| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,029 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,886 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,259,531 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 60,551,288 |
تعیین مشخصههای فنی سامانه‌های استحصال و جمع‌آوری آب باران برای بادام دیم | ||
| تحقیقات مهندسی صنایع غذایی | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 14، شماره 2، شهریور 1392، صفحه 1-16 اصل مقاله (353.69 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jaer.2013.100229 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| علیرضا توکلی* | ||
| استادیار پژوهش بخش تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان سمنان (شاهرود) | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به منظور افزایش بهره‌وری بارش، کاهش سهم مصارف غیرمفید بارش و ایجاد باغ بادام از طریق سامانه‌های مختلف استحصال و جمع‌آوری آب باران در حوضه‌های کوچک (MCWH)، این پژوهش از سال 1379 به مدت 6 سال در استان آذربایجان‌شرقی، شهرستان اسکو – منطقه یال ایلخچی و در دیمزارهای کشاورزان به اجرا درآمد. تیمارهای مورد مطالعه شامل آرایش سامانه‌های مختلف استحصال و جمع‌آوری آب باران (شکل و مساحت)، مدیریت سطوح رواناب و بهبود ذخیرة آب خاک در بستر ریشه، برای دو رقم بادام دیر گل پیوندی بوده است. برخی از مشخصههای زراعی و رشدی محصول و آستانه رواناب و برآورد عملکرد محصول مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. بر اساس نتایج تحقیق و با تکیه بر مدیریت کنترل تبخیر در پای درختان، تیمار برتر و قابل توصیه شامل اندازه سطح رواناب 7×7 متر + سطوح رواناب تمیز و غلتک‌زده شده و بدون نیاز به استفاده از پلیمر است و تفاوتی بین شکل حوضه‌های جمع‌آوری رواناب وجود ندارد، اگرچه آرایش مربعی اندکی بر آرایش نیم‌دایره‌ای برتری دارد. در آزمایش‌های متعدد تعیین آستانة رواناب برای حوضه‌های جمع‌آوری رواناب در تیمار غلتک‌زده، 5/2 تا 5/3 میلی‌متر، در تیمار تمیز و صاف شده، 5/3 تا 5/4 میلی‌متر و در تیمار طبیعی، 5/4 تا 5/5 میلی‌متر اندازه‌گیری و برآورد شد. در سال 1385 میزان عملکرد تک درخت حدود 3 کیلوگرم برآورد شد که با 204 نهال در هکتار در تیمار برتر، عملکرد 612 کیلوگرم در هکتار خواهد شد. پژوهش‌های تکمیلی برای بررسی جنبه‌های زراعی و حرکت سطحی و زیرسطحی آب در سطوح رواناب در خاک‌ها و شیب‌های مختلف پیشنهاد می‌گردد. | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Determination of Technical Characters of Micro-Catchments Water Harvesting Systems for Rainfed Almond Trees | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Water harvesting in agriculture mobilizes rainwater in a catchment area (usually non-productive) to benefit growing plants in a target area. This brings water available to the target area closer to crop water requirements so that economical agricultural production can be achieved, improving rainwater productivity. To investigate micro-catchment water harvesting (MCWH), a field experiment was conducted from 2000 to 2006 in East Azarbaijan in northern Iran using a split-split plot factorial design with five replications. The treatments comprised two MCWH patterns (small basins and semi-circular bunds); three catchments sizes of 25 m2 (5×5, R = 2 m), 49 m2 (7×7, R = 2.85 m) and 81 m2 (9×9, R = 3.7 m); three runoff area treatments (natural; cleaned and smoothed; cleaned, wetted and compacted); and two-infiltration areas (natural, soil mixed with polymer at 1 kg/tree) for two new almond varieties. Agronomic characteristics, product growth, threshold runoff and crop yield estimates were examined. The results were compared with farmed fields (traditional and irrigated) and showed that the tree survival rate was about 35%-55% for irrigated farmed fields and 100% for the MCWH site. The use of a polymer had no significant effect on water retention. Although a small basin (9×9) and runoff area that were compacted using a polymer gave better results for the survival, growth and productivity of almonds, a small basin (7×7) compacted without a polymer is recommended based on the economic analysis. Threshold runoff was 2.5-3.5, 3.5-4.5 and 4.5-5.5 mm for the natural, cleaned and smoothed, and cleaned, wetted and compacted conditions, respectively. During the 2006 season, the fruit yield was estimated to be 3 kg/tree, totaling 612 kg/ha for the recommended treatment. For the farm fields, the optimal treatment combined required at least 1-2 irrigations during the summer. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Almond, Dryland farming, evaporation, rain, Rain water, threshold runoff, water harvesting | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Al-Turbak, A. S. 1999. Efficient use of rainwater in irrigation in south-western Saudi Arabia. Proceeding of the 9th International Rainwater Catchment Conference. July. 9. Petrolina. Brazil.
Anaya, M. G. and Tovar, J. S. 1975. Different soil treatments for harvesting for radish production in the Mexico valley. Proceeding of the Symposium on Water Harvesting. March. 26-28. Phoenix. US Department of Agriculture (USDA). Washington D. C. 315-320.
Balvinder, S., Gupta, G. N. and Prasad, K. G. 1988. Use of mulches in establishment and growth of tree spicies on dry lands. Indian Forester. 114(6): 307-316.
Barzegar-Ghazi, A., Abdi-Ghazi, A., Javanshir, A. and Moghaddam, M. 2001. Afforestation by rain water and evaluation different types of trees at On-Ebn-Ali: Tabriz. J. Agric. Sci. 4(11): 39-56. (in Farsi)
Boers, T. M. 1994. Rainwater harvesting in arid and semi-arid zones. Ph. D. Thesis. Wageningen Agricultural University. Wageningen. The Netherlands.
Boers, T. M. and Ben-Asher, J. 1985. Harvesting water in the desert. Research Report. International Land Reclaimed Institute (ILRI). Wageningen. The Netherlands.
Boers, T. M., Graaf, D. E., Feddes, R. A. and Ben-Asher, J. 1986. A linear regression model combined with soil water balance model to design micro-catchments for water harvesting in arid zones. Agric. Water Manag. 11, 187-206.
Evenari, M., Shanan, L. and Tadmor, N. 1971. The Negev: The Challenge of a Desert. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.
Fooladmand, H. R. and Sepaskhah, A. R. 2003. Economic analysis for the production of four grape cultivars using microcatchment water harvesting systems in Iran. J. Arid Environ. 58(4): 525-533.
Gupta, G. N. 1994. Influence of rainwater harvesting and conservation practices on growth and biomass production of Azadirachta indica in the Indian desert. Forest Ecol. Manag. 70, 329-339.
Gupta, G. N. and Mohan, S. 1991. Response of various tree species to management and their suitability on degraded sandy clay loam soil of semi arid regions. Indian J. Forestry. 14(1): 33-41.
Gupta, J. P. and Muthana, K. D. 1985. Effect of integrated moisture conservation technology on the early growth and establishment of Acacia-tortilis in the Indian desert. Indian Forester. 111(7): 477-485.
Gupta, G. N., Choudhary, K. R., Bilas, S., Mishra, A. K. and Singh, B. 1993. Neem establishment in arid zone as influenced by different techniques of rain water harvesting. Indian Forester. 119(11): 914-919.
Hashemi-Nia, S. M. 2004. Water Management at Agriculture. Ferdowsi University Press. (in Farsi)
Hira, G. S., Kalkat, J. S. and Shakya, S. K. 1990. Use of plastic sheet for plantation in problem soils. Proceeding of the XI International Congress on the Use of Plastic in Agriculture. Feb. 26-March. 2. New Delhi. India. 161-165.
Holt, R. M. 1989. A promising approach for sustainable range and agroforestry development in warm arid areas. Central Rangelands Development Project. Ministry of Lilestock, Forestry and Range. Mogadishu. Somalia.
Kaarakka, V. 1996. Management of bushland vegetation using rainwater harvesting in eastern Kenya. Acta Forestalia Fennica. Ph. D. Thesis. Department of Forest Ecology/Tropical Silviculture. University of Helsinki. Finland.
Karpiscak, M. M., Foster, K. E. and Rawles, R. L. 1984. Water harvesting and evaporation suppression. Aridlands Newsletter. 21, 10-17.
Kinhal, G. A. 1998. Early planting and critical watering- an effective method of waseland afforestation. Adv. Forest. Res. India. 1, 125-134.
Kossar, A. 1973. Preliminary results of rainfed forestry in dry lands of Iran using petroleum mulch. Research Report. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. Iran. (in Farsi)
Najafi, A., Barzgar-Ghazi, A., Javanshir, A. and Moghaddam, M. 1997. Afforestation by rain water harvesting and evaluation of different species: a case study. Proceeding of the 8th International Conference on Rainwater Catchmant Systems. April. 10-14. Tehran. Iran.
Oweis, T. Y. 1994. Water Harvesting Concepts and Techniques for Agriculture. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA).
Oweis, T. Y. and Hachum, A. Y. 2003. Improving Water Productivity in the Dry Areas of West Asia and North Africa. In: Kijne, J. W., Barker, R. and Molden, D. (Eds.) Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement. International Water Management Institute (IWMI). Colombo. Sri Lanka.
Sepaskhah, A. R. and Fooladmand, H. R. 2004. A computer model for design of microcatchment water harvesting systems for rainfed Vineyard. Agric. Water Manag. 64(3): 213-232.
Sepaskhah, A. R. and Kamgar-Haghighi, A. A. 1989. Study on runoff harvesting system for dryland grapes. Research Report. No. 18-297-AG-60. Shiraz University. Shiraz. Iran. (in Farsi)
Sharma, K. D. 1986. Run off behavior of water harvesting micro catchments. Agric. Water Manag. 11, 137-144. Swatantra, S. D. 1994. Soil and water conservation in situ an innovative technique. Indian Forester. 120(1): 30-34. Tabatabaee-Yazdi, J., Haghayeghi, S. A., Ghodsi, M. and Afshar, H. 2010. Rainwater harvesting for supplementary irrigation of rainfed wheat in Mashhad region. J. Water Soil. 24(2): 198-207. (in Farsi)
Tavakoli, A. R. 2007. Response of almond trees to micro catchment water harvesting (MCWH) in east Azarbayejan. Research Report. Dryland Agricultural Research Institute (DARI). Maragheh. Iran. (in Farsi) Tavakoli, A. R. and Oweis, T. 2005. Improving rain water productivity by micro-catchments water harvesting (MCWH) systems in the northwest of Iran. Proceeding of the IV International Symposium on Pistachios and Almonds. May. 22-25. Tehran. Iran.
Zare, E. 2008. Comparative advantage of almond in Iran. J. Agric. Sci. 18(2): 27-36. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,417 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 903 |
||