western Kansas, Kansas water office report Topeka. Kansas. USA.
Hope, E., and Singh, B. 1995. Energy Price Increases in developing countries case studies of Colombia, Ghana, Indonesia, Malaysia, Turkey, and Zimbabwe. The World Bank Policy Research Department, Public Economics Division.
Ismaili, K., and Trazkar, M. H. 2005. Estimating the electricity demand in the agricultural sector; a case study in Fars province, Fifth Biennial Conference of Iranian Agricultural Economics. Available from: http://www.civilica.com/ Papers-IAEC05. html Cached.
Khosravi, E., and Torkamani, J. 2000. Estimation of cotton export supply function and the relationship between exports, productivity and production.p. 466-495.Proceedings of 3rd Iranian conference of the agricultural economics. 18-20 Feb, 2000. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Iran.
Kim, T. 2006. The measurement of decoupled payments effects on US. Agricultural production, Ph.D. Dissertation University of Missouri-Columbia.USA.
Rashidghalam, M., and Khalilian, S. 2011. Effects of Removing Agricultural Production Factors Subsidies on Sugar Beet Production in Iran. J. Sustainable Agri. Prod. Sci. 21(2): 43-52.
Salami, H. 1999. The effect of joining Iran to WTO on agriculture division. Center for Agricultural Planning and Studies Center. Tehran. Iran.
Salami, H.A, and Saraei-shad, Z. 2010. Effects of removal of fuel subsidy on wheat price in Iran. J. Agric. Econ. Res. 2(2): 61-71.
Sinabell, F., and Hofreither, F. 2006. Distributional effects of CAP instruments on farm household incomes. Selected paper prepared for presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Long Beach, California. July 23-26. Vaezi, L., and Yazdani, S. 2008. Studying government support policies in wheat production in Iran. J. Eco. Agri. 2(2): 51-67.
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 2,912 PDF Download: 2,218 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb